Channel
@red_3_6_9
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,702subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001510701731 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @red_3_6_9 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/red_3_6_9 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:27 | 1,702 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 1,704 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 1,710 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:49 | 1,710 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 13 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
75 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 46 | 61.3% | |
| 🙏 | 9 | 12.0% | |
| 🥰 | 9 | 12.0% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 9.33% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 5.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 13 October 2025 to 15 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ostschweizer Schnüffler pinned «Geschätzte Community Macht euch bitte mal ernsthafte Gedanken, wie ihr eure Zukunft seht, was ihr machen möchtet, ob ihr weiterhin viel Zeit mit Infos sammeln im Internet verbringen wollt oder ob ihr selbst die Reissleine zieht, euch vom Netz löst und euch…»
Hier noch einige schöne Videos für euch, alles Liebe ❤️
❤14
Signed Sandy
Guten Morgen Ihrs 😊 Ostschweizer Schnüffler https://t.me/red_3_6_9
❤8
Signed Sandy
Anmerkungen meinerseits zu Aussagen im Video Und hier erneut zum Thema Atombombe, die nicht existiert. 'Schmutzige Bomben' gibt es, die werden einfach mit radioaktivem Material versehen, aber A Bomben sind inexistent! Links zu einer Doku, eine PDF Datei plus noch eine Aussage. Desweiteren zur Erwähnung der 'DNA' Veränderung: halte ich ebenfalls für eine PSYOP wie die Virenlüge, Genetik und Atombombenlüge. Das alles …
👍2❤1
Signed Sandy
Zusendung 😁
Signed Sandy
(Sata)Nasa und Antarctica Teile 3a und 3b Ostschweizer Schnüffler https://t.me/red_3_6_9
Signed Sandy
(Sata)Nasa und Antarctica Teil 2a und 2b Ostschweizer Schnüffler https://t.me/red_3_6_9
Signed Sandy
Denn es ist tatsächlich so, dass sich die meisten Infos im Kreis drehen, kennen wir bereits, nur Protagonisten und Schauplätze sind 'neu', das wechselt, doch der Inhalt ist im Grunde derselbe. Ich bin bereits damit beschäftigt mich selbst zu verwirklichen,, sage dem System Adieu und Tschüss. Denn gerade aktuell zeigt mir das 'System', zu was es fähig ist, zeigt mir seine Fratze, zeigt, zu was es uns gemacht hat und …
🙏9🥰8👍2❤1👏1
Signed Sandy
Geschätzte Community Macht euch bitte mal ernsthafte Gedanken, wie ihr eure Zukunft seht, was ihr machen möchtet, ob ihr weiterhin viel Zeit mit Infos sammeln im Internet verbringen wollt oder ob ihr selbst die Reissleine zieht, euch vom Netz löst und euch selbst verwirklicht. Denn was bringt es, sich über Chatkontrollen und Zensuren aufzuregen? Wer NICHT mehr oder nur noch ganz wenig ins Netz geht, um für sich sel…
❤7👏6
Signed Sandy
Krankheit ist kein Angriff, sondern eine Reinigung des Körpers Dr. Stefan Lanka ist ein Biologe, der sich seit Jahrzehnten der klassischen Virologie widersetzt. Er tut dies nicht nur als Wissenschaftler, sondern auch als Denker, der die menschliche Gesundheit aus einer völlig anderen Perspektive betrachtet. Viren als Illusion der Angst Alte Kulturen kannten Dämonen und böse Geister. Die moderne Zivilisation kennt Vi…
❤6
Signed Sandy
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Sandy
Guten Morgen Ihrs 😊 Ostschweizer Schnüffler https://t.me/red_3_6_9
❤9🥰1
Signed Sandy
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @red_3_6_9. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 923,805 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@red_3_6_9 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ostschweizer Schnüffler” (@red_3_6_9), 1,702 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/red_3_6_9.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.