Channel
@redbluehearts
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003118512931 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @redbluehearts |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/redbluehearts |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 4 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 5 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:50 | 5 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
37 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 18 | 48.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 12 | 32.4% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 8.11% | |
| custom 5467909885146462669 | 2 | 5.41% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 5.41% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 March 2026 to 4 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Тренер, который до самого конца и даже после продолжает говорить с уважением и с душой. Ну видно по нему, что он всю душу вложил в свою работу здесь. Да, не всё получалось, но как же он не заслужил той грязи, которой его так усердно поливают наши старательные комментаторы в соцсетях... Смотрю на его прощание с Кругом и думаю, что у них была хорошая связь. Круг всегда с одобрением и уважением отзывался о Фабио. Смотрю…
💯3
А вообще горжусь командой! Да, не всё получается, да, много ошибаемся, но зато в нашей команде нет клоунов и симулянтов! Очень сложно честно выигрывать в нечестной игре, но мы верим, что возможно ❤️💙
❤1
Круговой – о ситуации в ЦСКА: всем надо включаться на 200% и утешить самолюбие Игрок ЦСКА Данил Круговой ответил на вопрос о происходящем в команде после ничьей с «Ростовом» в 26-м туре РПЛ (1:1). — Что происходит с ЦСКА весной? Почему команда вновь не может выиграть? — Каждому игроку надо включаться не на 100%, а на 200% и утешить самолюбие своё. — Вы отстаёте от «Локомотива» на четыре очка, у них ещё игра в запа…
❤1
Интересно, что наши (недо)болельщики даже игроков не слышат уже, так сосредоточились на своей ненависти. И очевидно ни в кого уже не верят (а верили ли?). А мы, как всегда, верим в команду (и в тренера, как Круг) ❤️💙
❤1
Да!!❤️💙
❤1
⚡️ Данил Круговой: «Нужно всем собраться и верить в идеи Фабио, как верили. Надеюсь, переломный момент очень скоро настанет» 🗝 @cska_redblue
❤1
🔴🔵 ЦСКА СТАНОВИТСЯ ПЕРВЫМ В ИСТОРИИ ОБЛАДАТЕЛЕМ WINLINE BASKET CUP
❤🔥2
Красно-синия семья, есть и хорошие новости!! 🎉 Поздравляем нашу баскетбольную команду ❤️💙
🎉2
Эти эмоции из раздевалки важно показать. Равнодушных там нет 🙏🏻
❤2
Я так скажу: в поражениях команды не может быть виноват только лишь тренер. Болельщики, которые при любой ошибке начинают хейтить всех - от тренера и игроков до администрации клуба, тоже не помогают как минимум. Тем более никто из них не может знать всего, что происходит за закрытыми дверьми внутри клуба. Только слухи и домыслы, на основании которых многие делают выводы и льют просто тонны хейта. Да, очень неприятная…
❤2
Вагнер написал чудесную историю в ЦСКА ❤️💙
❤1
Эти кадры в сердце каждого армейца ❤️💙 Вспоминаем славные годы Вагнера в ЦСКА. Яркий, неповторимый, сильный, он влюблял в себя болельщиков по всему миру 🙌🏻 Спасибо, легенда! 🙏🏻
❤2❤🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @redbluehearts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Красно-синие сердца, мы поддержка ЦСКА ❤️💙” (@redbluehearts), 4 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/redbluehearts.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.