Password: rednexus
🌭3🔥1

Channel
@rednexus1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
9,451subscribers
+39 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002224470933 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rednexus1 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rednexus1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:07 | 9,451 | +6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:32 | 9,445 | +33 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:25 | 9,412 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 9,412 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (23 June 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 30,420 |
| Reactions total | 414 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
724 reactions across 22 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 552 | 76.2% | |
| 🔥 | 43 | 5.94% | |
| 😢 | 38 | 5.25% | |
| 💘 | 37 | 5.11% | |
| ❤🔥 | 15 | 2.07% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 1.24% | |
| 😱 | 8 | 1.10% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 0.829% | |
| 🌭 | 3 | 0.414% | |
| 💋 | 3 | 0.414% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 0.414% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.276% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 0.276% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 0.138% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.138% | |
| 👾 | 1 | 0.138% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 724reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rednexus1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 June 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Password: rednexus
🌭3🔥1
Video, posted without a caption
❤6🍌1💘1🔥1
دا Loader بسيط لتخطي Windows defender يقدر يفتح Reverse shell بدون مايتكشف علي ويندوز 10 و 11 وتقدر تحط اي اده مثل Mimikatz وتشغلها عليه منغير ماتتكشف ايضا لو عندك اقتراح للتطوير نرحب بذلك كثيرا تواصل مباشر معنا #rednexus #loader #maldev #malware_development #loader
🔥5😍3👍1💘1
منتظرين حضراتكم في المناقشة علي google meet وبرضو هيتم البث ومفتحين علي جميع اسئلة حضراتكم ونقاشتكم https://meet.google.com/uus-amcw-dun سيتم البث مباشر وستكون المحاضرة مسجلة علي يوتيوب https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5cKxsNkY9yU
💘4❤3
ان شاء الله موجودين معاكم اليوم الخميس الساعه ٩ مساءا بتوقيت القاهرة للاجابة علي اسئلة حضرتكم وخصوصا طلبة ثانوية العامة اللي داخلين كليات الفترة الحالية جهزوا اسئلتكم وهتكون معاكم خطوة بخطوة ان شاء الله ونحاول نزيل التشتت عن الشباب الفترة الحالية الميتنج هيكون علي Google meet وهيتم بثه مباشر وهيتسجل علي يوتيوب بالتوفيق للجميع ان شاء الله
❤21❤🔥2💘1
اعتذار واجب احيان كتير هيظهر لحضرتك اعلانات منبثقة في الصفحه وانت بتشاهد المنشورات دي مش احنا المتسببين فيها والله دا تليجرام نفسه وكل اللي رجع من الاعلانات دي من يوم تأسيس القناة لا يتخطي ٨٠ سنت يعني ٤٠ جنيه مصري ولو مليون جنيه من الاعلانات الحرام ف الله الغني عنهم بالنسبة لالغاء الإعلانات مش في أيدينا والله بتتلغي لما نوصل مستوي ٥٠ ودا بياخد وقت كبير جدا من الدعم وبنعتذر مرة أخري
❤62💘3
في مغالطة كبيرة موجودة حاليا اني علشان اذكي واحد فانا هشتغل الاول وهاخد اعلي مرتب علشان الباقي كلهم مبيفهموش يسعدني اقولك ذكائك ده مش هيفيدك في حياتك بدون مجهود المجهود هو المعيار الاول في النجاح والوصول للهدف - علشان كده دايما بنقول الاجتهاد في عدد ساعات الشغل والتدريب والمذاكرة اهم حاجه ثانيا في نقطه صعبه حاليا هي الخوف من الاستثمار في الذات - اخرج خروجه مع صحابي اصرف فيها اكتر من اللي كنت ممكن اصرفه علي اشتراك hac…
❤27🥰4❤🔥3💘2🔥1
https://youtu.be/Sx0-_UrHots استخدام AI في مجال Bug Bounty و حل لابات HTB اتمني الفيديو ينول رضاكم وان شاء الله هنعمل سلسله فيديوهات قريبة عن AI Security # rednexus #ai #bugbounty #bugbountytips #hackerone #bugcrowd #yeswehack
❤22💘6👍5👎1🔥1
https://meet.google.com/uis-ggug-itb لينك المييتنج للنقاش وتم البث والتسجيل علي يوتيوب https://www.youtube.com/live/UYOL6Ukt1VY?si=oVycIkQg5qyRS9id
❤7💘2🔥1
ان شاء الله طالعين اليوم لايف الساعه 10 مساءا بعد انقطاع اكثر من عام كامل لنهنئ اخواتنا في الثانويةالعامه اولا ثانيا لنرسم خارطة الطريق امام اي شخص لسه داخل سيكيورتي ثالثا نحاول نلغي التشتت عند شباب كتير الفترة الحالية رابعا نجاوب علي كل أسئلة حضراتكم خامسا نتكلم علي الموضوع الاهم الفتره الحاليه هو AI security ومستقبله الفتره الحاليه يريت حضراتكم تجهزوا كل اسئلتكم للسهرة اليوم ان شاء الله هيتم البث علي يوتيوب وGoogle…
❤24❤🔥7💘3
ابعت الفيديو ده لاي حد لسه مخلص ثالثه ثانوي أن شاء الله يفيده https://youtu.be/tGi4qAhy6PU?si=NB1NdEOPfQJM4Wtv
❤17💋3🔥3
تم الانتهاء من تسجيل دورة Android Application Penetration Testing باعلي مستوي هتشوفه حاليا ومستقبلا باذن الله وتقسيمه الي Static Analysis - Dynamic Analysis وتم دمج وحل اكثر من 100 لاب وبرنامج ومايقترب من 100 محاضرة علي مدار الدورة ليكون مستوي الدورة من الصفر وصولا لBug bounty او Penetration Testing و تم تغطية جميع اجزاء دورة Emapt بشكل كامل ويزيد سيتم الاعلان عن الدورة فور الانتهاء من مونتاج الخاص بها انتظرونا قريب…
❤72😱8🔥7👍2👏2💘2👾1
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @rednexus1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 96,619 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Red Nexus” (@rednexus1), 9,451 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rednexus1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.