Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ʀᴅʀᴍ

@rdrm_k

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

95subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001853786678
TypeChannel
Username@rdrm_k
Created2 January 2023measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/rdrm_k

Growth

9512 Aug 2026, 11:01 — 95 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 19:57 — 95 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 11:0112 Aug 2026, 19:57
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 94–96 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 19:5795no change
12 Aug 2026, 11:0195first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 2 January 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

100 reactions across 4 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53640711265509844922020.0%
custom 53618418624307028261616.0%
custom 53640128223699415681414.0%
custom 53616833394827757661212.0%
custom 53616880768317015611111.0%
custom 536170762322786674499.00%
custom 536186481473593266488.00%
custom 536160313526348954666.00%
custom 536194638475482047444.00%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 100reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 2 January 2023 to 26 July 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Jul 2024, 11:54 UTC≈1,250 views41 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 53617076232278667449custom 53640711265509844927custom 53616031352634895466custom 53640128223699415685custom 53616833394827757664custom 53619463847548204744custom 53616880768317015612custom 53618418624307028262

25 Jul 2024, 13:52 UTC≈1,020 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026

закиньте на рк

custom 53640711265509844928custom 53616880768317015615custom 53618418624307028265custom 53616833394827757662custom 53618648147359326642custom 53640128223699415682

24 Jul 2024, 18:56 UTC≈2,750 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

custom 53618418624307028267custom 53616833394827757664custom 53640128223699415684custom 53616880768317015612custom 53618648147359326642custom 53640711265509844922

24 Jul 2024, 18:06 UTC≈1,140 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

› patent

custom 53640128223699415683custom 53640711265509844923custom 53616833394827757662custom 53616880768317015612custom 53618418624307028262custom 53618648147359326642

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @rdrm_k. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,009,635 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ʀᴅʀᴍ” (@rdrm_k), 95 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rdrm_k.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.