Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Red Pepper Film

Channel

Red Pepper Film

@redpepperfilm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,426subscribers

+17 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001097159244
TypeChannel
Username@redpepperfilm
Created27 December 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/redpepperfilm

Growth

3,4093,4313,4206 August 2026 — 3,409 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,409 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,411 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,425 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,431 subscribers15 August 2026 — 3,426 subscribers3,4266 August 202615 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 9 days, net +17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,406–3,434 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 12:573,426-5
12 Aug 2026, 03:123,431+6
9 Aug 2026, 03:113,425+14
6 Aug 2026, 10:013,411+2
6 Aug 2026, 04:453,409no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:063,409first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
45.8%
avg views ÷ 3,426 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,570
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held11 (28 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total17,247
Reactions total274
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

233 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10645.5%
❤‍🔥4117.6%
custom 51952656575491255523213.7%
🔥2410.3%
custom 5195228480312214430208.58%
🎉83.43%
🕊20.858%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 274reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 11 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @redpepperfilm. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 16:29 UTC189 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

14❤‍🔥11🔥7

7 Aug 2026, 07:33 UTC263 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

14custom 51952656575491255525🔥4

6 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC314 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @kinoprotebyaPhoto

🖤 постеры недели 〰️〰️〰️ ⚪️ «МАМ» — Дарья Екамасова и Елена Николаева на обновлённом постере 11-минутной короткометражки Ивана Соснина и @redpepperfilm x @sverdlovskfilmstudio, которая после ММКФ и «Зеркала» отправляется в очередной фестивальный вояж: в августе фильм покажут на фестивале «Восток&Запад. Классика и Авангард» (Оренбург), в октябре — на фестивале импакт-кино «ЛАМПА» (Пермь). ⚪️ «ГУДОВЫ» — новая семе

❤‍🔥6🎉64custom 51952656575491255522

6 Aug 2026, 09:09 UTC≈1,080 views53 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

19❤‍🔥18custom 51952284803122144309custom 51952656575491255527

5 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTC431 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Андрей Ургант представил «Далёкие близкие» в Выборге! В первый день кинофестиваля «Окно в Европу» показали наше доброе кино. Премьера «Далёких близких» четыре года назад состоялась на этом же фестивале. Андрей Львович сыграл в фильме Вову, друга главного героя Бориса, и мы очень рады, что у него получилось приехать на показ. Ловите фотографии с показа от Сергея Комарова ❤️

10custom 51952656575491255524🔥3custom 51952284803122144301

5 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC≈11,500 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Представляем новый постер короткого метра «МАМ»! Наш совместный со Свердловской киностудией фильм можно будет посмотреть здесь: 📍 XIX Международный кинофестиваль «Восток&Запад. Классика и Авангард», Оренбург 21–27 августа · конкурс короткого метра «Шаг» 📍 Московская международная неделя кино, Москва 24–30 августа · программа показов 📍 Казанский международный кинофестиваль «Алтын Минбар», Казань 4–8 сентября · вне

12custom 51952656575491255524🎉2custom 51952284803122144302

3 Aug 2026, 10:58 UTC478 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Смотрите «Далекие близкие» в Выборге! Уже завтра на кинофестивале «Окно в Европу» покажут наш тёплый роуд-муви в рамках программы «Новые добрые». 📅 4 августа 20:00, Летний зал Полная программа — https://oknofest.com/ А сегодня ровно 5 лет со старта съёмок полнометражного дебюта нашего режиссёра Вани Соснина! Этот фильм нам очень дорог, мы с трепетом вспоминаем съёмки и будем рады полному залу на показе ❤️

12🔥10custom 51952284803122144305custom 51952656575491255522

1 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC613 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Август — последний месяц лета! Не хочется отпускать, поэтому забирайте лето с собой. Собрали для вас обои-календарики на август: здесь моменты лета от нашей команды. Дома, облака, туман над полем — выбирайте, что ближе и ставьте на телефон!

9custom 51952656575491255528custom 51952284803122144303

30 Jul 2026, 10:46 UTC≈1,240 views20 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

RPF X ФПРК: монтажная лаборатория Поговорили с режиссёром монтажа Катей Труба о её опыте наставника монтажной лаборатории ФПРК. Читайте в карточках. Монтаж короткометражек уже завершен, фильмы отправляются на фестивали, а мы ждём премьер!

12❤‍🔥6🕊2

29 Jul 2026, 07:02 UTC≈619 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

«Далёкие близкие» возвращаются в Выборг! Дебютный фильм Ивана Соснина вошёл во внеконкурсную программу «Новые добрые» 34-го кинофестиваля «Окно в Европу». Этот показ для нас особенно важен: четыре года назад в Выборге прошла премьера «Далёких близких». Тогда фильм получил приз за лучший сценарий и победил в зрительском голосовании «Выборгский счёт». Вместе с нашим роуд-муви в Выборге покажут восемь картин участник

28 Jul 2026, 09:18 UTC≈520 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @okkomoviesPhoto

Детективный сериал «ПОХИЩЕНИЕ», история об ожившей игрушке «ПЕТРУШКА» и милый альманах «ТЮЛЬПАНЫ». Делимся новинками недели в нашем дайджесте. 😆 Мы в MAX | Смотрите Okko прямо сейчас

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @redpepperfilm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 9,541 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Red Pepper Film” (@redpepperfilm), 3,426 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/redpepperfilm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.