Channel
@relocation_russian
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
12,790subscribers
-23 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001103359717 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @relocation_russian |
| Created | 21 August 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/relocation_russian |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 12,790 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:52 | 12,792 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:11 | 12,794 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:41 | 12,796 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:37 | 12,801 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:37 | 12,807 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 12,811 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:32 | 12,813 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:20 | 12,813 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 August 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
14,051 reactions across 20 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 3,579 | 25.5% | |
| 🤮 | 3,289 | 23.4% | |
| 💩 | 2,607 | 18.6% | |
| 😁 | 1,916 | 13.6% | |
| 💯 | 744 | 5.29% | |
| 🤡 | 493 | 3.51% | |
| 🤯 | 439 | 3.12% | |
| 😡 | 289 | 2.06% | |
| 🤬 | 232 | 1.65% | |
| 👏 | 200 | 1.42% | |
| 🔥 | 123 | 0.875% | |
| 😱 | 51 | 0.363% | |
| ❤ | 46 | 0.327% | |
| 👎 | 18 | 0.128% | |
| 😐 | 13 | 0.093% | |
| 💔 | 6 | 0.043% | |
| 🤨 | 6 | 0.043% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,051reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 August 2024 to 25 August 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Адвоката-иноагента Ивана Павлова заочно арестовали в Петербурге. Мера пресечения связана с обвинением в нарушении порядка деятельности иноагента. Об этом сообщил сам Павлов, который сейчас находится за границей. Иноагентом адвокат стал ещё в 2021 году. Он был одним из защитников Ивана Сафронова, приговорённого к 22 годам лишения свободы по делу о госизмене.
👍424💩15❤7💔2
Иоланда пошла по рукам. Донашивает гондон за Собчак, похвально.
😁483💩195🤡67👍17🤮15😱4
На урода, который, как он говорит, чувствует себя женщиной, Александра Шпака завели уголовное дело. Он решил сжечь свой паспорт и не придумал ничего умнее, чем снять это на видео. Конечно, видео он опубликовал в своем Телеграм-канале, что ещё ждать от этого сверхразума. Весь перформанс сопровождался антироссийскими лозунгами и заявлениями о том, что больше ничего общего с нашей страной и культурой он иметь не хочет…
💩688🤮286😁30👏25🤡24🤬7👍4❤1
Треморный Ходор считает, что население России должно составлять 40-50 млн, причем для каждого он распределил производственную роль. Хочется напомнить, что этот человек имел и имеет политические амбиции. Он просто вычеркнул примерно 100 млн человек, а из остальных готов создать антиутопию.
🤮652😡195💩135🤬44🤡39😁5❤2😱2
Опять жопа горит у хохлов, хехе. Очень латте хочется.
💩454😁169🤡60💯21❤3🤬1
Ущербный певец ртом и звездой на башке Андрей Данилко остался недоволен критикой благодарного зрителя и буквально послал его на три буквы. Во время выступления Вереи Сердючки из зала зритель возмутился тем, что украинский артист поёт песни на русском языке. В ответ воспитанный и вежливый Данилко сказал, что если тот не замолчит, то «пойдет вслед за русским кораблем».
🤮410💩112🤡93😁20👍4❤2👏2
Самоназванный историк, а на деле поехавшая бабка Тамара Эйдельман (иноагент) продолжает распространять выдумки о Второй мировой войне. Никак не может жидовская морда признать, что Советский Союз совершил колоссальный подвиг, чтобы спасти себя и весь мир от нацистско-фашистской заразы. Она продолжает отстаивать бедных несчастных англо-саксов, которые так страдали, так страдали...
🤮633😡87🤬74💩62👍9👎4💯3❤2
Мерзкая иноагентская дрянь Панин устраивает содом на американских пляжах.
🤮743💩157🤡44👍7😁7😱2🤬1🤯1
Дудь загнал себя в котёл круче, чем это смог бы сделать любой из его гостей.
👍248😁177💩68🤮34🤡17😡2🤨1
А могли сыграть на опережение и давно перекрыть кислород диванной террористке.
👍458💯189😁47❤4🤮1
Наверное, Путинский кровавый режим незаконно удерживает в застенках честных тбилисян.
😁495🤡51👍28🤮7💔4😡4👏1
Telegram-каналы «BRIEF Важное», «BRIEF», «Незыгарь», а также «Сирена» внесены в реестр иноагентов, сообщил Минюст.
👍451👏40😐10❤5🤡5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @relocation_russian. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 836,139 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“АнтиНавальный” (@relocation_russian), 12,790 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/relocation_russian.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.