Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Адвокаты Relocode по США и Европе: внж, паспорта, счета, налоги

Channel

Адвокаты Relocode по США и Европе: внж, паспорта, счета, налоги

@relocode

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,123subscribers

-37 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001175818303
TypeChannel
Username@relocode
Created27 May 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held20
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/relocode

Growth

11,12311,16011,141.56 August 2026 — 11,160 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,156 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,147 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,140 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,141 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,143 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,139 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,147 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,153 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,155 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,154 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,159 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,155 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,145 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,139 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,137 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,136 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,132 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,124 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,123 subscribers6 August 202630 August 2026
20 measurements spanning 23 days, net -37. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,117–11,166 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 03:2411,123-1
29 Aug 2026, 02:1611,124-8
25 Aug 2026, 23:0611,132-4
24 Aug 2026, 22:1711,136-1
23 Aug 2026, 07:0311,137-2
21 Aug 2026, 20:3811,139-6
20 Aug 2026, 18:0311,145-10
19 Aug 2026, 18:3511,155-4
18 Aug 2026, 21:4711,159+5
17 Aug 2026, 20:5711,154-1
16 Aug 2026, 22:2711,155+2
15 Aug 2026, 17:3711,153+6
14 Aug 2026, 06:5311,147+8
12 Aug 2026, 21:0311,139-4
11 Aug 2026, 22:1311,143+2
10 Aug 2026, 22:1811,141+1
8 Aug 2026, 21:2811,140-7
7 Aug 2026, 23:3711,147-9
7 Aug 2026, 01:2611,156-4
6 Aug 2026, 20:1611,160first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 1 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.4%
avg views ÷ 11,123 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,490
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.503%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held33 (1 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total26,826
Reactions total117
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 11:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

168 reactions across 24 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍8751.8%
3420.2%
🔥127.14%
🤔84.76%
🙏74.17%
😁63.57%
😱63.57%
🤯42.38%
👏21.19%
🎉10.595%
🥰10.595%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 168reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 11:46 UTC525 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Для тех кто в Лондоне или думает стоит ли выходить на рынок UK Пример того, что можно тут построить И просто классные ребята . Проводят встречу для партнеров и инвесторов Михаил, привет! Пишу тебе потому что мы вместе состоим в GTC. Мы организуем ивент с Dwelly в октябре. По твоему интро в коммьюнити думаю, что тебе будет релевантно. https://luma.com/adxvw49i?coupon=PERSONAL Постараюсь тоже быть, можем там тоже

1😁1

Signed Михаил Мижинский

25 Aug 2026, 09:14 UTC893 views6 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Перезапуск налогового клуба https://t.me/taxmastermind/371

👍41🙏1

Signed Михаил Мижинский

25 Aug 2026, 09:14 UTC798 viewsread 29 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed Михаил Мижинский

23 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC≈1,040 viewsread 29 August 2026

Налоги Европы Наш канал где мы обсуждаем Налоги, счета в банках, комплаенс, семейные фонды и еще ряд очень полезных тем Не пропустите ! В сентябре планируем перезапуск налогового клуба Следите за анонсами t.me/taxmastermind

Signed Михаил Мижинский

22 Aug 2026, 19:45 UTC≈1,070 views11 reactionsread 29 August 2026

21 августа 2026 года судья федерального суда Южного округа Нью-Йорка Jeannette A. Vargas вынесла решение по делу CLINIC v. Rubio, No. 1:26-cv-00858 и признала политику Госдепартамента по приостановке выдачи иммиграционных виз гражданам 75 стран незаконной. Суд постановил vacate эту политику — то есть не просто сделать исключение для истцов, а отменить саму оспариваемую политику.

6👍5

Signed Mike USA

22 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC≈1,420 views6 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Хорошие новости для всех, кто идет на Грин карту США США отменили админ паузу для 75 стран? Нет, еще нет, но сделан очень важный шаг ! 21 августа федеральный суд решил что пауза незаконна, при чем не в части рассмотрения иска конкретного человека, а вообще незаконна в целом. Ранее было похожее решение, но касательно конкретного человека. Сейчас в целом признали само такое решение незаконным. Что дальше? 90% адм

👍6

Signed Mike USA

20 Aug 2026, 10:35 UTC≈1,100 views4 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @taxmastermind

Примеры судебных разбирательств с целью отмены режима Бэкхем и перерасчета налога за весь период: ⚖️ 1. TSJ Madrid — фиктивный employment (simulation doctrine) Суд: Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Madrid 📅 практика подтверждена 2023–2025 ⸻ 📌 В чём был спор Налогоплательщик применял Beckham Law на основании: • трудового договора • трудоустройства в испанскую компанию Налоговая доказала, что: • компания не ве

👍3🔥1

Signed Mike USA

20 Aug 2026, 06:40 UTC≈1,020 views15 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Zoom кофе? @mikhailmizhinsky

👍122🥰1

Signed Михаил Мижинский

19 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC≈1,860 views7 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Налоговое планирование Это когда Вы просчитываете риски до того как придет налоговая Особенно это важно, когда есть цель идти на паспорт в одной из стран ЕС, США, UK и др. и для этого приходится стать там налоговым резидентом Помогаем избежать ненужных потерь Работаем с рисками до того, как они станут дорогими проблемами Разбираемся с налогами таких стран, как: Франция Испания Португалия Люксембург Италия Монако

👍7

Signed Михаил Мижинский

13 Aug 2026, 07:55 UTC≈1,780 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Режим Бэкхема в Испании: специальный налоговый режим Рассказываем про то, кому дадут и основные ошибки при получении, которые могут дорого обойтись, новые проверки со стороны налоговой Испании и приметы отзыва режима с вытекающим перерасчетом налогов за все года плюс штрафами Консультации @relocode_dm

🎉1

Signed Михаил Мижинский

12 Aug 2026, 10:10 UTC≈1,760 views16 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @relocode_usaPhoto

⚠️ Важное предупреждение Нам стало известно, что кто-то пытается копировать наши аккаунты и выдавать себя за сотрудников Relocode. Мошенники заменили одну букву в адресе нашего основного Telegram-аккаунта, который отвечает на входящие заявки. ✅ Единственный официальный аккаунт для связи: @relocode_dm 📱 Номер, к которому привязан аккаунт: +44 7379 044502 Если Вам пишет или Вы попали на аккаунт с похожим названием,

👍7😱61🤔1🤯1

Signed Михаил Мижинский

11 Aug 2026, 18:58 UTC≈1,570 views8 reactionsread 29 August 2026

РЕЛОКАЦИЯ КАПИТАЛА Сегодня это еще интереснее и сложнее, чем релокация людей Особенно с учетом постоянно меняющихся налоговых, юридических, регуляторных и банковских комплаенс-рисков. Консультации по Вашей ситуации Пишите на @relocode_dm

👍5🤔21

Signed Mike USA

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @relocode. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@relocode edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
24 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 9,433 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Елена Берковская
@berkovskaya_elena · 78,163
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Адвокаты Relocode по США и Европе: внж, паспорта, счета, налоги” (@relocode), 11,123 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/relocode.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.