Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Remee+. Архитектура здоровья.

@remeeplus

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,477subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002671113263
TypeChannel
Username@remeeplus
Description🔸Remee+ — это архитектура, навигация, стратегии и технологии здоровья для тех, кто не ждёт, а действует. 🔸Мы восстанавливаем, а не залечиваем. Делаем это — вместе с вами. 🔸В новый мир с нами remee.space🌌 🔸Техподдержка - @RemeeSupport
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/remeeplus

Growth

7,4777,4877,4826 August 2026 — 7,487 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,487 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,484 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,477 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,476–7,489 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 08:447,477-7
7 Aug 2026, 09:257,484-3
6 Aug 2026, 10:197,487no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:017,487first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 2 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.0%
avg views ÷ 7,477 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,870
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.26%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held25 (2 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total35,535
Reactions total433
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
31
Videos
11
Links
215

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
48s
Average length
48s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

649 reactions across 24 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
24938.4%
👍23335.9%
❤‍🔥16024.7%
🤔40.616%
🏆30.462%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 649reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 25 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @remeeplus. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC320 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Хорошая тренировочная программа может быть плохой именно для вас. 22 августа — большой онлайн модуль РемСАЙЗ (RemCISE). 🌟Можно взять отлично составленную тренировочную программу, выполнять её дисциплинированно и всё равно получить совсем не тот результат, ради которого вы начали. Потому что сама программа — ещё не персонализация. ✨Три силовые в неделю для одного человека станут оптимальным стимулом для роста силы

👍7❤‍🔥4

11 Aug 2026, 06:43 UTC196 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @detsdoc

Срочный вопрос по здоровью? Важно ‼️ Наш с Remee+ «второй мозг» — RemAI, теперь может отвечать более чем на 70% ваших вопросов про здоровье, которые раньше оставались без ответа. Теперь они получают содержательный и полезный ответ. Важнейшее обновление. 👉СКОРЕЕ ПРОБУЙТЕ на сайте или в телеграм приложении Напоминаю, RemAI — это наш классный ИИ-ассистент, который построен строго на закрытой базе знаний и обучен мои

👍81

10 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTC560 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Самая тяжёлая тренировка недели может оказаться самой бесполезной. РемСАЙЗ (RemCISE). 🌟Есть странный способ оценивать качество тренировки, который до сих пор живёт и среди новичков, и среди вполне опытных людей. ▶️Футболка мокрая насквозь — хорошо. ▶️На лестнице после ног хочется плакать — отлично. ▶️На последнем повторении штанга почти перестала двигаться — вообще идеально. Чем сильнее нас размазало после трениро

👍11❤‍🔥96

8 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC≈5,180 views30 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Кто решил, что вашему организму сегодня нужно ровно 10 000 шагов? РемСАЙЗ (RemCISE). 🌟23:40. Вы уже потренировались, устали, собираетесь спать. На часах — 8736 шагов. И вдруг вместо кровати идёте гулять с собакой второй раз, наматываете круги по квартире или специально оставляете машину подальше. ▶️Потому что кольцо не закрыто в приложении фитнес-гаджета. ✨Это один из самых любопытных парадоксов современной забот

24❤‍🔥5👍1

6 Aug 2026, 10:33 UTC840 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Вы тренируетесь, но становитесь слабее. Как спорт начинает забирать здоровье в долг? РемСАЙЗ (RemCISE). 🌟Принято считать, что ▶️мышцы растут в зале, ▶️выносливость появляется на дорожке, ▶️а здоровье укрепляется вместе с количеством тренировок. Но сама нагрузка ничего не укрепляет. Она лишь предъявляет организму требования: 🥶стать сильнее, 🥶быстрее, 🥶экономичнее 🥶и устойчивее. ✨Выполнить эти требования он должен у

❤‍🔥15👍145

4 Aug 2026, 14:05 UTC871 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

📌НАВИГАЦИЯ. Что такое Remee+ и Международная Академия стратегического восстановления здоровья и эпигенетики? ▶️Анализы стали лучше. Почему здоровье не вернулось? ▶️Remee+ сегодня. Что такое здоровьеобеспечение через восстановление? ▶️Вам назначили всё правильно. Почему самочувствие стало хуже? ▶️У вас четыре специалиста. Почему никто не отвечает за ваше здоровье целиком? ▶️Три новые специальности Remee+. Кто буд

❤‍🔥4👍21

3 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC909 views35 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

😷 Знакомим вас с пушистым маскотом нашего проекта - Медведем Remee+! ⬇️ Напишите в комментариях - как он вам? Надеемся, что подружитесь, потому что на протяжении многих недель в определенный день он будет знакомить вас с направлениями Remee+! 🐻‍❄️ 🫢 В его сообщениях будет много полезных советов в конце каждого видео! _ команда Remee+ | remee.space

👍226❤‍🔥4🤔3

1 Aug 2026, 07:03 UTC≈1,110 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🔥Более 50 человек вошли в систему, которой ещё год назад не существовало! 🌟Первая группа Международной Академии Remee+ уже учится. Большинство выбрало направление РМС — Метаболический специалист. Другие пошли в РСЗ (врачи). И Нутривенты. ✨Но самое интересное — КТО эти люди. 🔺Врачи разных специальностей. 🔺Нутрициологи и хэлс-коучи. 🔺Фармакологи, биотехнологи, химики и учёные. 🔺Экономисты, педагоги, лингвисты, агро

👍18❤‍🔥8

27 Jul 2026, 14:34 UTC≈1,230 views44 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Нутрициология оказалась в тупике. Кто такой Нутривент? 🌟В сфере питания сегодня сложилась почти абсурдная ситуация. С одной стороны, питание ежедневно влияет на обмен веществ, пищеварение, композицию тела, развитие ребёнка, восстановление после болезни и способность человека сохранять энергию. С другой — специалиста, который профессионально занимается питанием, система либо пытается превратить во врача, либо продо

28❤‍🔥11👍4🏆1

25 Jul 2026, 08:01 UTC≈1,180 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Врач лечит болезнь. Кто возвращает человеку здоровье? 🌟Медицинское образование учит: 🥶распознавать заболевание, 🥶подтверждать диагноз, 🥶выбирать лечение, 🥶контролировать риски 🥶и не пропустить опасное состояние. Это огромная и незаменимая работа. ✨Но почти нигде врача системно не учат другому: что делать после того, как угроза устранена, показатели стали приемлемыми, а человек всё ещё не вернулся к нормальной жизн

❤‍🔥13👍102

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @remeeplus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 174,950 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Remee+. Архитектура здоровья.” (@remeeplus), 7,477 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/remeeplus.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.