Channel
@reels_july
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,751subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 1 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002153429676 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @reels_july |
| Created | Between 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 1 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/reels_july |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Oct 2026, 22:36 | 1,751 | no change |
| 1 Oct 2026, 00:22 | 1,751 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 24 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
308 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 125 | 40.6% | |
| ❤ | 111 | 36.0% | |
| 👍 | 46 | 14.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 14 | 4.55% | |
| 🥰 | 10 | 3.25% | |
| 🆒 | 2 | 0.649% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 308 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 24 November 2024 to 1 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
❤️КАНАЛ ЗАКРЫВАЕТСЯ Девочки, привет! Этот канал закрывается, он отработал свою задачу. Если вам интересно развитие блога, заработок онлайн и создание видео на миллионы просмотров, добавляйтесь в мой основной канал 👇 https://t.me/galinamiami_reels Всё дальнейшее общение, активности, разборы, еженедельные рубрики и интересности будут там 😍❤️
❤8
Если вы тратите на съем роликов больше 30 минут, значит, вы точно делаете это неправильно! 🤯 Девочки, если бы у меня на снятие роликов уходило по пол дня, я бы сама уже нафиг бросила этим заниматься!🙈 Понимаю, когда у вас опускаются руки от такого. Мы все с вами взрослые женщины, у нас семья, мужья, дети, дом, работа, домашние животные и так далее. Для нас непозволительная роскошь тратить на короткие ролики так мно…
❤23🔥7👍3
Video, posted without a caption
❤🔥12
Секрет, который позволил мне так быстро набрать больше 1,5 миллионов аудитории и стать крупным блогером 🤫 Если бы я набирала аудиторию через рекламу, то мне пришлось бы вложить в рекламу больше 200 миллионов рублей 😱😱😱 (стоимость подписчика сейчас от 150руб, и это если реклама хорошо сработала) Но я ни вложила в развития блога ни рубля 😍 Хотите знать, как я это сделала? У меня есть секретный рецепт рилс на миллион…
🔥17❤9👍3
Как по шагам снять рилс/клип, который наберет много просмотров и приведет новых подписчиков в блог…
❤13👍11
Интенсив и челлендж - абсолютно разные и прекрасно дополняют друг друга. В челлендже много практики, он более глубокий, там я даю рецепт и структуру видео на миллион просмотров и показываю как такие видео монтировать, выкладывать, привожу много примеров.
🔥8👍3❤2
Здравствуйте! А если проходила ноябрьский интенсив есть смысл идти на челлендж? Или будут совпадения?
Уже совсем скоро 🔥🔥🔥
🔥11❤4
Пэсси вам передает «Ставь будильник, не пропусти такой шанс в черную пятницу» 🔥🔥🔥
❤18🥰10
Video message, posted without a caption
❤6👍2
Кому подойдет челлендж 😍 Супер-цена на него будет только 1 день в черную пятницу 29 ноября🔥
❤12🔥7🆒1
Девочки, готовлю для вас сюрприз на черную пятницу на тему развития блога и коротких видео 🔥🔥🔥 Для всех, у кого не получилось в этот раз попасть на курс. Но блог развивать желание есть. Как вам идея? 🔥👇
🔥67👍5❤3❤🔥2🆒1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @reels_july. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Вебинар про Reels 19 ноября 2024” (@reels_july), 1,751 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/reels_july.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.