Channel
@regiyulus
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,105subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002684167791 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @regiyulus |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/regiyulus |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:42 | 1,105 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:17 | 1,103 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 1,102 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:35 | 1,102 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
106 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 39 | 36.8% | |
| 🍓 | 23 | 21.7% | |
| 💘 | 21 | 19.8% | |
| 💋 | 7 | 6.60% | |
| 😢 | 6 | 5.66% | |
| 🤩 | 5 | 4.72% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 2.83% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.943% | |
| 👾 | 1 | 0.943% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 106reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 December 2025 to 3 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @regiyulus. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 December 2025 to 3 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
hello! @damagochi is looking for a new mutuals! only accept ART COMMISSION/ART GALLERY/ART RELATED. if you interested, kindly hurl a hi into our helper @damagochibot :] catch ya later~! 𝄞⨾💿✮˚.⋆👾🕹️
😢6❤3
Channel name was changed to «➹ RIELYN ' S : klos !»
Dua tiga adi makan hiu Ayok sekarang jajan di @meropheus! klik link di samping untuk info lebih lanjut 😝 https://t.me/meropheus/13694
eh jelek ditaruh situ, MAKASIH STARNYA KK RILEY PAWANG GIYUU DAN SHEL YOZO MY KISAH😳❤️
❤12
Sticker, posted without a caption
(*ᴗ͈ˬᴗ͈)ꕤ Anime-style simple shad commission
🍓20❤10💘7💋5🐳1🤩1
Love letter from Aeycha. Ku sampaikan ini untuk kalian yang senantiasa menetap di @Exphire. Untuk kalian jika aey pernah melakukan kesalahan yang membuat sakit hati, kecewa ataupun lainnya, aey minta maaf sebesar-besarnya. Dan maaf ada hal-hal yang hanya menjadi wacananya aey saja(╥﹏╥). Feel Grateful for knowing them, friends & mutual terbaik seperti: @fratal, @cookiezycream, @Vien1009, @chisroomz, @luminousy…
💘2
2025 almost ends, I just wanted to say, thank you so much for all my subscribers and all people that have been in my life in these thoughtful years. thank you so much, you all very very precious to me 🥹. We've been through this far, I believe on the next year, will be our best year on our life. and i hope to all my friend and guys here become better at everything. may kindness will always on your side from hardest o…
As for this year has come to an end. Thank you for all of peoples that being part of @chisroomz until now! <3 i cherished you guys so much, semoga 2026 ini dapat banyak perkembangan yang terjadi di diri kita dan dapat meningkatkan diri kita menjadi pribadi yang lebih baik lagii. I wanted to say thank you for all of my mutuals such as: @Cookiezycream @regiyulus @vHaci @Mytrist @TlCTACTOE @ShatteredArt @Lautmmembiru @E…
Before 2025 ends, I would like to give my special thanks to everyone who has been by my side throughout this year. Honestly, I’m really grateful for every moment, support, and presence, whether it was something big or something small. I’m truly sorry if any of my actions, words, or behaviors offended or hurt any of you in any way, intentionally or unintentionally. I’m also sorry if I haven’t been the best mutual this…
This year isnt over yet, but i can already feel it slowing down. Im not trying to romanticize everything that happened because some parts were heavy, messy, and honestly? This year was exhausthing. But i stayed. I learned many things i didnt expect to learn. I met new friends, made achievements, lost some versions of myself and found new ones along the way. Right now, before the countdown, before the fireworks and th…
❤1
YAY, HAPPY NEW YEAR SAYANG SAYANGKU💘💘💘💘 makasih udah nemenin regiyulus sampe akhir tahun 2025 ini!! welkom 2026
💘9❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @regiyulus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 839,610 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@regiyulus named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“➹ RIELYN ' S : klos !” (@regiyulus), 1,105 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/regiyulus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.