2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 279–281 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Nov 2026, 13:22
280
no change
9 Nov 2026, 12:47
280
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 6 November 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
57.2%
avg views ÷ 280 subscribers
Avg views / post
160
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held
15 (6 November 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total
2,403
Reactions total
250
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Nov 2026, 13:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
43
Videos
2
Links
11
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
250 reactions across 14 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5215481467315978980
48
19.2%
custom 5213461161944578801
42
16.8%
custom 5429308613170590563
39
15.6%
custom 5253524539572246314
26
10.4%
custom 5303346323414621427
22
8.80%
custom 5204264125135358259
19
7.60%
custom 5422704031506143903
14
5.60%
custom 5463016040495607509
11
4.40%
custom 5197554565880243927
9
3.60%
custom 5332285353493564352
7
2.80%
🎃
6
2.40%
custom 5197240539346401185
2
0.8%
custom 5411591894549439956
2
0.8%
custom 5332495836955840497
1
0.4%
custom 5429214690825760711
1
0.4%
🔥
1
0.4%
Custom emoji. 14 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 250 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 6 November 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
96
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 15 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
80
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @reedxss. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 November 2026 to 9 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (33.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Охаё-даттебаё! На связи Кяроши📞
Закончила вот такой заказ на арт, вошло вполне даже нормик ну или я хз.👅
Стараюсь сейчас учить анатомию мужского тела, а особенно накаченных, ведь таких персонажей куда больше чем хрупких мальчишек которых я только и умею рисовать, хах..🐾
🌟Он по идее лежит в воде, пыталась сделать похоже с рефа, примерно чет да получилось.😉
🎀ᴩᴏsᴛ frᴏʍ: @Krakushkar
🌟🌟ᴛᴋɢ ᴀᴅᴍ: @kyaroshy
🌟#newpost …
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🔹ктив.
#собственник #sobstvennik
🤩 - . 🧁🧁🧁 -`.┋🧁┋
🔤оворю для тех кто пришел в канал, если не хотите активить ибо как то помогать развивать и поддерживать канал своим участием в нём то прошу выйти! 🚬
Мб продам за 70-150 звёзд.
🚬🚬🚬 - бля эйфория какая-то из-за понедельника и целой недели работы, хочу новый год.. Я в него тоже работаю но там меньше смены
+Продаю юз - есть сигны @Volter_Faun
🚬🔹𝒆ׅ𝐰 🔠᥆s𝗍 🚬🚬
🚬ㅤ➿➿ 🚬🚬
🤩 открываю мини конкурс на сигны -.. 🎁
➿➿➿➿➿➿➿
#sobstvennik #сигны #мини конкурс
𓈒 ֻུ᷐࣪🧁⏜ؙᮬ᷒ᰰִ ᮢ˖ ⁽ 🤩 ⁾ -🎁. 🔤🔤🔤
🤩- 🔤уть этого конкурса -
🤩 1. Вы делаете сигну и
🤩скидываете мне её : @sxowz / http://t.me/anonaskbot?start=4aebb / под пост
🤩 2. 🔤 выбираю лучшую сигну и ставлю её на профиль + 25 ✨ Человеку который мне её сделал!
(🔤стальные сигны я добавлю в канал с вашими работами🎁)
- 🧁🧁🧁 -
🧁- 🧁🧁🧁
Э𝒄т𝒂ф𝒆та..
🧁🧁 - 🧁
в чем суть?
ваша задача найти фото 5 вещей:
• прическа
• палитра
• эстетика
• предмет
• стиль одежды
из первых фоток вы делаете небольшой мудборд, по которому уже делается сама ос(ос можно делать в любой гаче)
условия:
1.не изменять текст
2. автор @cydzyne
3.передать не менее двум людям
передаю эстафету:
@ffogKomi (нуара)
@Mona_zzw (Мона)
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @reedxss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 6 November 2026 to 9 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐶обс𝑐тв'𝑒нни𝑘” (@reedxss), 280 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/reedxss.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
