Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Português com Prof. Juciano

Channel

Português com Prof. Juciano

@redacaoplay

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

22,807subscribers

-111 since we began measuring on 4 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001060677804
TypeChannel
Username@redacaoplay
Created24 July 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded4 September 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/redacaoplay

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

22,80722,91822,862.54 September 2026 — 22,918 subscribers4 September 2026 — 22,918 subscribers5 September 2026 — 22,903 subscribers9 September 2026 — 22,872 subscribers11 September 2026 — 22,857 subscribers13 September 2026 — 22,846 subscribers15 September 2026 — 22,835 subscribers17 September 2026 — 22,827 subscribers19 September 2026 — 22,807 subscribers4 September 202619 September 2026
9 measurements spanning 15 days, net -111. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,790–22,935 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 12:1722,807-20
17 Sept 2026, 02:5622,827-8
15 Sept 2026, 04:1822,835-11
13 Sept 2026, 13:1922,846-11
11 Sept 2026, 19:3722,857-15
9 Sept 2026, 06:1922,872-31
5 Sept 2026, 23:3622,903-15
4 Sept 2026, 03:2222,918no change
4 Sept 2026, 02:4722,918first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 3 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.88%
avg views ÷ 22,807 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,340
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held16 (3 July 202622 August 2026)
Views total1,340
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Sept 2026, 03:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 15 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @redacaoplay. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 July 2026 to 22 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

22 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC≈1,340 views0 reactions1 Starread 4 September 2026

A blusa que fui. ❌️ A blusa com que fui. ✅️ A hora que cheguei. ❌️ A hora a que cheguei. ✅️ A pizza que gosto. ❌️ A pizza de que gosto. ✅️ O vídeo que assisti. ❌️ O vídeo a que assisti. ✅️

5 Aug 2026, 10:11 UTC≈2,340 viewsread 4 September 2026

Pessoal, divulguem o canal nos grupos que vocês estejam por aqui no Telegram. Tentarei postar dicas diariamente para concursos. Um beijão!

7 Jul 2026, 18:00 UTC≈4,100 viewsread 4 September 2026

https://youtu.be/YrIgosAmEP8?is=IU7p8qEzOwKY0kpD MODELO DE DESENVOLVIMENTO PARA ENEM E CONCURSOS

7 Jul 2026, 18:00 UTC≈2,830 viewsread 4 September 2026

https://youtu.be/Rzr1h65nE-o?is=Ns1wSz6J4ntIRxQ9 PARA ENEM E CONCURSOS

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @redacaoplay. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Jul 2026, 12:00 UTCAnonymous Quiz304 voters

📚 Questão de Gramática — uso de 'mal' vs 'mau' · Estilo FGV Assinale a alternativa em que o emprego do termo 'mal' ou 'mau' está gramaticalmente correto, considerando a norma-padrão da língua portuguesa.

  1. A) O mal profissional não se preocupa com a ética.14%
  2. B) O time jogou mau na partida decisiva.8%
  3. C) Ele estava de mau humor desde a manhã.59%
  4. D) Desde que chegou, ele se sente mau.6%
  5. E) Aquele foi um mal momento para a decisão.12%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Jul 2026, 12:00 UTCAnonymous Quiz243 voters

📚 Questão de Gramática — regência verbal · Estilo FGV Assinale a alternativa em que a regência verbal está em conformidade com a norma-padrão da língua portuguesa.

  1. A) A medida implicou em sérias dificuldades para a equipe.21%
  2. B) O diretor visava a um aumento significativo da produtividade.26%
  3. C) Os alunos assistiram o espetáculo com grande entusiasmo.23%
  4. D) É preciso obedecer o regimento interno da instituição.14%
  5. E) Preferimos mais o silêncio do campo do que o barulho da cidade.16%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 22 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

O INFORMANTE
@oinformanteof · 161,716
#1
Deposito de Mágoas
@depositodemagoas · 1,841
#2
Info Line
@InfoLine · 3,479
#3
🇹op🇿oei🇷A
@topzoeiraOFC · 18,425
#4
Brasil e o gás a 100 real
@brasileogasa100real · 16,957
#5
🚿 Pensamentos no Chuveiro
@pensamentosnochuveiro · 1,153
#6
🇺🇸 Inglês pelo Telegram
@inglespelotelegram · 112,649
#7
The Intercept BR
@TheInterceptBr · 11,641
#8
Cura Quântica 🎆
@CuraQuantica · 1,348
#9
BBC News Brasil
@bbcbrasil · 34,292
#10
Meio Bit
@MeioBit · 1,749
#11
⚡️ Português Concursos 📚 🇧🇷
@TreinePortuguesTodososDias · 9,533
#12
TECH-TI
@TechTI · 2,459
#13
Dicas Telegram
@DicasTelegram · 17,417
#14
Arquitetura arrombada
@arquiteturaarrombada · 5,310
#15
Buteco Gamer
@butecogamer · 2,084
#16
🇧🇷 Aprendendo Inglês 🇬🇧
@AprendendoIngles · 33,653
#17
Gritaria
@gritaria · 3,739
#18
Carro manco
@carromanco · 994
#19
Mathematics Channel
@mathschan · 4,507
#20
Atrocidades Alimentícias 💀🍽💀
@atroalimentos · 1,763
#21
Tech Conectados
@techconectados · 5,224
#22
A Prassa é Noça ⛲️
@aprassa · 1,086
#23
Tecnoblog
@Tecnoblog · 14,862
#24
Pohjeto || raimundo 臭いオタク
@dearRaimundo · 1,119
#25
Bichinhos
@bichinho · 2,507
#26
Memes Esquerdistas ☭
@memesesquerdistas · 2,260
#27
Gatinhos
@gatosestranhos · 3,917
#28
Trilhas Sonoras
@TrilhasSonoras · 3,572
#29
Gaming Room
@GamingRoomOficial · 889
#30
[CANAL] Info Comedy Total
@infocomedy · 2,885
#31
Ação Policial
@policiabr · 4,651
#32
Legado Bolsonarista
@PauNoCuDoBolsonaro · 1,365
#33
Jogos baratos ou gratuitos, promoções e bundles
@jogosbaratos · 13,641
#34
🅼ú🆂🅸🅲🅰🆂 🅿🅰🆁🅰 🅼🅰🅻🅷🅰🆁
@malharnaacademia · 666 (as read 19 September 2026)
#35
TV Serie News
@tvserienews · 7,437
#36
Entendendo o Telegram
@EntendendoTelegram · 5,303
#37

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

🇧🇷 Aprendendo Inglês 🇬🇧
@AprendendoIngles · 33,653
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Português com Prof. Juciano” (@redacaoplay), 22,807 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/redacaoplay.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.