Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Клавдия про книги печатает:

Channel

Клавдия про книги печатает:

@reading_klavdiyav

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,110subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 18 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002080639181
TypeChannel
Username@reading_klavdiyav
DescriptionЧитаю, делюсь
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded18 September 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/reading_klavdiyav

Growth

2,11018 Sept 2026, 10:47 — 2,110 subscribers18 Sept 2026, 11:22 — 2,110 subscribers18 Sept 2026, 10:4718 Sept 2026, 11:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,108–2,112 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 11:222,110no change
18 Sept 2026, 10:472,110first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 1 September 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.4%
avg views ÷ 2,110 subscribers
Avg views / post
409
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 September 2026
Posts held18 (1 September 202615 September 2026)
Views total6,545
Reactions total205
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Sept 2026, 11:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
182
Videos
21
Links
8

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

205 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15475.1%
🔥2612.7%
👍2110.2%
❤‍🔥20.976%
🙏20.976%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 205 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 September 2026 to 15 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Sept 2026, 08:22 UTC230 views15 reactionsread 18 September 2026

И вишенкой рассуждение Кельвина о Боге, которое напрямую связано с Солярисом. Он представляет себе не традиционного всемогущего и всеведущего Бога, а Бога несовершенного, могущественного, способного творить, способного ошибаться и, возможно, развивающегося вместе со своим творением. Для человека возможности Океана почти божественны! Он способен проникать в память, материализовать ее содержание, создавать практически

9👍6

15 Sept 2026, 08:08 UTC200 views9 reactionsread 18 September 2026

Что несет пьяный Снаут, душечка! Он, походу, измененным сознанием понял больше, чем всЁ, что накопали ученые до. В общем, пьяный Снаут говорит едва ли не самое трезвое во всем романе, наконец-то. Человечество веками мечтало встретить иной разум. Мы развивали философию, физику, строили ракеты, создавали соляристику и наконец мечта осуществилась. Но оказалось, что мы заранее сами придумали, каким должен быть этот кон

9

15 Sept 2026, 07:58 UTC227 views13 reactionsread 18 September 2026

Итак, поехали. Девочки, вот на этом эксперименте (с Крисом) я хочу остановиться отдельно. Потому что происходит очень странная вещь. Человечество десятилетиями пытается установить контакт с Солярисом, изучает мимоиды, симметриады, асимметриады, создает огромную науку, но не понимает океан. И тогда ученые посылают ему буквально человеческий мозг, а точнее, запись его электрической активности. Получается удивительная

13

15 Sept 2026, 07:49 UTC231 views5 reactionsread 18 September 2026

Пусть ваши цитаты будут тут 👇🏻

5

15 Sept 2026, 07:48 UTC241 views7 reactionsread 18 September 2026

Мои дорогие, привет! Сегодня мы заканчиваем с Солярисом и я хочу задать 3 вектора для обсуждения на основании 3 важных отрывков из книги. 1. Эксперимент над Крисом 2. Болтовня пьяного Снаута 3. Рассуждения Криса о Боге (вне религий, это важно). Сейчас будет несколько отдельных постов, пишите, где хотите! И еще! И еще. Отдельный пост для ваших, важных для вас цитат!

7

12 Sept 2026, 06:57 UTC387 views10 reactionsread 18 September 2026

Ну вот стоило мне обрадоваться, что так активно пошло обсуждение, как вы дружно меня проигнорили 😅 (кроме 2 человек, которым я очень благодарна, а-то будто ж сама с собой разговариваю). Но мы дочитываем книгу до конца, давайте, ко вторнику. Остается около 60 стр и я уверена, что все осилят, а многие уже и дочитали. Тогда мы сможем обсудить уже и героев, и философскую составляющую и дать свою интерпретацию того, что

8🙏2

11 Sept 2026, 16:27 UTC405 views11 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

9❤‍🔥2

11 Sept 2026, 16:18 UTC406 views9 reactionsread 18 September 2026

Мои дорогие, привет! Приступаем к обсуждению следующей части «Соляриса», напомню, на чем хочу сосредоточить ваше внимание и что нам важно обсудить. Саму планету, Солярис, сам океан. Это мы делаем на основе: 1. Запись показаний Бертона и комиссии. 2. Выдержки из монографии Гизе. Я сейчас снова наговорю важное голосом!

9

8 Sept 2026, 05:42 UTC599 views22 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

Что я читала в августе: 1. Канаэ Минато «Искупление» - нет 2. Абгарян «София возвращается домой» - для фанатов да, для первого знакомства нет. 3. Елецкая «Киштама» - да 4. Васкес-Фигероа Туарег 1 и Туарег 2 - да! 5. Р.Шарма «Манифест героя нашего времени» - нет 6. Сейнт-Джеймс «Сломанные девочки» 7. Януш Корчак «Лето в Михалувке», «Лето в Вильгельмувке» - да. 8. Гомер «Илиада» - все еще читаю. 9. Тимоти де Ф

👍146🔥2

5 Sept 2026, 09:47 UTC532 views18 reactionsread 18 September 2026

Доброе утро! Я в восторге от ваших комментариев! Их много! Они такие разные! Читаем дальше. Давайте до вторника осилим около 60 стр. С главы «Малый апокриф» по главу «Жидкий кислород» (не включая ее). На что тут попрошу обратить внимание и что нам важно обсудить. Саму планету, Солярис, сам океан. 1. Запись показаний Бертона и комиссии. 2. Выдержки из монографии Гизе.

11🔥7

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @reading_klavdiyav. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Открытая группа Татьяны Ельфимовой
@tetiana_elfimova · 31,941
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Клавдия про книги печатает:” (@reading_klavdiyav), 2,110 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/reading_klavdiyav.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.