Channel
@read_original
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,607subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001805471943 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @read_original |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/read_original |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 2,607 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:44 | 2,608 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 2,611 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:41 | 2,612 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:21 | 2,613 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:36 | 2,613 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 1 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (1 May 2026 – 28 July 2026) |
| Views total | 659 |
| Reactions total | 44 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
459 reactions across 17 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐳 | 332 | 72.3% | |
| 🕊 | 127 | 27.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 459reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 1 May 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Мы считали дни, и вот он наконец-то здесь! Лонг-лист Букеровской премии 2026. Уже разбираем книги и приступаем к чтению! The Shadow of the Object by Chloe Aridjis Switzy by Emma Cline Helen of Nowhere by Makenna Goodman The End of Everything by M. John Harrison The Disappearers by Marlon James Black Bag by Luke Kennard The Renovation by Kenan Orhan May We Feed the King by Rebecca Perry The Palm House by Gwendoline R…
🐳37🕊7
Photo, posted without a caption
🐳11
The Benefactors by Wendy Erskine (2025) #WomensPrize_2026 Писательница сразу начинает играть грязно. Мисти, девушку-подростка изнасиловали трое знакомых, таких же подростков. Ужасно? Ещё как! А если я, словно говорит нам Венди Эрскин, добавлю, что жертва продавала им наркотики и работает вебкам-моделью? А один из преступников потерял мать, а другой – отца? А мать третьего работает с трудными детьми? А если вы узнае…
🐳17
Photo, posted without a caption
🕊14🐳7
Sisters in Yellow by Mieko Kawakami (2023, перевод на английский в 2026) На дворе первый ковидный локдаун. Хане около сорока, чуть больше. Она работает в магазине и живет обычную одинокую жизнь, время от времени меняя работы. Не слишком часто и не слишком редко, по обстоятельствам. Однажды в одной из статей в интернете она натыкается на знакомое имя – Кимико Йошикава – и это имя превращается в прустовское печенье, о…
🕊17🐳9
Photo, posted without a caption
🐳16🕊8
«Kala» by Colin Walsh (2023) Маленький город на западном побережье Ирландии; исчезнувшая двадцать лет назад популярная девушка — этакая ирландская Лора Палмер; трое повзрослевших, но всё ещё отягощённых прошлым главных героев. «Кала» ирландского дебютанта Колина Уолша — практически идеальное чтение для тех, кому хочется одновременно саспенса, истории взросления и локального колорита. Книга не лишена шероховатостей и…
🕊21🐳17
Photo, posted without a caption
🐳28🕊6
When the Museum Is Closed by Emi Yagi (2025) У Рики новая подработка: раз в неделю, по понедельникам, когда музей закрыт для посетителей, она должна общаться со статуей Венеры. На латыни. Просто поддерживать приятную беседу, но Венера – не самая простая собеседница, да и в “греческом зале” стоит не только она одна, но и другие боги, иногда со своими питомцами, выполняющими роль чеховского ружья. Странная, но такая …
🐳41🕊7
🥁🥁🥁 Международную Букеровскую премию 2026 года получил Taiwan Travelogue by Yáng Shuāng-zǐ (перевод на английский Лин Кинг)! Молодая японская писательница на волне успеха своего дебютного романа получает приглашение на Тайвань, чтобы писать заметки о том, как прекрасно расширение империи сказалось на жизни островитян. Не поддерживая расширение, приглашение она все же принимает: писательница любит путешествовать, но …
🐳27🕊11
Photo, posted without a caption
🐳10🕊7
The Witch by Marie NDiaye (1996) Translated by Jordan Stump (2026) #IntBookerShort_2026 #IntBookerLong_2026 Роман Мари Ндиайе попал в короткий список Международного Букера без малого тридцать лет спустя после первой публикации. Не знаю почему, но этот факт меня очень удивил, и именно им я решила поделиться в первую очередь. Можно было бы долго говорить о том, что «Ведьма» не утратила актуальности за три десятилети…
🐳21🕊8
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @read_original. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 401,740 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Не перевелись ещё” (@read_original), 2,607 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/read_original.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.