Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for α… α… π—‚π—‡π–Ώπ—ˆπ—‹π—†π–Ίπ—π—‚π—ˆπ—‡.α… α… 

Channel

α… α… π—‚π—‡π–Ώπ—ˆπ—‹π—†π–Ίπ—π—‚π—ˆπ—‡.α… α… 

@regulusblacklover

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Posts Β· Polls Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

38subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002778621830
TypeChannel
Username@regulusblacklover
Created27 June 2025 β€” measured β€” dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/regulusblacklover

Growth

3814 Aug 2026, 12:32 β€” 38 subscribers15 Aug 2026, 02:13 β€” 38 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 12:3215 Aug 2026, 02:13
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 37–39 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 02:1338no change
14 Aug 2026, 12:3238first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 27 June 2025 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

21 Oct 2025, 18:00 UTC488 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

❌❌ 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 ❌ 😻 β˜ΊοΈπ—ˆπ—Žπ—‹ π—ˆπ—‰π—‚π—‡π—‚π—ˆπ—‡ 𝖺𝖻𝗍 π—†π–ΎπŸ˜» ✨ 🌟 𝒰 nreasonable hatred ⭐⭐⭐⭐ and spam will be removed. ⭐⭐⭐⭐

21 Oct 2025, 18:00 UTC458 viewsread 14 August 2026

⸝⸝ [ 🀩 ] :: βž–Π°, я кинню РСгулуса Блэка, ΠΈ Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ Π±Ρ‹ я Π½Π΅ Π΄Π΅Π»Π°Π», этого всСгда Π±ΡƒΠ΄Π΅Ρ‚ нСдостаточно. 😻 HarryPotterkinns.t.me

28 Jun 2025, 18:00 UTCβ‰ˆ1,510 viewsread 14 August 2026

❌ ❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌

28 Jun 2025, 18:00 UTCβ‰ˆ1,710 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

πŸ˜€πŸ˜€πŸ˜€πŸ˜€πŸ€'ᡐ πŸ”€πŸ”€πŸ”€ 🐺 πŸ˜€πŸ˜€ πŸ˜€πŸ˜€πŸ˜€πŸ˜€ πŸ˜€πŸ˜€πŸ˜€πŸ˜€πŸ˜€πŸ˜€πŸ˜€πŸ˜€ πŸ˜€πŸ˜€πŸ˜€πŸ˜€π™„π™‰π™π™‹ & C𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘦𝘳π˜ͺ𝘀 & 15cabin 🀩-DAY:: πŸπŸ“.πŸŽπŸ” 🎁 πŸ˜€πŸ˜€πŸ˜€πŸ˜€πŸ˜€πŸ˜€ πŸ˜€πŸ˜€πŸ˜€πŸ˜€πŸ˜€πŸ˜€πŸ˜€πŸ˜€πŸ˜€πŸ˜€ πŸ˜€πŸ˜€ πŒπ€πˆπ π…π€ππƒπŽπŒπ’ : π’Žπ’‚π’“π’‚π’–π’…π’†π’“π’” 𝒆𝒓𝒂 (π’Žπ’π’”π’•π’π’š Β«π’‚π’•π’šπ’…Β», «𝒕𝒄𝒐𝒑𝒕𝒑», «𝒂𝒉𝒃», Β«π’„π’“π’Šπ’Žπ’”π’π’ π’“π’Šπ’—π’†π’“π’”Β» 𝒏𝒅 𝒐𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒔 π’‡π’Šπ’„π’”), 𝒅𝒐𝒄𝒕𝒐𝒓 π’˜π’‰π’, 𝑏𝑏𝑐 π‘ π’‰π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘™π‘œπ‘π‘˜, π‘”π‘œπ‘œπ‘‘ π‘œπ‘šπ‘’π‘›π‘ , π‘ π‘π‘œπ‘‘π‘‘ π‘π‘–π‘™π‘”π‘Ÿπ‘–π‘š, π‘ π‘‘π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘›π‘”π‘’π‘Ÿ 𝑑𝒉𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑠, π‘šπ‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘’ . 🦌 π‹πˆππŠπ’ : π‘‘π‘’π‘™π‘’π‘”π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘π’‰ / π‘Žπ‘›π‘œπ‘› / π‘ π’‰π‘–π‘‘π‘π‘œπ‘ π‘‘ πŸͺ π‘‘π‘–π‘˜π‘‘π‘œπ‘˜ / π‘ π‘π‘Žπ‘π‘’π’‰π‘’π‘¦ / π‘π‘Žπ‘”π‘’ / π‘π‘™π‘Žπ‘¦π‘™π‘–π‘ π‘‘

28 Jun 2025, 18:00 UTCβ‰ˆ1,550 viewsread 14 August 2026

❌ ❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌

28 Jun 2025, 18:00 UTCβ‰ˆ1,630 viewsread 14 August 2026
Poll

πŸ” πŸ€©π—π—ˆ 𝖺𝗋𝖾 π—Ž ? ?

  1. ✨ π—‹π–Ίπ—‡π–½π—ˆπ—† .91%
  2. ✨ 𝗆𝗒 π–»π—‹π—ˆ .8%
  3. ✨ 𝗐𝖺𝗇𝗇𝖺 𝖻𝖾 π–Ώπ—‹π—‚π–Ύπ—‡π–½π—Œ .15%
  4. ✨ π—…π—ˆπ—π–Ύ 𝗆𝖾 π—‹π—ˆπ—†π–Ίπ—‡π—π—‚π–Όπ–Ίπ—…π—…π—’ .10%
  5. ✨ π—Œπ—ˆπ—†π–Ύπ—ˆπ—‡π–Ύ π–Ώπ—‹π—ˆπ—† 𝗍𝗁𝖾 π—‰π–Ίπ—Œπ— .9%

The shares total 133%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

28 Jun 2025, 18:00 UTCβ‰ˆ1,530 viewsread 14 August 2026

❌ ❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌

28 Jun 2025, 18:00 UTCβ‰ˆ1,540 viewsread 14 August 2026

❌ ❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @regulusblacklover. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Jun 2025, 18:00 UTCAnonymous Poll265 voters

πŸ” πŸ€©π—π—ˆ 𝖺𝗋𝖾 π—Ž ? ?

  1. ✨ π—‹π–Ίπ—‡π–½π—ˆπ—† .91%
  2. ✨ 𝗆𝗒 π–»π—‹π—ˆ .8%
  3. ✨ 𝗐𝖺𝗇𝗇𝖺 𝖻𝖾 π–Ώπ—‹π—‚π–Ύπ—‡π–½π—Œ .15%
  4. ✨ π—…π—ˆπ—π–Ύ 𝗆𝖾 π—‹π—ˆπ—†π–Ίπ—‡π—π—‚π–Όπ–Ίπ—…π—…π—’ .10%
  5. ✨ π—Œπ—ˆπ—†π–Ύπ—ˆπ—‡π–Ύ π–Ώπ—‹π—ˆπ—† 𝗍𝗁𝖾 π—‰π–Ίπ—Œπ— .9%

The shares total 133%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only β€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2025 to 21 October 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind β€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank β€” 1,257,129 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions β€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎΠ³ΠΈ
@ResultsTaksa331 Β· 11 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œα… α… π—‚π—‡π–Ώπ—ˆπ—‹π—†π–Ίπ—π—‚π—ˆπ—‡.ᅠᅠ” (@regulusblacklover), 38 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/regulusblacklover.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.