2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 267–269 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 01:41
268
no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:01
268
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 12 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
35.9%
avg views ÷ 268 subscribers
Avg views / post
96.2
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held
16 (12 June 2026 – 31 July 2026)
Views total
577
Reactions total
40
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 03:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
138 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
58
42.0%
🔥
41
29.7%
❤
17
12.3%
🤝
9
6.52%
🎉
7
5.07%
⚡
6
4.35%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 138reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🥳 С Днем системного администратора!
Пока большинство сотрудников спокойно работает с корпоративными сервисами, редко задумываясь о том, почему «всё просто работает», системные администраторы следят за тем, чтобы инфраструктура оставалась стабильной, доступной и безопасной.
В сфере информационной безопасности роль системного администратора особенно важна. Даже самые современные средства защиты не будут эффективны бе…
🔔«Код Безопасности» завершает техподдержку vGate 5.0
C 28 июля 2026 года компания прекращает выпуск обновлений безопасности и оказание технической поддержки для СЗИ vGate версии 5.0. К актуальным и поддерживаемым сертифицированным версиям, доступным к продаже, относятся:
🟢vGate 4.95 (сервер авторизации на базе ОС Windows);
🟢vGate 5.1 (сервер авторизации на базе ОС Linux).
❕Для обеспечения непрерывной защиты инфрас…
✅ Выбираем средства защиты информации для ИСПДн: как организовать защиту для 4-го уровня защищенности
Продолжаем серию материалов о защите информационных систем персональных данных. В первой части мы разобрали нормативную базу и критерии, по которым определяется уровень защищенности персональных данных.
Теперь переходим к практике: какие меры и средства защиты необходимы для ИСПДн с 4-м уровнем защищенности (УЗ-4).…
На какую тему хотели бы послушать следующий вебинар?
«DLP-системы: защита от утечек данных — кому это нужно и как правильно внедрить»19%
«Новые меры ФСТЭК: что изменилось и какие сертифицированные СЗИ выбрать»77%
«Инвентаризация ИТ-активов в 2026 году: почему нельзя откладывать и с чего начать выбор инструмента»42%
The shares total 138%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🔥 Мы ценим ваш отклик на вебинары по информационной безопасности
И следующий вебинар хотим провести на тему, которую выберете вы.
Ниже - голосование 👇
Будем рады вашему отклику!
🔊 Где проходит граница между возможностями ИИ и требованиями информационной безопасности?
17 июля генеральный директор ООО «Рубикон» Евгений Мартынов принял участие в круглом столе «Бизнес внедряет и защищается: где баланс между ИИ и ИБ?», организованном деловым медиа «Эксперт Юг».
Встреча объединила представителей бизнеса, государственных структур, научного сообщества и ИТ-компаний для обсуждения практических аспе…
⛽️ Топливный кризис — это не только про пустые АЗС
Это еще и про информационную безопасность.
В новой статье разбираем, как нехватка топлива становится катализатором киберугроз, и почему цифровая устойчивость сегодня зависит и от того, есть ли дизель для резервных генераторов.
Читайте в нашем новом материале 👇
https://rcngroup.ru/blog/gorjuchee-i-dannye-kak-toplivnyj-krizis-bet-po-informacionnoj-bezopasnosti/
#п…
📢 Итоги вебинара «Оценка безопасности: сценарий применения КЗИ»
18 июня мы провели вебинар, где подробно разобрали новую методику ФСТЭК России по оценке показателя состояния технической защиты информации и обсудили практическое применение коэффициента защищённости информации (КЗИ).
Краткое содержание вебинара:
• что представляет собой КЗИ и какое место он занимает в новых требованиях ФСТЭК России;
• кому необходим…
📢 Отвечаем на вопросы по решениям «Код Безопасности»
По итогам нашего круглого стола по информационной безопасности 2026 мы получили ряд технических вопросов от участников. Часть из них требовала детальных комментариев напрямую от вендора.
Поэтому мы обратились к нашему партнеру, компании «Код Безопасности», и подготовили для вас небольшое экспертное интервью.
На вопросы ответил Андрей Борисов, ведущий специалист …
📢 Новости информационной безопасности за июнь 2026 года
В июне 2026 года в центре внимания киберпреступников традиционно оказались сфера промышленности, ТЭК и госсектор, также большое количество атак фиксировалось в сфере здравоохранения и финансов. Все атаки на площадку ПМЭФ успешно отразили, Яндекс столкнулся с масштабным сбоем
🟢Масштабный сбой сервисов Яндекса
30 июня появились сообщения о сбоях в работе ряда се…
📝 Обзор отечественного рынка EDR-систем
Методический документ ФСТЭК от 12.04.2026 кардинально меняет правила игры. Регулятор больше не считает классические антивирусы достаточной мерой.
Теперь фокус смещается на глубокий анализ поведения, мониторинг процессов и оперативное реагирование на угрозы непосредственно на конечных точках.
Именно для реализации этих мер защиты и созданы системы класса EDR (Endpoint Detectio…
📋 Новая методика ФСТЭК:
аттестация теперь требует полноценного анализа защищенности
Новая методика ФСТЭК от 25.11.2025 распространила обязательный анализ уязвимостей на все основные процедуры оценки защищенности информационных систем.
Раньше можно было ограничиться средством анализа защищенности и сверкой с уязвимостями из банка данных угроз ФСТЭК. Теперь требования конкретизированы: нужно проводить и внешнее скан…
❤3👍3🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @rcngroup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
На какую тему хотели бы послушать следующий вебинар?
«DLP-системы: защита от утечек данных — кому это нужно и как правильно внедрить»19%
«Новые меры ФСТЭК: что изменилось и какие сертифицированные СЗИ выбрать»77%
«Инвентаризация ИТ-активов в 2026 году: почему нельзя откладывать и с чего начать выбор инструмента»42%
The shares total 138%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 31 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 306,446 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Рубикон” (@rcngroup), 268 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rcngroup.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.