Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for قِسطاس .

Channel

قِسطاس .

@rcwr7

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

731subscribers

+11 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002098901550
TypeChannel
Username@rcwr7
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 October 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/rcwr7

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

720733726.59 August 2026 — 720 subscribers9 August 2026 — 720 subscribers17 August 2026 — 725 subscribers24 August 2026 — 727 subscribers11 September 2026 — 733 subscribers18 September 2026 — 730 subscribers3 October 2026 — 731 subscribers7319 August 20263 October 2026
7 measurements spanning 56 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 718–735 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Oct 2026, 20:16731+1
18 Sept 2026, 12:01730-3
11 Sept 2026, 02:18733+6
24 Aug 2026, 16:24727+2
17 Aug 2026, 17:48725+5
9 Aug 2026, 17:42720no change
9 Aug 2026, 04:17720first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

119 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤8773.1%
❤‍🔥1613.4%
👍86.72%
💯86.72%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 119 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 04:55 UTC420 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

مَثلاً مَثلاً رَجُل لَم أرى لَهُ سوى نِصف صوره عام 2025 اليَوم فَقط رأيتُ 5 صور لهُ .. مَن يَتحمل ذَنب هذا السَبق الإعلامي !

👍5

7 Aug 2026, 04:52 UTC367 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

تَداول صَوّر لِـ شَخصيات مَعروفه و تَحتوي الصوره أيضاً على شَخصيات تَتجَنب الظهور الإعلامي و نَشر تِلكَ الصّور و إظهار الوَجّة كامِل حَرام شَرعاً خصوصاً مَع قادة المُقاومة .. صارت قديمه مال السَبق الإعلامي و اني نشرت قبل فلان و فلان نشر قبلي

❤3

4 Aug 2026, 17:32 UTC304 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

لواء 41 الحركة فكت الارتباط وياهم لواء 41 على طول الشارع رافع صور الشيخ و رايات العَصائب و مسمي الموكب أخوة زينب ..

❤‍🔥6❤5

4 Aug 2026, 16:56 UTC558 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

وزارة الخارجيه الأيرانية تگول للسعوديه ليش قصفتوا العراق وزارة الخارجية العراقيه : لا أسمع لا ارى لا أتكلم

❤6

4 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC368 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

تَنتهي الخِدمة ، يَعود الخَدّم و يَبقى الحُسين ، لا وَحيداً بل يَبقى هوَ المُنتصر الوَحيّد . أيامٌ مَعدوده مِن كُلّ عام هَنيئاً لِـ مَنّ أصلّح ذاتهُ و نَفسهُ فيها ..

❤5

4 Aug 2026, 04:35 UTC253 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

"قاتلوا" مِن الإرشيف ..

❤‍🔥4

1 Aug 2026, 12:38 UTC295 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

تُنشر لأول مَرة .. الشَهيد القائد مراد عَبّد الكريم العگيلي

❤13

31 Jul 2026, 22:53 UTC343 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

عَجيبٌ أمر الأذلاء يُهاجِمهم أحدهم و يُدافع عَنهم الآخر بالمُقابل يُهاجِمون المُدافع عَنهم ! أذلةُ قَومِنا مِنَ أينّ جاؤوا !

👍3❤1

30 Jul 2026, 19:48 UTC462 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

كم كُنا نَفتقد مِثل هكذا صَفحات تُدافع و تُهاجم مِنَ يُحارِبُنا قَديماً و حَديثاً إحتياجُها ضَروي للرَد على مَن يَنكُر او يُهدد او او او .. يَكفي زَمن السكوت الذي أصبحَ فيهِ الجاهل يُحارِبُنا ….

💯8❤1

30 Jul 2026, 19:40 UTC573 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

إن الإصرار على النهج الوضيع القائم على مساواة الجلاد بالضحية، والقاتل بالمقتول، والمعتدي بصاحب الحق، ثم البحث عن المبررات للعدوان بدل إدانته، ليس مجرد انحراف في الموقف، بل سقوطٌ وانهيارٌ كامل في منظومة القيم والمروءة،إنه خطاب يثير الاشمئزاز لما يحمله من ابتذالٍ، وتجردٍ من أدنى معاني الوطنية الحقيقية والحمية. ولذلك فإننا نترفع عن الانحدار إلى هذا المستوى، ونأنف أن نُضفي عليه شرعيةً بالجدال والرد، ولا سيما أن الاعتداء…

❤8

30 Jul 2026, 15:05 UTC474 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

هذا طَبع الدوني ويه أهله رخيص يمدح الصبير و يعير الشلب أي گمر يختارله كرسي بسماه لازم على الگاه ينبحله جلب ..

❤4

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @rcwr7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

شِغَف ْ | shaghaf
@bgbbb · 62,315
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“قِسطاس .” (@rcwr7), 731 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rcwr7.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.