Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Разные стороны Рыжей | Лина Кайлас | 18+

@redbookwriter

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,099subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001984753766
TypeChannel
Username@redbookwriter
Created1 September 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/redbookwriter

Growth

3,0997 Aug 2026, 03:48 — 3,099 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 00:51 — 3,099 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 03:488 Aug 2026, 00:51
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,096–3,102 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 00:513,099no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:483,099first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.39%
avg views ÷ 3,099 subscribers
Avg views / post
73.9
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held16 (28 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,183
Reactions total139
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

139 reactions across 16 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3625.9%
👍2618.7%
2014.4%
❤‍🔥128.63%
🕊107.19%
👀64.32%
🤣53.60%
🥰53.60%
😁42.88%
🙈42.88%
😈32.16%
👌21.44%
👏21.44%
🤯21.44%
🌚10.719%
💘10.719%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 139reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @redbookwriter. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC31 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @stydy_eliPhoto

Дежавю. Странное, неуловимое ощущение, будто ты уже переживал этот момент, видел эту картину, слышал эти слова. Сейчас оно настигло Аластора. Пронзило смутное, тревожное озарение. Что-то было не так. Что-то до боли знакомое. Он пытался ухватить ускользающую мысль, но она, точно мотылек, порхала где-то на периферии сознания. Лина Кайлас «Контрактор. Коллизии желаний» #контрактор #цитаты

❤‍🔥1👍1🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC51 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

❤️❤️❤️ Ой, не скажу, что это прям детектив-детектив 🕵️‍♂️ Такое скорее зайдет тем, что интересуется жизнью и "внутрянкой" монаршей семьи. Как живут, что делают, как стоится их быт и работа. Этому реально посвящено много времени и много страниц. Основные персонажи тут скорее выполняют роль информационных посредников. Как уличные мальчишки для Шерлока Холмса. Они доставют информацию, разведывают, собирают данные и тащ

🔥4👍1😁1

5 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTC52 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @litmir_1

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🎞️Контрактор. Коллизии Желаний – А ты обучаем, Сэмюэль Константин, – на губах его заиграла заговорщическая полуулыбка. – Предлагаю тебе маленькую сделку, посредничек. Считай, передаю привет контрактору Барона Самеди, – имя лоа Ти-Жан-Петро выплюнул, словно шелуху от семечек. – Который струсил приходить ко мне сам, – в голосе скользнуло негодование. – Я сохраню тебе жизнь. Даже отвечу на вопросы. Но взамен, –

👍3🥰2👏1

5 Aug 2026, 09:50 UTC55 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Решила отмести оба варианта 🤣 Да, примерно так я выбираю что почитать 😂 Потому - вот. «Задачка на три корги», С. Дж. Беннет. И вот я как бы начала… А потом узнала, что это вторая книга в цикле 🫣🤣 Ну, не думаю, что в такого рода детективах это имеет хоть какой-то смысл 🤷 ❤️ Аннотация к книге Это вторая книга из серии детективных романов, в которых Елизавета II в перерывах между исполнением королевских обяз

👍4🔥3🕊1

4 Aug 2026, 16:47 UTC61 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

А нет... Вот тебе и хоррор. Боди-хоррор. Фу... Причем прям мерзотненький такой боди-хоррор 🤢 Вот я предпочитаю более интеллектуальные ужасы что ли. Триллеры там. Или неведомую хтонину. А вот варианты с боди-хоррором... бэ. У меня весьма живое воображение: я начинаю представлять все это в голове. Образно. Ярко. Короче, мерзко, епрст... 🤢 Столько всего в итоге намешано. И Атлантида, и монеты, которые передают проклят

