Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for REDLlNE(ردلاین)

Channel

REDLlNE(ردلاین)

@redlinekoonkor

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

137subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 11 October 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004293312000
TypeChannel
Username@redlinekoonkor
Created9 October 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded11 October 2026
Last confirmed live13 October 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/redlinekoonkor

Growth

13713913811 October 2026 — 139 subscribers13 October 2026 — 137 subscribers11 October 202613 October 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 137–139 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Oct 2026, 22:56137-2
11 Oct 2026, 16:22139first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 9 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
80.1%
avg views ÷ 137 subscribers
Avg views / post
110
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.72%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 October 2026
Posts held11 (9 October 2026 – 11 October 2026)
Views total878
Reactions total59
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Oct 2026, 16:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

59 reactions across 8 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 93.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤5593.2%
👍46.78%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 9 October 2026 to 11 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Oct 2026, 15:42 UTC21 views5 reactionsread 11 October 2026

🔴⚡ فیزیک کنکور از نگاه REDLINE سلام به همگی! 👋🏻❤️ من اسامه رمضانی هستم و توی این پست می‌خوام از تجربه شخصی خودم در درس فیزیک کنکور براتون بگم؛ از منابعی که استفاده کردم تا نحوه مطالعه و مدیریت زمان در جلسه کنکور. 💪🏻 📊 عملکرد من در درس فیزیک: 🔥 درصد فیزیک کنکور: ۸۹٪ 💯 نمره امتحان نهایی فیزیک: ۲۰ از ۲۰ 📚 از چه منابعی استفاده کردم؟ 🥇 ۱. فیزیک نشر الگو نشر الگو منبع اول من برای فیزیک بود و بخش اصلی مطالعه‌ام رو با این من…

❤5

11 Oct 2026, 12:11 UTC73 views7 reactionsread 11 October 2026

🧬🔴 بررسی آزمون زیست‌شناسی ماز از نگاه ردلاین بریم سراغ یکی از شناخته‌شده‌ترین آزمون‌های زیست‌شناسی کنکور! 🔥🤩 ✅ نقاط قوت آزمون ماز 💚 به نظر من، آزمون زیست ماز یکی از کامل‌ترین آزمون‌های زیست‌شناسیه که می‌تونید در طول مسیر کنکور شرکت کنید. 💯🧬 🔹 تقریباً تمام نکات کتاب درسی رو پوشش می‌ده و حتی گاهی نکاتی رو مطرح می‌کنه که تا الان در کنکور سراسری مورد سؤال قرار نگرفتن. این موضوع می‌تونه روحیه‌ی کنجکاوی و قدرت تحلیل دا…

❤7

10 Oct 2026, 21:10 UTC103 views10 reactionsread 11 October 2026
Photo

🧬 آزمون زیست قلمچی تنوع طراحی خوبی داره و پوشش نکاتش قابل قبوله، اما نمی‌شه گفت بهترین آزمونه! 🔴 سطح آزمون‌ها در طول سال یکسان نیست و گاهی اختلاف سطح سؤالات زیاده. 📚 پاسخنامه هم نکات خوبی داره و اخیراً روند رو به بهبودی داشته. ✅ در نهایت، با تحلیل منظم و اصولی می‌تونید از این آزمون برای افزایش تسلطتون روی زیست استفاده کنید. ردلاین؛ فراتر از آزمون دادن، تحلیل کن! 🔴 🔴 REDLINE | مسیر رتبه‌های برتر #زیست #آزمون

❤6👍4

10 Oct 2026, 19:36 UTC120 views6 reactionsread 11 October 2026
Photo

🟢📗 در درس زیست: 📚ماز بزن اگه دنبال یه ازمون پایداری که پیشرفتت رو باهاش بررسی کنی 📚ارمان بزن اگه دنبال نکات تازه تری هستی 📚زیستاز پیشرفته بزن اگه دنبال یه ازمون سخت و سطح بالا هستی 📚قلمچی بزن اگه دنبال ازمونی هستی که در طول سال سطوح و سبک های مختلفی رو امتحان می کنه اینا تجمیع نکات مثبت ازمون های مطرح زیست بودند در بخش بعدی هر ازمون رو زیر ذره بین قرار می دیم😊😁☺ 🔴 REDLINE | مسیر رتبه‌های برتر #زیست #آزمون

❤6

10 Oct 2026, 18:25 UTC134 views7 reactionsread 11 October 2026

درباره مطالعه زیست برای 20 نهایی 🌿 (قسمت1⃣) اهمیت نهایی ها و اثری که ۰/۲۵ به ویژه در دروس پر ضریبی مثل زیست و ادبیات می تونه بزاره بر کسی پوشیده نیست⚠️ حالا این سوال پیش می اد برای مطالعه زیست مختص نهایی چیکار کنیم که نمره مورد نظرمون رو تضمین کنیم❓ 🟢نکته اول: مطالعه برای امتحانات نهایی از کنکور جدا نیست. در هردو مورد چه درصد بالا و چه نمره کامل نهایی پیش نیاز تسلط بر متن کتابه📚 کسی که متن کتاب رو در ذهن نداره توانا…

❤7

10 Oct 2026, 16:29 UTC137 views11 reactionsread 11 October 2026

🔴 سلام به همگی! 👋🏻❤️ می‌خوام توی این پست از تجربه‌ی خودم در درس زیست‌شناسی و روش مطالعه‌ای که داشتم براتون بگم. 🧬 📊 اول از همه، درصد زیست‌شناسی من در کنکور ۸۰٪ بود که با توجه به سختی و سطح زیست امسال، نتیجه‌ی خیلی خوبی محسوب می‌شد. 🔥 اما چقدر زیست می‌خوندم؟ 🤔 جواب ساده‌ست؛ زیاد می‌خوندم! 🤗😂 اما زیاد خوندن به‌تنهایی مهم نیست؛ چیزی که اهمیت داره، چگونگی خوندنه! 😁 خب، بریم سراغ روش مطالعه‌م! 👇🏻 🧬 ۱. شروع مطالعه‌ی…

❤11

10 Oct 2026, 10:25 UTC131 views6 reactionsread 11 October 2026

ژیوار محمودی هستم👦 رتبه ۲۷۹ منطقه۳💣 می خواهم که تجربیات سه سال این مسیر پرفراز و نشیب رو با شما در میان بزارم🙂

❤6

10 Oct 2026, 10:16 UTC159 views7 reactionsread 11 October 2026

اسامه رمضانی هستم👦 رتبه ۱۱۰ منطقه۳💣 دوست دارم روش‌ها و سختی‌هایی‌رو که در این مسیر طولانی و سخت مزه کردم رو با شما در میان بزارم🤕❤️🫠

❤7

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @redlinekoonkor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“REDLlNE(ردلاین)” (@redlinekoonkor), 137 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/redlinekoonkor.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.