Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for REEDLAW - IBC, Bankruptcy & Banking Laws Gazette

Channel

REEDLAW - IBC, Bankruptcy & Banking Laws Gazette

@reedlaw

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Cite this entry

197subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001250573154
TypeChannel
Username@reedlaw
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/reedlaw

Growth

197200198.57 August 2026 — 200 subscribers8 August 2026 — 200 subscribers16 August 2026 — 198 subscribers25 August 2026 — 197 subscribers7 August 202625 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 17 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 197–200 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 00:54197-1
16 Aug 2026, 21:03198-2
8 Aug 2026, 11:32200no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:13200first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

2 Mar 2026, 12:35 UTC108 viewsread 8 August 2026

Section 7 IBC – RBI Framework or Prior Dismissal No Bar to Admission | NCLAT REEDLAW Legal News Network reports: In a significant ruling on the scope of Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, the Appellate Tribunal reaffirmed that once financial debt and default are established under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, the Adjudicating Authority is mandatorily required to admit the

26 Feb 2026, 11:29 UTC81 viewsread 8 August 2026

Section 7 IBC Cannot Be Defeated by Pending or Informal Restructuring Absent Written Amendment of Debenture Trust Deed REEDLAW Legal News Network reports: The Supreme Court clarified the scope of insolvency admission under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, holding that pending or informal restructuring discussions cannot defeat initiation of the corporate insolvency resolution process when finan

20 Feb 2026, 08:19 UTC74 viewsread 8 August 2026

Section 7 IBC Admission Mandatory Upon Default – Corporate Debtor’s Viability Irrelevant | Supreme Court REEDLAW Legal News Network reports: In a significant reaffirmation of the settled law governing admission of insolvency petitions, the Supreme Court held that once the existence of a financial debt and occurrence of default are established under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, the Adjudicat

17 Feb 2026, 12:59 UTC55 viewsread 8 August 2026

Section 95 IBC Proceedings Against Personal Guarantors Valid Once Corporate Debtor Default Is Finalised REEDLAW Legal News Network reports: In a significant ruling on personal guarantor insolvency, the Appellate Tribunal reaffirmed that once default of a Corporate Debtor has been conclusively established and has attained finality under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, insolvency proceedings aga

16 Feb 2026, 10:46 UTC54 viewsread 8 August 2026

Contract Termination for Pre-CIRP Breaches Not Barred by Section 14 Moratorium | NCLAT REEDLAW Legal News Network reports: In a significant ruling on the limits of moratorium protection under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, the Appellate Tribunal held that termination of a contract founded on pre-CIRP contractual breaches and performance deficiencies, and not triggered solely by insolvency, is not barred b

13 Feb 2026, 11:25 UTC47 viewsread 8 August 2026

Personal Insolvency Proceedings Under Section 95 IBC Require Prior Invocation of Guarantee: NCLAT The REEDLAW Legal News Network reports: In a significant ruling on personal guarantor insolvency, the NCLAT clarified that insolvency proceedings against a personal guarantor under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, cannot be initiated unless the guarantee is first invoked in accordance with the contractual terms

12 Feb 2026, 05:06 UTC43 viewsread 8 August 2026

Admission of Personal Insolvency Proceedings Without Considering Reply Violates Principles of Natural Justice: NCLAT REEDLAW Legal News Network reports: In a significant ruling, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal set aside the admission of personal insolvency proceedings after finding that the Adjudicating Authority proceeded on an erroneous premise that no reply had been filed and failed to consider submis

11 Feb 2026, 10:34 UTC38 viewsread 8 August 2026

Contingent Rights Under Property-Linked Agreements Do Not Create Enforceable Claims in CIRP: NCLAT REEDLAW Legal News Network reports: In a significant ruling clarifying the scope of admissible claims in insolvency proceedings, the NCLAT held that contingent rights arising from property-linked collaboration and assignment agreements cannot be treated as enforceable debts in the corporate insolvency resolution proces

9 Feb 2026, 07:13 UTC38 viewsread 8 August 2026

Leasehold Rights Transferred by Amalgamation Constitute Liquidation Estate Assets under IBC REEDLAW Legal News Network reports: In a significant ruling on the scope of liquidation estates under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal reaffirmed that leasehold rights lawfully vested in a Corporate Debtor constitute intangible assets capable of being controlled and sold du

8 Feb 2026, 10:51 UTC35 viewsread 8 August 2026

Violation of Companies Act Deposit Provisions Cannot Defeat Section 7 IBC Proceedings Where Financial Debt Is Established REEDLAW Legal News Network reports: In a significant ruling on the scope of financial debt under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and interface between the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and the Companies Act, 2013, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal clarified that interes

5 Feb 2026, 09:56 UTC33 viewsread 8 August 2026

Misuse of IBC Through Asset Undervaluation and Pre-Planned Auctions: Supreme Court Flags Systemic Abuse and Bank Collusion REEDLAW Legal News Network reports: In a significant hearing highlighting systemic concerns within India’s insolvency framework, the Supreme Court expressed serious reservations over the increasing misuse of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, particularly instances where corporate assets

4 Feb 2026, 13:59 UTC29 viewsread 8 August 2026

Section 10A Bar Does Not Defeat Section 9 Proceedings When Pre-Suspension Defaults Independently Cross IBC Threshold: NCLAT REEDLAW Legal News Network reports: In a decisive ruling on the scope of Section 10A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, the Appellate Tribunal clarified that exclusion of an isolated invoice falling within the COVID-19 suspension period does not defeat an operational creditor’s right to ini

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @reedlaw. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“REEDLAW - IBC, Bankruptcy & Banking Laws Gazette” (@reedlaw), 197 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/reedlaw.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.