🙈4🤯2👀1

4 Aug 2026, 09:39 UTC63 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вот кстати, у меня есть все шансы дочитать это сегодня. Ощущения пока весьма неоднозначные. Почему-то не воспринимаю это как ужасы. Скорее как выживалити 🤷‍♂️ Так вот, думаю что взять дальше. Вариантов несколько: 1. Продолжить "стрелять" в список из флешмоба. Ну, "Аут" я читаю медленно, ибо он у меня есть только на компе... А за компом в последнее время я только пишу. Но мы его добьем. Сама по себе история мне нрави

3👍2🔥1😈1

3 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC69 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ну вот, а мой околомуж не захотел назвать сына Аякс 😂 Вот прям категорически против был. А мы бы тренд возглавили, ага 😜 Но я выкрутилась - назвала так главного героя "Зеркал" 😌 #lafi_пишет #lafi_зеркала #lafi_страницажизни

🤣5🔥3😁3

3 Aug 2026, 10:55 UTC73 views16 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

🫐🫐🫐🫐🫐 🔵🔵🔵🔵🔵🔵 Нашла у себя довольно тематическую фотографию 😀 Потому что хочу подвести какой-никакой, но срез по состоянию "проделанной работы" на начало месяца 🖤 🔢Сейчас «Зеркала» - это 🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩знаков. Или 1️⃣0️⃣,5️⃣ авторских листов. Чтоб ничего не забыть и все-таки уложиться в адекватный объем... написала себе жесткий поглавник 😜 Иначе тут две крайности: или перебдеть опять на 19 алок, или забыт

6🔥6👍2🥰2

2 Aug 2026, 12:35 UTC78 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @stydy_eliPhoto

– Это не игра, это твоя жизнь! – он встряхнул Сэма, словно пытался избавить его ото всех так раздражавших библейских цитат в голове: чтобы они рассыпались по полу следом за осколками и больше никогда не вылетали изо рта священника. Лина Кайлас «Контрактор. Коллизии желаний» #контрактор #цитаты

🔥54👍1

1 Aug 2026, 14:14 UTC78 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @tomenchukavPhoto

🔥 "Нулевой пациент" - это мистический триллер с сильной любовной и детективной линией. 🔥 Это первая часть дилогии. 🔥 Сеттинг - европейский. Локация - вымышленный город-государство Треверберг (Между Дрезденом и Прагой) 🔥 Можно читать отдельно от всей серии. 🔥 В книге 4 сюжетных черно-белых иллюстрации, созданных Женей Александровой. Впервые в этой серии мы вставили иллюстрации в блок. 🔥 Оформление глав и интерлюд

👍5🔥21😈1

1 Aug 2026, 09:54 UTC76 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃 🍃 🍃Сегодня отмечают Ламмас – летний праздник первого урожая. 🍃Считается, что именно в это время начинают сохнуть растения, а плоды и семена созревают и осыпаются, чтобы на их месте уже через год взошли новые. Представители разных культур называют этот день по-своему: Ламмас, Лугнасад, Лунаса, Праздник Кукурузы, Праздник Первого Урожая, Праздник Хлеба. Си­ла мо­лодо­го бо­га вы­ходит на ис­пы­тание внеш­ним м

🕊5👍21💘1

31 Jul 2026, 15:50 UTC73 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈 «🎞 🎞🎞🎞🎞🎞🎞🎞 🎞🎞 🎞🎞🎞🎞🎞🎞🎞» ✍🏻 Крэйг Эштон 📄 320 стр. 🚫 16+ 📑 АСТ …если сможете влюбиться и в культуру тоже, то будете чувствовать себя в ней, как лягушка под легким дождем. © Крэйг Эштон «У русских за пазухой» 🔵Я «проглотила» эту книгу с таким неописуемым удовольствием, что даже не знаю с чего начать! Единственное, что слегонца подпортило малину – последние главы, где идет разбор некоторых песен с

🔥4👍1🕊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @redbookwriter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 196,896 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Разные стороны Рыжей | Лина Кайлас | 18+” (@redbookwriter), 3,099 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/redbookwriter.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.