Channel
@referendum_app
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,017subscribers
-15 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002319442977 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @referendum_app |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/referendum_app |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:53 | 2,017 | -11 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 2,028 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:21 | 2,032 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:03 | 2,032 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 22 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
82 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 50 | 61.0% | |
| 🔥 | 28 | 34.1% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 3.66% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.22% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 22 April 2025 to 22 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Next stop: Space! 🚀 We are proud to power SERA’s revolutionary mission to send 6 citizens from nations without space programs into orbit! This world-first project is backed by Blue Origin and Ton Blockchain. 🛰️ The most critical part? The selection. To ensure absolute integrity, the Referendum platform will anchor every single vote to the blockchain. ⛓️ No doubts, no manipulations — just pure, transparent democracy…
❤3
🔎 Early partners wanted Have a token—NFT, meme coin, or SBT? We’re inviting projects to pilot Referendum’s upcoming wallet-segmented polls: simple soft governance + a real community voice. What you get • 2-tap polls with holder-only insights • Results split by NFT / coin / SBT groups • Compare your holders with other tribes • Shareable stat cards for X / TG / Discord • Guide roadmap, collabs, events—no DAO overhead…
👍3🔥3❤2
TON Ecosystem Roundup Here’s what’s been cooking in the space! REP: Stage Two Upgrades are live, offering a brand new home screen, updated profiles, real-time achievements, leaderboards, and Social REP graphs. Now your on chain activity defines your digital reputation. Join in and flex your score! Referendum: Tired of noisy Telegram polls and heavy DAO setups? Referendum brings 2-tap, asset-filtered governance whe…
🔥3❤1
🤝Today’s hype: everyone’s talking about a Trump–Putin meeting tomorrow.🇷🇺🇺🇸 🔴🔵Claim the topic first. Create a smart, catchy poll on it and you’ll collect tokens every time someone votes on your poll. No duplicates allowed — the first unique question wins the earnings. ❓Missed the first slot? Still win. If a poll on this topic is already live, share it with friends or in your group and keep earning via your referral…
🔥3❤2
🚨 Big News from Referendum We’re launching a new feature: 💸 Get paid in USDT for every view of your question — not just tokens, but real, withdrawable USDT to your wallet. That’s right. Starting this Fall, asking the right question gets even more rewarding. No games. No delays. Just pure USDT for sparking the world’s biggest debates. 🗳️ Truth pays now.
❤5🔥4
Spooks × Referendum Spooks holders—big news! We’re partnering with Spooks to give every member a clear voice and a brand‑new way to see what our tribe thinks. 👀What’s coming Token‑based results (launching soon) Every public poll on Referendum will break results down by token. You’ll see exactly how Spooks vote—side‑by‑side with Penguins, Goblins, Bears, and any other NFT tribe. 🦹🏻Know your community Discover what …
❤3🔥3
🧐 Growing your Telegram still feels pay‑to‑play: buy shout‑outs, beg bigger channels, or pray your X audience migrates. What if one sharp argument pulled the crowd to you instead? Enter @referendum_app_bot: only one unique vote per topic, every POV stacked in a single feed. Post your take, back it with facts, earn likes and on‑chain tips. Top arguments auto‑boost across all communities, so readers hop straight to yo…
❤4
Ever wondered what your NFT community really thinks? ✨ wapal.io is partnering with @referendum_app so every collection can speak for itself. One link, one tap, and holders see how their own community answers—side-by-side with every rival collection. Penguin: trust bridges more than memes? Spooks: HODL through a 90 % dip? Loonies: buy AI-art? NFTs become more than collectibles — they become your tribe’s voice. Bra…
❤5
The new onboarding flow is ready! Replies, mentions, likes, and other features are almost finished as well.
❤4🔥3
🚀 Earn while you share. Simple as that. Every time you share a poll from Referendum, you earn crypto for every single vote made through your link — no matter who created the poll. No forms. No extra steps. Just pick a poll. Post it. Get paid for the buzz. Yes, even that wild question someone else made last night can earn you rewards. 🔁 Share polls. 💸 Earn from every vote. 🌐 It’s that easy.
🔥3❤2
Did you know there’s an app where you vote like in Squid Game — 🔵🔴 It’s called ☺️ @referendum_app_bot A public voting app where every vote earns you crypto. Almost like Squid Game — but no one gets hurt. Just opinions, on-chain. ✅ Go to settings → change vote style from Yes | No to 🔵🔴 And feel the thrill of high-stakes democracy 🎮
❤4
New drop from Referendum: The Sentiment Index What does your ecosystem really feel right now? Not hype. Not vibes. Real, on-chain sentiment — straight from your holders. Coming soon: ✅ Weekly mood snapshots ✅ Filtered by wallet assets: tokens, NFTs, SBTs, gifts ✅ Topics like: • Bull 🐂 vs Bear 🐻 energy • Web3 optimism 🌐 • AI adoption 🤖 • Gaming vs DeFi 🕹️💰 🧠 How it works: Our AI analyzes thousands of answers from …
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @referendum_app. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 866,249 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Referendum” (@referendum_app), 2,017 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/referendum_app.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.