4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,357–7,374 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 15:38
7,372
+7
10 Aug 2026, 16:21
7,365
+5
7 Aug 2026, 07:31
7,360
+1
6 Aug 2026, 22:02
7,359
first reading
Engagement
29 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.9%
avg views ÷ 7,372 subscribers
Avg views / post
879
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 29 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
29 (22 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
25,504
Reactions total
651
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 17:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
651 reactions across 29 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
371
57.0%
custom 5275994154902512894
85
13.1%
👎
46
7.07%
🤝
43
6.61%
🤡
27
4.15%
👍
17
2.61%
🤔
17
2.61%
😁
11
1.69%
❤
8
1.23%
👏
7
1.08%
🤯
5
0.768%
🏆
4
0.614%
😢
4
0.614%
💯
3
0.461%
🙏
3
0.461%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 651reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
22
across the posts below
Posts paid on
22
of 29 we hold a reading for · 76%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @re_break. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 29 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🎾 Прогноз на итоги Монреаля 🍁
Еще вчера присмотрел в специальной линии БК PARI вариант на итоги Мастерса в Монреале. На титул Ходара ИЛИ Шелтона предлагали коэффициент 2.30. И, мне кажется, вариант довольно привлекательный. К сегодняшнему дню котировка чуть просела, но все еще выглядит неплохо.
Во-первых, парни являются двумя главными фаворитами турнира еще до стадии 1/8 финала. И сохраняют этот статус накануне чет…
🎾 Прогноз на Монреаль 🍁
Из-за дождя вчерашние матчи не состоялись, поэтому напоминаю о двух активных прогнозах помимо сегодняшнего.
🇪🇸 Ходар – Фис 🇫🇷✅
🇮🇹 Дардери – Накашима 🇺🇸✅
🎾 Меншик – Шелтон 🇺🇸: кэф 1.75 ✅
https://stavka.tv/matches/tennis/11-08-2026-mensik-jakub-shelton-ben#tips-100?utm_source=social&utm_medium=tg_rebreak&utm_campaign=menshe1208
🎾 Ребрейк в MAX. Подписывайся!
🎾 Рафаэль Ходар – главный фаворит Монреаля 🔥
Наши партнеры из БК Пари принимают ставки на итоги Rogers Cup прямо посреди турнира! Единственный представитель топ-10 рейтинга Бен Шелтон внезапно потерял статус главного фаворита перед четвертьфиналами 🤔
Предлагаем ознакомиться с коэффициентами на чемпионство всех участников 1/4 финала:
1️⃣🇪🇸 Рафаэль Ходар (кэф 4.40);
2️⃣🇺🇸 Бен Шелтон (4.90);
3️⃣🇫🇷 Артур Фис (5.25);
4…
🎾 ЭКСПРЕСС НА МОНРЕАЛЬ 🔥
Мастерс в Монреале впечатляет своими результатами – многие фавориты уже покинули турнир. Может быть, оставшиеся не ударят в грязь лицом? Рассмотрим экспресс из лучших фаворитов игрового дня 👇
1️⃣ 🇳🇱 Грикспор – Арнальди 🇮🇹
Грикспор уже прибил на турнире самого Зверева, а на харде его подача и форхенд выглядят куда опаснее, чем на грунте, где Таллон залился Арнальди в прошлой личке. Итальяне…
🎾 Бен Шелтон и Томми Пол – главные фавориты Монреаля 🔥
Наши партнеры из БК Пари принимают ставки на итоги Rogers Cup прямо посреди турнира! Стартовые раунды канадского Мастерса удивили результатами, борьбу за титул продолжают всего 2 представителя топ-10 рейтинга, а действующий чемпион Бен Шелтон внезапно стал главным фаворитом на защиту титула.
Предлагаем ознакомиться с главными фаворитами турнира перед 1/16 финал…
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @re_break. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@re_break edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ребрейк | Прогнозы на теннис” (@re_break), 7,372 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/re_break.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
