Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

rc_addicted ✨✨✨

@rc_addicted777

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,612subscribers

+23 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003659694756
TypeChannel
Username@rc_addicted777
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/rc_addicted777

Growth

1,5861,6121,5997 August 2026 — 1,589 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,588 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,586 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,612 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,582–1,616 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 09:351,612+26
10 Aug 2026, 13:321,586-2
7 Aug 2026, 05:461,588-1
7 Aug 2026, 03:011,589first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.7%
avg views ÷ 1,612 subscribers
Avg views / post
511
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
25.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held12 (4 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total6,128
Reactions total1,545
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 06s
Average length
1m 06s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,545 reactions across 12 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 519283670321937723737424.2%
custom 525386918063297841732120.8%
custom 537090202722214230620513.3%
custom 526736154551544063619312.5%
custom 546308585518898778115810.2%
custom 5465430726943975300986.34%
custom 5330160689006791268785.05%
custom 5463332442146350413644.14%
custom 5258209107646650041402.59%
custom 5958449902592726051140.906%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,545reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
40
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 12 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
15
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rc_addicted777. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:37 UTC303 views103 reactions15 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🥹🥹🥹

custom 525386918063297841752custom 537090202722214230627custom 546543072694397530020custom 51928367032193772374

6 Aug 2026, 12:51 UTC461 views65 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://x.com/comingbacktox?s=11&t=5I4uNZ3BC1NS5AnCo1ks9w Мои дорогие твиттерские мьюшки!!!! Пора возвращать прайм 😡😡😡😡

custom 519283670321937723733custom 525386918063297841717custom 537090202722214230615

6 Aug 2026, 06:50 UTC516 views135 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

А мой Каин-то не промах! Становится популярным в инстаграме, жаль не в моем только Сука как меня это заебало ЭТО НЕ МНОЮ СОЗДАННЫЙ ИНСТАГРАМ, если что, это как обычно ворье тупорылое

custom 519283670321937723773custom 533016068900679126835custom 526736154551544063627

5 Aug 2026, 19:22 UTC547 views131 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Или еще не завершим

custom 525386918063297841773custom 546543072694397530033custom 519283670321937723720custom 52673615455154406363custom 53709020272221423062

5 Aug 2026, 19:05 UTC520 views175 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вечер этим завершим.

custom 537090202722214230694custom 546308585518898778143custom 546333244214635041331custom 51928367032193772375custom 52582091076466500411custom 54654307269439753001

5 Aug 2026, 14:07 UTC426 views67 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @bea_sinnerVideo

⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️🔥 ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 🔞 Кошки Ашика, пришло время! Вы можете посмотреть полные версии тут и тут ❤ Анимация и монтаж: Записки Мяу Обработка и сценарий: bea_sinner Помощь в переводе: Твоя секретаря ветка & груша зибзиб 🌟Инфо🌟Буст🌟Анон🌟 #liren #лирен #ashriel #ашриэль #обработка@bea_sinner

custom 519283670321937723741custom 526736154551544063613custom 595844990259272605112custom 53709020272221423061

5 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTC528 views172 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Контент по РЛ я говорила да?😂

custom 519283670321937723790custom 525820910764665004138custom 546308585518898778133custom 52673615455154406368custom 54654307269439753002custom 53709020272221423061

5 Aug 2026, 09:47 UTC550 views132 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ладно, пока готовлюсь морально к РЛ, держите вип

custom 537090202722214230660custom 533016068900679126843custom 525386918063297841727custom 52673615455154406362

5 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTC541 views105 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Контент по РЛ Вселенной друзья?😳😳😳 Витька с Максом? Ваше мнение 🤩🤩🤩

custom 546308585518898778152custom 525386918063297841729custom 526736154551544063622custom 59584499025927260512

4 Aug 2026, 20:21 UTC593 views126 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🥹🥹🥹 #надин #поппи #тс2 #тенисентфора2

custom 519283670321937723761custom 526736154551544063629custom 546308585518898778124custom 52538691806329784175custom 53709020272221423064custom 54654307269439753003

4 Aug 2026, 19:04 UTC571 views166 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💕💕💕

custom 526736154551544063687custom 546543072694397530039custom 525386918063297841722custom 51928367032193772379custom 54633324421463504134custom 54630858551889877813custom 52582091076466500411custom 53709020272221423061

4 Aug 2026, 18:27 UTC572 views168 reactions15 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Нежнейшие 🥹🥹🥹

custom 525386918063297841796custom 519283670321937723738custom 546333244214635041329custom 54630858551889877813custom 52673615455154406362

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @rc_addicted777. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 103,552 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“rc_addicted ✨✨✨” (@rc_addicted777), 1,612 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rc_addicted777.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.