Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝒋𝒖𝒑𝒊𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒔𝒌𝒊𝒚'

Channel

𝒋𝒖𝒑𝒊𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒔𝒌𝒊𝒚'

@realjupiterskiy

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,164subscribers

-457 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002659280424
TypeChannel
Username@realjupiterskiy
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/realjupiterskiy

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5,1645,6215,392.57 August 2026 — 5,621 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,611 subscribers11 August 2026 — 5,568 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,537 subscribers18 August 2026 — 5,496 subscribers21 August 2026 — 5,464 subscribers25 August 2026 — 5,402 subscribers27 August 2026 — 5,365 subscribers31 August 2026 — 5,334 subscribers3 September 2026 — 5,302 subscribers8 September 2026 — 5,249 subscribers12 September 2026 — 5,207 subscribers16 September 2026 — 5,164 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 40 days, net -457. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,095–5,690 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 17:205,164-43
12 Sept 2026, 18:595,207-42
8 Sept 2026, 18:575,249-53
3 Sept 2026, 09:535,302-32
31 Aug 2026, 00:265,334-31
27 Aug 2026, 23:475,365-37
25 Aug 2026, 01:285,402-62
21 Aug 2026, 11:065,464-32
18 Aug 2026, 06:225,496-41
14 Aug 2026, 23:065,537-31
11 Aug 2026, 20:155,568-43
8 Aug 2026, 09:465,611-10
7 Aug 2026, 16:175,621first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

677 reactions across 18 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
32147.4%
🥰9714.3%
😱487.09%
🔥314.58%
💋304.43%
👍263.84%
🍓172.51%
😁172.51%
🤷‍♂142.07%
👏131.92%
🆒121.77%
😢121.77%
🍾101.48%
💘101.48%
👀60.886%
🤔40.591%
💊30.443%
❤‍🔥20.295%
💔20.295%
🕊10.148%
1 further kind10.148%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 677 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 March 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
45
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 20 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
40
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @realjupiterskiy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 March 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 16:07 UTC129 viewsread 12 August 2026

Первому 💎

Signed Best Random Bot 🎁 [Конкурсный бот для розыгрышей | Рандомайзер]

9 Aug 2026, 12:59 UTC93 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @dormmadridPhoto

😭А ведь Эден Азар буквально лучший 50-й номер в истории «Реала» И вы говорите, что его трансфер провален?💀 🤩 Мадридская Общага | Real Madrid CF

😁2

Signed Вирилл Китчер

8 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC91 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @dormmadridPhoto

📸 🤩 Мадридская Общага | Real Madrid CF

2🔥1

Signed Вирилл Китчер

1 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC161 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @dormmadridPhoto

Сходства: • евреи • любят деньги • не выигрывали Лигу Чемпионов Отличия: • нет отличий

👍2🕊1😁1

Signed Вирилл Китчер

1 Aug 2026, 12:12 UTC162 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @dormmadridPhoto

Пов: как будет выглядеть Асенсио, когда возьмёт 4 номер😑

5👍2🥰2😁2

Signed Вирилл Китчер

20 Jul 2026, 16:56 UTC317 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @dormmadridPhoto

❗️ИТАК, ПОДВЕДЁМ ИТОГИ❗️ За последние два года мы увидели: - Евро 2024 - Чм 2026 - Главное ограбление за последние года 3 (ЗМ 2024) - Требл Псж - Смерть Диего Жоты Ну так и не увидели трофей Реала🤷‍♂️😁

7👏2😁2

Signed Вирилл Китчер

19 Jul 2026, 19:14 UTC257 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @dormmadridPhoto

Бля, как же он хорош

😁1

Signed Вирилл Китчер

19 Jul 2026, 19:00 UTC243 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @dormmadridPhoto

❤️⚔️🩵ПОЕХАЛИ!

1

Signed Вирилл Китчер

19 Jul 2026, 17:49 UTC188 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @dormmadridPhoto

🤑Конкурс! среди подписчиков на сегодняшний матч «финала ЧМ» Кто первый угадает исход матча и автора хотя бы одного гола сегодняшней игры 🇦🇷 🆚 🇪🇸 — получит 1000₽ на карту. 🚨Приглашайте своих друзей поучаствовать, писать не более одного прогноза, комментарии не редактировать Ждем ваши варианты 👇

🤔1😁1

Signed Вирилл Китчер

19 Jul 2026, 17:09 UTC169 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @dormmadridPhoto

🇦🇷🏆| Состав «Аргентины» на матч против «Испании»

💔1🔥1

Signed Вирилл Китчер

19 Jul 2026, 17:05 UTC159 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @dormmadridPhoto

🇪🇸🏆| Состав «Испании» на матч против «Аргентины»

1

Signed Вирилл Китчер

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @realjupiterskiy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝒋𝒖𝒑𝒊𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒔𝒌𝒊𝒚'” (@realjupiterskiy), 5,164 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/realjupiterskiy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.