Channel name was changed to «Infinite Coin Global | 无限币 ♾️»

Channel
Infinite Coin Global | 无限币 ♾️
@realchinapump
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
21,450subscribers
-866 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001920536610 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @realchinapump |
| Description | Official Infinite Coin ecosystem channel on Solana ♾️ Infinite Games • Transparent updates • Community raids • Futures education • Asia/Weibo expansion 无限币官方生态频道 | LEVEL ♾️ Owner - @wangOGbull |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/realchinapump |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 21,450 | -161 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:14 | 21,611 | -114 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:38 | 21,725 | -89 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:27 | 21,814 | -60 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:22 | 21,874 | -96 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 21,970 | -128 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:23 | 22,098 | -37 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:11 | 22,135 | -122 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:38 | 22,257 | -59 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:01 | 22,316 | first reading |
Engagement
26 posts held, back to 27 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 11.9%
- avg views ÷ 21,450 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,550
- 10 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 17.9%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 14
- of 26 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 26 (27 June 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 25,510 |
| Reactions total | 4,570 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Aug 2026, 15:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 942
- Videos
- 14
- Links
- 847
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
7,342 reactions across 22 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 11.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 844 | 11.5% | |
| 🥰 | 835 | 11.4% | |
| 👍 | 833 | 11.3% | |
| 🎉 | 818 | 11.1% | |
| 🔥 | 811 | 11.0% | |
| 😍 | 804 | 11.0% | |
| 💯 | 799 | 10.9% | |
| ❤ | 785 | 10.7% | |
| 🤩 | 770 | 10.5% | |
| 👏 | 17 | 0.232% | |
| 🐳 | 12 | 0.163% | |
| 🤯 | 6 | 0.082% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 0.041% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 0.027% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 0.027% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.014% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,342reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Channel photo updated
💰💰Earn +$98.49(+178.87%), Whale 鲸鱼 .,. -- at Pumpers, holding $49.16, Discover faster, trade faster with GMGN! #Pumpers #GMGN https://gmgn.ai/sol/address/Hanzx0Ol_G5KeBuoDtmBrRQt9fMy29FCUSXDWMwHe7W4skfwDtURv
🎉64💯64👍59❤🔥58🤩58🔥54😍50❤49
Channel name was changed to «InfiniteCoinHQ 无限金币♾️»
$PONS 🔥 的成交量不太稳定。 Chart: https://gmgn.ai/robinhood/token/Hanzx0Ol_0x39dBED3a2bd333467115dE45665cC57F813C4571 我目前还是在密切关注 Robinhood,因为它的成交量也很不错。 提醒一下,我们之前在 ATH(历史最高点)时最高拿到了 19 倍利润,目前仍然是 11.8 倍。
⚡2❤2👍2🔥2🥰2🫡2💯1
Channel name was changed to «InfiniteCoinHQ»
建仓 $CATE 🔥 持有 CATE,可获得 Doge 奖励。 不只是 Sol 链上的纯 Meme 币,而是真正具备实用价值(Utility)的项目。 DEX 还没有拉盘推广(未付费做市/未买量),注意把握进场时机。 CA: 0x1d5398ff0acc36d8baadf65a776f609c53627777 Chart: https://gmgn.ai/bsc/token/Hanzx0Ol_0x1d5398ff0acc36d8baadf65a776f609c53627777
🔥31😍30🥰28❤🔥27❤25🎉25👍25🤩23
$shitter 76k - 20.5x off bottom Chart: https://gmgn.ai/sol/token/Hanzx0Ol_6tir8QLyonfe6CFPNF6WxxMHynrbVVVJCh6sjWfkpump
🥰42❤35👍31❤🔥30💯30🔥30😍30🎉23
$bruhby 🔥 | ATH: 245k - 14.5x AI Bot 在 1.69 万美元市值时就抓到了,没错,就是这么早。 我们还在持续冲。 这个项目现在也开始在 Reddit 上火起来了。 下一个热点会是什么??? CA: 4GJMoGC6SgShaGap1u7buXdPNeMS8YM5mNaus6fCpump Chart: https://gmgn.ai/sol/token/Hanzx0Ol_4GJMoGC6SgShaGap1u7buXdPNeMS8YM5mNaus6fCpump PNL: https://t.me/pumpfunnevadie/126911
🥰36💯35😍31❤🔥30🎉30👍30🤩28❤21
$loong | 2.32m - 115.4x 在 50 万市值 的底部就提醒大家上车了。 随后一路暴涨,成功刷新历史新高(ATH)! PNL: https://t.me/pumpfunnevadie/126187 https://gmgn.ai/sol/token/Hanzx0Ol_AkchGAUdXXRGHt3HXaHbTvw3JLGUwtJRmYnkG66wpump
👍80❤76🔥72❤🔥70💯68🎉64😍59🤩57
建仓 $BRODIE 观察了几个小时,决定直接进。 它是 Robinhood 官方的狗狗,名字叫 Brodie。 我已经把仓位打满了,大家自己把握好进场时机。 CA: 0x45F82AC5d507e988f7406935da8eEfe495a360e0 Chart: https://gmgn.ai/robinhood/token/Hanzx0Ol_0x45F82AC5d507e988f7406935da8eEfe495a360e0
😍72👍71❤🔥67🎉67🥰66🔥63💯62🤩59
$BROKE 是 种仅供娱乐的虚拟货币。它没有任何内在价值、实用性,也不预期会带来任何经济回报。本网站上的任何内容均不构成财务建议。房子是虚构的。可悲的是,那只鸟却是真实存在的。请只投入您输得起的钱。🐾🪙 CA: 0x41f651A0Ef725E6a1dB8dDf8ee2701DA33610b0c ✈️: https://t.me/BrokeBirdPortal 💬: https://x.com/brokebirdcoin 🌐: https://brokebird.xyz/
😍79🥰78👍74❤71🎉71🔥70❤🔥64💯60
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @realchinapump. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 268,178 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Infinite Coin Global | 无限币 ♾️” (@realchinapump), 21,450 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/realchinapump.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.