Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

джемини

@realonegemini

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8,400subscribers

-33 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001724912426
TypeChannel
Username@realonegemini
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/realonegemini

Growth

8,4008,4338,416.56 August 2026 — 8,433 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,429 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,407 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,400 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,395–8,438 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 05:458,400-7
9 Aug 2026, 23:378,407-22
6 Aug 2026, 13:518,429-4
6 Aug 2026, 04:498,433first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.5%
avg views ÷ 8,400 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,900
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.31%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held20 (13 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total55,030
Reactions total1,272
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 21s
Average length
40s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,211 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
67055.3%
🔥33327.5%
😁1038.51%
🤓635.20%
🏆393.22%
👍30.248%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,472reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @realonegemini. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 18:25 UTC≈1,340 views49 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

а как ваще понять этот момент, что ты уже можешь писать артисту? 🤓 раньше мне было пофиг, если честно, и я тупо писал ребятам в дм. по прошлому посту это можно увидеть) но щас, после 8 лет в индустрии, я понимаю, что момент наступает не тогда, когда ты просто более менее сводишь и можешь скинуть артисту микс «на зацен» он наступает, когда у тебя появляется наслушанность, способность предложить свой вижн и понимани

🔥339😁7

10 Aug 2026, 16:04 UTC≈1,750 views80 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Video

решил почекать свои первые переписки с артистами.. нашел кринж года 👀 это мой 2019) тогда я ещё писал биты и ток делал первые попытки получить коннекты и вот однажды написал Лёхе SEEMEE. это пример, как делать не надо)) само сообщение норм. стрем в 4 утра звонить артисту после того, как он мне не ответил, и кидать такое гс я писал так, как чувствовал в тот момент. но, спустя годы, понимаю, что выглядел такой мув

😁4920🏆9🔥2

9 Aug 2026, 05:01 UTC≈2,070 views33 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

салют, ребята! на дату в телефоне глянул, чуть офигел, лето уже прошло почти.. пока ещё кайфую, хочется за границу слетать успеть, но скоро уже нужно будет плотно херачить. целей хватает, хочу одной из них с вами поделиться)) я уже окреп как звукоинженер на нашем рынке и ближайший год буду двигать в сторону западного. там дофига своих тонкостей, но и жирных плюсов тоже хватает очень хочу собрать полноценный микс б

33

6 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTC≈2,360 views60 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ну и продолжаем нашу рубрику с разбором популярных релизов) сегодня разберем альбом Playboi Carti - Whole Lotta Red этот альбик вообще хорошо показывает одну важную вещь - грязный микс ≠ плохой микс)) - вокал первое, что сразу бросается в уши - голос. тут оч сильно выпирает середина и верхняя середина, где-то в районе 5-7 кгц и еще момент - с-ки тут не задавлены диэссером так сильно, как многие привыкли их подавл

50🔥8👍2

6 Aug 2026, 11:40 UTC≈2,240 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026

гики, давайте активнее, вы чего? когда еще будет такая возможность разобрать, почему вам не отвечают артисты жду ещё от вас скрины под этим постом выше, закидывайте в комменты, не стесняйтесь)

29

5 Aug 2026, 11:50 UTC≈2,750 views119 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

первый успех тебя не прокормит. это только верхушка айсберга 👀 по себе знаю) я сам начинал с Антохой SEEYASIDE, мб шарит кто. мы воркали за идею подняться вместе, скиллов набирались. с его треков еще до того, как он стрельнул, ко мне начали приходить клиенты, человек 5-7 было какое-то время записывал их на хате у себя и даже копеечку имел, но на жизнь не хватало, поэтому параллельно сведосу я работал в магазе одеж

82🔥21😁16

2 Aug 2026, 14:30 UTC≈3,230 views61 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ну щас чек уже чууууть побольше у меня 😁 от 30к)) а если проект большой, ну два-три артиста там, несколько битов в треке, куча правок всяких, то чек ваще спокойно доходит и до 50к+ причем заказов меньше не становится и все дело тут в моем подходе, в отдаче на 1000%, говорил уже об этом) сведос для меня это не чисто ручки в плагинах покрутить. это совместное творчество, такой прям оч интимный процесс, на самом де

42🔥10😁9

31 Jul 2026, 11:31 UTC≈3,370 views113 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ну че, расскажу свой опыт с чеком сведоса 3.5к? 😵 чел в комментах тут поделился, что не вывозит объем заказов у меня было то же самое. когда ток стрельнул как звукарь, то много проектов прилетело. все взял. думал «да вывезу» спойлер: не вывез 😁 ток нервы убил себе и сроки артистам затянул - слишком большой объем был понял тогда, что все, тумач. надо делать что-то и все оказалось капец просто - я повысил чек) р

92🏆11🤓10

30 Jul 2026, 12:11 UTC≈3,300 views65 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

как не отъехать башкой от постоянного сведоса гики, вижу, что в комментах фоток и видосов накидали вы, от души) много со студийки контента от вас воркать важно сто проц, я тоже плотно работаю летом даже но качественно отдыхать тоже надо, это прям мое правило я от работы, от суеты там всякой когда как разгружаюсь, вот вообще по-разному прям отдельный кайф - баня или сауна, особенно зимой-осенью. люблю иногда в те

48🔥9😁8

29 Jul 2026, 16:41 UTC≈2,950 views53 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

я не фанат тусовок, но со своими артистами мне в кайф двигаться 🔥 музыка уже давно стала частью всей моей жизни)) когда вне студии встречаемся с ребятами, пообщаться, почиллить без всяких там рабочих моментов, то все равно начинаем обсуждать миксик, сведосик потому что как ни крути связаны ворком, живем им. и я люто кайфую от этих моментов, мне ваще не надоедает говорить о музле) каждый день благодарен за то, как

37🔥8😁5🏆3

28 Jul 2026, 12:10 UTC≈3,180 views57 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

кстати, каждый месяц я получаю по 20-30 новых заказов на сведос 🔥 и большая часть из них - с контента!!! но при этом мало кто об этой теме всерьез задумывается какое бы обучение я не посмотрел, везде говорят только про скиллы. базара нет, это основа. но я знаю, что оч много крутых звукарей, кто реально неплохо сводит, сидят сейчас без заказов, потому что люди ваще не знают, что ты существуешь.. отзовитесь внизу, у

🔥3014🏆10🤓3

27 Jul 2026, 18:28 UTC≈3,040 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026

всем привет! мб уже видел кто, я тут начал заливать рилсы, как юзаю ONERACK, в инст 👀 кто не знал, гляньте, ну и сабнитесь, чтоб инфу не пропускать: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DbJGUWBihxC/?igsh=MXA0NW8zZHhrOG1pMA буду фишки разные показывать по сведосу, звучок разбирать со всяких треков и иногда палить моментики закулисные))

14🏆1🔥1🤓1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @realonegemini. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 131,846 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“джемини” (@realonegemini), 8,400 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/realonegemini.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.