Channel
@reka_gnilusha
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
93subscribers
+25 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004380824033 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @reka_gnilusha |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 6 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/reka_gnilusha |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 05:02 | 93 | -2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 17:38 | 95 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 96 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:12 | 98 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 22:35 | 99 | +25 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:42 | 74 | +6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 68 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:01 | 68 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
91 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😢 | 26 | 28.6% | |
| ❤ | 25 | 27.5% | |
| 🙏 | 14 | 15.4% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 7.69% | |
| 😭 | 7 | 7.69% | |
| 🤯 | 5 | 5.49% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 4.40% | |
| 💔 | 3 | 3.30% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Десятки мешков с погибшей рыбой/раками/моллюсками мы собираем каждый день. Запах настолько отвратительный, что выворачивает наизнанку. Все берега кишат опарышами. Нет специалистов по оценке масштабов катастрофы, результата анализа воды в реке нет. Нас бросили? Мы готовим коллективный иск.
👍7❤3💔3
Пока бьемся за помощь на нашем участке реки, ниже по течению случается то, что было у нас неделю назад. Клоки пены и отравленная вода уже течет по реке Северка! Долго будем ждать помощи? Долго будут бездействовать власти? Когда наконец заткнут ту дыру, из которой течет эта смерть? Фото сделано в Никоновском.
🤯5😭1
Video, posted without a caption
😢11❤3
Продолжается ликвидация катастрофы силами местных жителей. Очистили небольшую заводь практически полностью. Впереди еще большие объемы. Когда к нам приедет эколог для оценки ущерба? Или мы сами должны справляться? Говна нам налили, сами в нет и утоните. Где проверки СК, когда они сказали что проводится проверка?
❤9🔥2
Местные жители выкладывают видео о ходе работ.
❤7🔥2
К ликвидации нашей катастрофы привлечена «Молодая Гвардия», помогают в очистке берегов от погибшей рыбы, чтобы предотвратить биологическую катастрофу! На улице +31, люди работают в тяжелейший условиях! В сапогах, в респираторах.
🙏14❤3
Сегодня 06.08.2026.Ситуация только ухудшается. Грязь, вонь, мертвая рыба пошла дальше по течению и это все впадает в реку Северка, далее в Москва-реку. Катастрофа набирает обороты.
😭4
Video, posted without a caption
Видео от 04.08.2026
Posted without readable text
Ситуация 03.08. Был выложен пост в социальной сети, видео и фото взяты из группы Рылеево.
😭2
04.08.2026
😢3
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @reka_gnilusha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Экологическая катастрофа реки Гнилуша” (@reka_gnilusha), 93 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/reka_gnilusha.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.