Channel
@reemalsehli
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,216subscribers
+20 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001707516725 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @reemalsehli |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 19 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/reemalsehli |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 20:18 | 1,216 | +4 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 13:39 | 1,212 | -3 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 06:41 | 1,215 | +5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 16:44 | 1,210 | +2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 1,208 | +6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:27 | 1,202 | +2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:19 | 1,200 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 1,199 | +3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 23:00 | 1,196 | no change |
| 19 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 1,196 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
57 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 40 | 70.2% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 15.8% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 5.26% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 3.51% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 3.51% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 1.75% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 57 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
خلف كل إنجاز💫 بعد فضل الله وتوفيقه أم دعت بـ:"الله يوفقك" وأب دعم وشجع بلا حدود وأخوة وأخوات تحملوا غيابك وأولاد صبروا على انشغالك.. وصحبة صادقة شدت من أزرك لسنا وحدنا.. والحمدلله وشكراً لكل دعوة وسؤال ودعم من كل أحد..🪻
❤3
Signed ريم
العلم يرفع بيتاً كان منخفضاً والجهل يخفضه لو كان ما كانا 🌱📚🌱 العِلم يجلو العَمَى عن قلبِ صاحبِه كما يُجلِّي سوادَ الظُّلمةِ القمَرُ وليس ذو العِلمِ بالتَّقوى كجاهِلِها ولا البَصيرُ كأعمَى ما له بَصَرُ
❤2
Signed ريم
"البحثُ في العلمِ جهاد " معاذ بن الجبل رضي الله عنه
❤2
Signed ريم
مابين الواقع والتخيلات : منذ عام تقريبا كان آخر عهدي بتطبيق السناب نظراً لتزاحم الأشغال وتقديم الأهم؛ أخذت لنفسي فسحة قبل عدة أيام وتنقلت بين الحسابات النافعة الهادفة ووقفت عند هذه القصة لباحثة طموحة وأم مميزة ودكتورة ملهمة قصص الباحث وتحديات العصر تختلف في تفاصيلها وتشترك في خطوطها العريضة.. قد يجد كل منا نفسه في جوانب من هذه القصة وربما أشد صعوبة وأقوى تحديات أو أقل من ذلك؛ لكن بالتأكيد أن لا أحد منا يخلو في هذ…
👍4❤2🔥1
Signed ريم
"تخيّل لو أنك ضعفت قبل قدوم الفتح بقليل فتهجر ثغرك، وتُغادر تلتك، وترفع يدك!وأنتَ لا تدري أنها آخر شوكة قبل الثمرة وآخر سُنبلة يابسة قبل الوفرة، وآخر ليلة بالبئر قبل الوارد..! قِف وانهض وذكّر قلبك:🍁 «المؤمن هو المُتحامل، والمؤمن هو المتقوّي». ومساء الخير والنور والسرور والورد المنثور كما تقول أمي دائماً ..
❤5🔥1
Signed ريم
ينظّم معهد إيفاد للكفاءة الأكاديميّة والمهنيّة محاضرة علميّة بعنوان ❰ ما لا يُقال للباحثين في مناهج البحث: التحدّيات الخفيّة في الممارسة البحثيّة ❱ ▪︎ يوم الجمعة ١٧ صفر ١٤٤٧هـ ٣١ يوليو ٢٠٢٦ 🕤 تبدأ الساعة ٩.٣٠ مساءً الشهادة ❰ شهادة حضور ❱ 🔗 لحضور المحاضرة https://join.freeconferencecall.com/ifad كلمة المرور IFAD
❤2👍1
Signed ريم
هذه محاضرةٌ نافعةٌ لفضيلة شيخنا المُحَدِّث الكبير الدكتور إبراهيم اللاحم، حفظه الله ورعاه، بعنوان: «مهارات توظيف النقول في البحوث العِلميَّة»، وهو موضوعٌ مُبتَكَرٌ حريٌّ بعناية الباحثين به. وهذه المحاضرة قديمةٌ جديدةٌ؛ وذلك أنَّ الشيخ ألقاها وسُجِّلَتْ قبل ثلاثة عشر عامًا تقريبًا، ولكن العجيب أنَّ تسجيلها لم يُنشَر على اليوتيوب إلا قبل بضعة أشهر من الآن، فلا يزال شيخنا -نفعنا الله به- بحرًا لا ينضب! وقد سعدت بها و…
👍3
Signed ريم
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed ريم
وحاوطني يارب بالطيبين الصالحين المخلصين واجعلني منهم، وارزقني حُبك وحُب من يحبُك، ولا تجعل في دربي إلا من دلني عليك، وأبعد عني كل قلب زائف، وكل نفس مؤذية ✨.
❤6
Signed ريم
فنار منارة العلماء.. وملاذ العقول #جامعة الملك سعود
Signed ريم
#البحث_العلمي #التسجيل في الجامعة الإسلامية بالمدينة المنورة
Signed ريم
#اشراقة🌊 صباح الخير... وبعد: فإن الباحث كبحر...في هدوئه عمق ... وفي صبره إنجاز🍂
👏3⚡1
Signed ريم
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @reemalsehli. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“إشراقة باحثة 📝” (@reemalsehli), 1,216 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/reemalsehli.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.