Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for رد شبهات المشككين

Channel

رد شبهات المشككين

@rdshbhatalmshkkeen

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,163subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001951612105
TypeChannel
Username@rdshbhatalmshkkeen
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/rdshbhatalmshkkeen

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,1581,1651,161.514 August 2026 — 1,158 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,159 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,158 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,161 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,163 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,164 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,162 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1,158 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,165 subscribers16 September 2026 — 1,163 subscribers1,16314 August 202616 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 33 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,157–1,166 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 00:401,163-2
12 Sept 2026, 12:571,165+7
8 Sept 2026, 11:351,158-4
3 Sept 2026, 10:051,162-2
27 Aug 2026, 22:481,164+1
24 Aug 2026, 23:541,163+2
21 Aug 2026, 03:071,161+3
18 Aug 2026, 12:281,158-1
15 Aug 2026, 02:061,159+1
14 Aug 2026, 05:481,158first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 31 July 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

29 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1862.1%
👍931.0%
👏26.90%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2024 to 9 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Jan 2025, 00:16 UTC≈2,660 views6 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

بـــــــــشرى ســـــارَّة، لجميع المهتمين بدراسة علوم القرآن الكريم..🎈✨️ 📢 تُعلن الأكاديمية الإسلامية لمقارنة الأديان عن فرصة استثنائية للتسجيل في مادة: 📜 تاريخ القرآن وسلامته من التحريف 📜 🗓️ تبدأ الدراسة: "يوم السبت، 11 يناير 2025"، بواقع محاضرة واحدة كل أسبوعين. ⏳️ موعـــــد الحضـــــور: ▪︎ التاســــعة 🕘 مساءً: بتوقيت مكة. ▪︎ الثامنـــــة 🕗 مساءً: بتوقيت القاهرة. ⛔️ كيفيــة الحضـــ

6

Signed Noor Elmimony

7 Jan 2025, 14:17 UTC≈1,950 views5 reactionsread 14 August 2026

السؤال روي عن هشام بن عروة عن أبيه أنه قال: سُئِلت عائشة عن لحن القرآن، عن قوله تعالى: (إن هذان لساحران) وعن قوله تعالى: (والمقيمين الصلاة والمؤتون الزكاة) وعن قوله تعالى: (إنّ الذين آمنوا والذين هادوا والنصارى والصابئون). فقالت: يابن أخي، هذا من عمل الكُتَّاب، قد أخطأوا في الكتاب الإجابه أولاً: بأن هذه الروايات مهما يكن سندها صحيحاً، فإنها مخالفة للمتواتر القاطع، ومعارض القاطع ساقط مردود، فلا يلتفت إليها، ولا يعم

👍5

Signed Noor Elmimony

7 Jan 2025, 14:15 UTC≈1,330 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

#منقول من الأخ رسيم

Signed Noor Elmimony

7 Jan 2025, 14:15 UTC≈1,340 views6 reactionsread 14 August 2026

ذكر الله سبحانه و تعالى عز و جل في القران بأننا كنا نطفة و من نطفة لعلقه ! و من علقه لمضغه ! و من مضغه لعظام ثم كُسيت العظام لحماً أعوذ بالله من الشيطان الرجيم ثُمَّ خَلَقْنَا النُّطْفَةَ عَلَقَةً فَخَلَقْنَا الْعَلَقَةَ مُضْغَةً فَخَلَقْنَا الْمُضْغَةَ عِظَامًا فَكَسَوْنَا الْعِظَامَ لَحْمًا ثُمَّ أَنشَأْنَاهُ خَلْقًا آخَرَ ۚ فَتَبَارَكَ اللَّهُ أَحْسَنُ الْخَالِقِينَ إن كل التفاصيل الدقيقة هذه و اللاتي هن بالضبط م

4👍2

Signed Noor Elmimony

7 Jan 2025, 14:03 UTC957 views1 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

1

Signed Noor Elmimony

7 Jan 2025, 14:03 UTC950 views3 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

تعلم الصحابي حارث بن كلده من كتب الطب اليوناني

👏2👍1

Signed Noor Elmimony

7 Jan 2025, 14:03 UTC923 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

شبهة #كسونا_العظام_لحما

Signed Noor Elmimony

7 Jan 2025, 14:03 UTC≈1,120 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed Noor Elmimony

7 Jan 2025, 14:03 UTC≈1,180 viewsread 14 August 2026

https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1287982-overview?fbclid=IwY2xjawHqDv5leHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHXq15NLIhECy15BkLvQqAcwdy4onocnBgAdTF9U9OaFSLfgS89Ipf2Od5w_aem_CDgPzc2XlJtl_CGe7RjgaQ#a1

Signed Noor Elmimony

7 Jan 2025, 14:03 UTC724 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed Noor Elmimony

7 Jan 2025, 14:03 UTC802 viewsread 14 August 2026

https://www.ehd.org/dev_article_unit6.php?fbclid=IwY2xjawHqD1xleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHZW-fzsRqB_PVxwwDUNFAMGP3tpHsjg6v8YejLk5MlD_U04jxD-4JBUoPg_aem_89yJHRmcxRwIqydIM55jWA

Signed Noor Elmimony

7 Jan 2025, 14:03 UTC925 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

المقصود بالغرضوف

Signed Noor Elmimony

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @rdshbhatalmshkkeen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

📕 تعلم الانجليزية 📕
@English7711 · 48,959
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“رد شبهات المشككين” (@rdshbhatalmshkkeen), 1,163 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rdshbhatalmshkkeen.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.