8 measurements spanning 6 days, net +191. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,496–22,745 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 06:36
22,716
+23
12 Aug 2026, 09:44
22,693
+43
11 Aug 2026, 08:59
22,650
+25
10 Aug 2026, 11:11
22,625
+32
9 Aug 2026, 09:52
22,593
+29
8 Aug 2026, 09:01
22,564
+31
7 Aug 2026, 08:04
22,533
+8
6 Aug 2026, 19:17
22,525
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 14 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
87.6%
avg views ÷ 22,716 subscribers
Avg views / post
19,900
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held
20 (14 March 2025 – 27 July 2026)
Views total
19,900
Reactions total
267
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Aug 2026, 05:05 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Links
4
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
9,551 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,529
36.9%
🍓
2,910
30.5%
🔥
1,111
11.6%
👏
578
6.05%
❤🔥
333
3.49%
🥰
312
3.27%
🤩
302
3.16%
💋
252
2.64%
🎉
224
2.35%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,551reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 March 2025 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
25
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 18 we hold a reading for · 39%
Most on one post
14
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rekberfamous. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 March 2025 to 27 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
selamat malam semuanya, ada informasi terbaru soal list. dengan berat hati harus aku sampaikan bahwa @rekber_parkrose mulai saat ini tidak lagi ada di dalam list @.rekberfamous, dikarenakan alasan "jual beli".
sesuai dengan hasil diskusi sebelumnya aku dengan seluruh pihak rekber yg telah menjadi bagian @rekberfamous telah mengadakan diskusi dengan kesepakatan bahwa, rekber yg masuk ke dalam list rekber famous jika d…
Halo selamat malam, disini saya ingin memberi announcement. Perihal beberapa pihak yang kena SCAM atas nama akun yang keterangan claim sebagai owner/admin dari @RekberFamous.
Perlu di ingatkan bahwa pihak pengurus @RekberFamous sama sekali tidak memiliki akun yang akan di publikasikan secara publik untuk melakukan transaksi rekber, dikarenakan ch ini hanya channel yang berisikan saran beberapa rekber, dan ch ini buk…
selamat siang semuanya, dengan berat hati harus aku sampaikan bahwa @rekberlee mulai saat ini tidak lagi ada di dalam list @.rekberfamous, dikarenakan suatu perihal.
karena sebelumnya aku dengan seluruh rekber yg telah menjadi bagian @rekberfamous telah mengadakan diskusi dengan kesepakatan bahwa, rekber yg masuk ke dalam list rekber famous jika diperjual belikan maka rekber tersebut harus dihapus sementaraa dari lis…
tindakan ini bukan karena masalah personal, ya kaka2.
sebelumnya aku beserta semua pihak rekber famous yg ada di dalam list sempat mengadakan diskusi yg mencantumkan point penting kenapa rekber itu dilepas dari list. dari pihak kami sudah memutuskan jika rekber tersebut banyak mendapat complaint yg fatal dari customer maka akan kami berikan warning, batas warn hanya 3x kesempatan jika lebih harus menerima konsekuens…
hallo semuanya, selamat siang. disini aku ingin memberikan informasi, mengenai rekber yang tercantum di list. dengan sangat berat hati aku sampaikan bahwa @rekber_allpay sudah bukan lagi rekber yang tercantum di list @rekberfamous. ada beberapa faktor dan perihal yang tidak bisa aku sebutkan secara rinci, dan sudah aku jadikan bahan pertimbangan yang sangat matang dengan waktu yang cukup lama. catatan: Rekber tersebu…
already updated.
halo selamat siang semuanya, disini saya ingin menginfokan bahwa sudah ada penambahan rekber baru di list @rekberfamous yaitu @rekberciell.
rekber yang sudah ditambahkan ini adalah hasil pertimbangan yang sangat matang, sudah masuk dalam kriteria, serta merupakan ajuan dari banyak pihak yang menyarankan. serta saat saya cek sendiri @rekberciell sudah memenuhi kriteria dan persyaratan untuk masuk ke…
dan juga untuk soal penambahan list atau penghapusan dari list, saya akan meminta kalian memberikan laporannya lewat bot. untuk laporannya, bisa berupa :
1. saran rekber yang bisa di pertimbangkan untuk masuk list, saya hanya akan menambahkan rekber yang sudah sesuai kriteria dari hasil diskusi dan saya akan menilai langsung kepada rekber tersebut.
2. laporan atas pihak rekber yang di list telah melakukan pelanggaran…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rekberfamous. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@rekberfamous edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
11 August 2026
Most recent edit
11 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 786 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 196 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AVAIL REKBER” (@rekberfamous), 22,716 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rekberfamous.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
