Had some time off which was much needed. I've been building, looking forward to sharing everything soon

Channel
Page Analysis
@red_tribe
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Cite this entry
29subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001275285764 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @red_tribe |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 9 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/red_tribe |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Sept 2026, 05:01 | 29 | -1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 16:21 | 30 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:46 | 31 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:30 | 31 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 6 March 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 May 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
For good this time aha
I'm back...
https://twitter.com/page_analyst/status/1663966697521311746?t=TuTuq-KClQDGPCgV-bnsmA&s=19
https://twitter.com/Kenari_ltd/status/1615303018139770880?t=jLHN8qEfNme8cPs_CiaXgQ&s=19
https://twitter.com/page_analyst/status/1562395027220963328
ADHD coming to the forefront of my twitter
https://twitter.com/page_analyst/status/1529808742186893312
IOTA TA :)
https://twitter.com/page_analyst/status/1527294590163689482
https://twitter.com/page_analyst/status/1526547942194221058
Thoughts on LUNA situation
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @red_tribe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Page Analysis” (@red_tribe), 29 subscribers as measured 30 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/red_tribe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.