https://blog.naver.com/wlfvndxnwk/223954111771
👎4😭2❤1🤣1

Channel
@reitsoverapt
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
2,356subscribers
-30 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001206384603 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @reitsoverapt |
| Created | 13 April 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/reitsoverapt |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:44 | 2,356 | -6 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 2,362 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 18:56 | 2,364 | -10 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:57 | 2,374 | -3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 2,377 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:24 | 2,380 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:43 | 2,385 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:17 | 2,386 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:08 | 2,386 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
66 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 25 | 37.9% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 21.2% | |
| 🤯 | 9 | 13.6% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 12.1% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 6.06% | |
| 😭 | 4 | 6.06% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 1.52% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 1.52% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 66reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 October 2024 to 31 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://blog.naver.com/wlfvndxnwk/223954111771
👎4😭2❤1🤣1
https://kcgf.kr/53/?q=YToxOntzOjEyOiJrZXl3b3JkX3R5cGUiO3M6MzoiYWxsIjt9&bmode=view&idx=145159552&t=board
👏2
"무능" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fa2YGM9JXEo
자본은 효율적인 곳으로 자연스럽게 흐르기 마련. https://youtu.be/6-jxGuno8xk?si=z4W9lijT5vz8SdWP
<맥쿼리인프라> "주가 하락 이유 점검" 맥쿼리인프라의 주가 하락폭이 커, 시장이 우려하는 내용 위주로 정리해 보았습니다. 2024년 DPS는 760원으로 전년 대비 2% 하락했는데 큰 폭의 하락은 아니지만 2017년 이후 처음으로 배당 정체라는 점에서 실망이 두드러졌던 것으로 판단됩니다. 2024년 5천억원의 유상증자는 역대 최대 규모였다는 점에서 부담이 되었습니다. 이와 함께 수급적 이슈가 겹치며 주가 하락폭이 확대되었습니다. 그러나 10%의 주식수 증가에도 불구, 2024년 하반기 DPS는 상반기와 동일하게 유지되었고 2025년 실시협약 만기인 '백양터널'의 청산 배당 유입 등으로 향후 DPS의 하방은 확보했다고 판단됩니다. 배당수익률은 금일 종가 기준 7.2%로 역대 최고 수준입니다. ■ 체크 포인트 1) 올해 유상증자 가능성은…
❤13👍6
#삼성FN리츠 증자를 무사히 마쳤고, 부채비율은 잘 관리되는 중.
👍1
https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/665/0000004310
👏1
<ETF의 재간접리츠 투자 허용> ETF가 상장 재간접 리츠나 부동산·리츠 ETF에 투자할 수 있게 됩니다. 금일 금융위는 이를 담은 개정안을 입법예고했습니다. 업계 요청 이후 4년만의 일입니다 향후 절차는 규제개혁위원회 심사, 법제처 심사, 차관회의·국무회의 의결을 거쳐 2025년 상반기 중으로 시행됩니다. ETF의 상장재간접리츠 투자 불허의 이유는 이중보수 체계라는점이 컸지만 현재 이지스밸류리츠, 이지스레지던스리츠는 동일 항목에 이중보수를 제거해 운용 중입니다. 금융당국은 편입조건에 이중보수 배제를 담았습니다. 현실적으로 ETF편입 조건이 시총 2천억 이상인만큼 개정시 편입 유력 종목은 이지스밸류리츠입니다. 현재 국내 리츠시장은 ETF 영향력이 큰 만큼 중요 이벤트가 될 것입니다. ☆컴플라이언스 승인을 득했습니다. 리포트) …
👍6❤2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emsmfXg6QXY
오랜만에 짝짝짝!!! https://n.news.naver.com/article/009/0005393445
❤7👏3
https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/ranking/article/015/0005055449?ntype=RANKING
❤1
https://youtu.be/21BNKUNmwvA?si=bEVUdjxNRHYJS5Dh
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @reitsoverapt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
나는 제이알글로벌리츠에 대하여...
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
나는 이번 신한알파 유증에...
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 October 2024 to 31 July 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 367,887 of 1,624,904entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“아대리” (@reitsoverapt), 2,356 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/reitsoverapt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.