25 Sept 2024, 15:35 UTC226 viewsread 7 August 2026
https://t.me/Binance_Moonbix_bot/start?startApp=ref_299511981&startapp=ref_299511981&utm_medium=web_share_copy
Channel
Relictum Pro
@relictumpro
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
226subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001306029200 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @relictumpro |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 2 April 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/relictumpro |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 226 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:01 | 227 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:00 | 228 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:41 | 228 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 2 April 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 September 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
25 Sept 2024, 15:35 UTC221 viewsread 7 August 2026
Don't miss opportunity!!!
1 Nov 2021, 14:35 UTCviews —
Relictum Pro pinned Deleted message
6 May 2020, 05:35 UTC≈3,460 viewsread 7 August 2026
#Stablecoin #RLC is the main coin of the #RelictumPro network, the issue of which is built on the #forging of coins… https://t.co/FiYjKgntir
4 May 2020, 04:05 UTC≈3,170 viewsread 7 August 2026
#Relictum Pro transaction speed (the rate of filling the entire network with blocks in each node) takes from 0.5 to… https://t.co/2muCmGVqGX
24 Apr 2020, 20:28 UTC≈2,270 viewsread 7 August 2026
#RELICTUMPRO has chosen #Android 🤖 due to the fact that this platform is more friendly for installing and running… https://t.co/MyZgDXQlq5
24 Apr 2020, 10:24 UTC≈1,700 viewsread 7 August 2026
Relictum Pro Registration + Node installation on Windows OS 🇺🇸 | Blockchain Of the Latest Generation… https://t.co/YUl97W0N02
24 Apr 2020, 04:06 UTC≈1,240 viewsread 7 August 2026
🔊Dear Relictum Pro community! 🚀13 000 Members of Relictum PRO has been reached. During this time, we received a lot… https://t.co/eq4aPkbQWy
20 Apr 2020, 20:49 UTC≈1,010 viewsread 7 August 2026
#RelictumPro is a supplemented modification of #SHA1-based #hashing mathematics. The main advantage of it is in con… https://t.co/QHdCzqC1kz
18 Apr 2020, 18:22 UTC748 viewsread 7 August 2026
In #RelictumPro, Genesis #tokens (GTN) give the right to receive royalties for the use of the intellectual property… https://t.co/hRFLHKhhZ8
17 Apr 2020, 20:41 UTC614 viewsread 7 August 2026
Relictum #blockchain platform uses a unique TCP/IP-based #protocol, in which a virtual communication channel with e… https://t.co/WVJKPFkAHp
15 Apr 2020, 18:29 UTC712 viewsread 7 August 2026
🔊Dear Relictum Pro community! Our community is growing and we reached 9000 participants. In the near future we will… https://t.co/P6loDV5Ssa
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @relictumpro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Relictum Pro” (@relictumpro), 226 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/relictumpro.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.