Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Аполлинария

@raytmansun

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

385subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002744751723
TypeChannel
Username@raytmansun
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/raytmansun

Growth

385388386.57 Aug 2026, 18:30 — 388 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 06:03 — 388 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 16:17 — 385 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 18:308 Aug 2026, 16:17
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 385–388 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 16:17385-3
8 Aug 2026, 06:03388no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:30388first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 4 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.8%
avg views ÷ 385 subscribers
Avg views / post
126
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.45%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held16 (4 July 202631 July 2026)
Views total1,011
Reactions total84
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

190 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6835.8%
❤‍🔥5528.9%
💔3820.0%
💋178.95%
💘52.63%
🔥42.11%
👻21.05%
👎10.526%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 190reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 20:00 UTC111 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026

На такой ноте и закончим день. Спасибо, что были со мной 👻 Покааааа

💔135👻2

31 Jul 2026, 19:50 UTC135 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#кэсси @nighttyped @nighttyped_chbb

❤‍🔥94💘3💋1

31 Jul 2026, 17:31 UTC106 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#лена #эрик @nighttyped @nighttyped_chbb

❤‍🔥8💋32💘1

31 Jul 2026, 13:07 UTC94 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

?

  1. Дзл39%
  2. Тр61%
  3. Пустые56%

The shares total 156%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

5❤‍🔥2💋2

31 Jul 2026, 10:26 UTC133 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

"Пока цветут васильки" Лето в деревне всегда пахло по-особенному. Свежескошенной травой, теплым молоком, клубникой с грядки и рекой, в которой отражалось огромное вечернее солнце. Лена приехала к бабушке всего на месяц. После шумного города деревня казалась слишком тихой. Здесь время будто забывало идти вперед. В первый же день она встретила его. — Ты новенькая? — раздался голос позади. Она обернулась. Парень

10❤‍🔥3💋3🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 05:40 UTC157 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

?

  1. Мини фф52%
  2. Фоны55%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

❤‍🔥2

31 Jul 2026, 05:39 UTC153 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Сегодня, в честь своего дня рождения, провожу с вами день 👻 С чего хотите начать его?

❤‍🔥4💘1

9 Jul 2026, 17:04 UTC389 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я решила, что уйду. Я думала, что перезагрузилась, но, оказывается, нет. У меня все так же нет идей и времени делать что-то для канала, плюс ещё очень упал актив без этого тоже никак. Так что я ухожу. Что будет с каналом, не знаю удалю или нет решу потом. Спасибо, что все это время были со мной. Я очень рада, что могла хоть какое-то время радовать вас своим контентом. Всем пока 👻

💔255❤‍🔥3👎1

8 Jul 2026, 20:35 UTC247 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

В комнате повисла тишина. Даже пыль, казалось, замерла в воздухе. Чейз не сводил глаз с девушки. — Это невозможно… — повторил он уже тише. Она усмехнулась. — Ты всегда говоришь именно это, когда видишь меня снова. — Снова?.. Лена резко посмотрела на Чейза. — Что она имеет в виду? Он промолчал. — Отвечай! Но вместо него заговорила незнакомка. — Он не рассказывал? Конечно не рассказывал. Он вообще плохо спр

7❤‍🔥2💋2

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @raytmansun. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 Jul 2026, 13:07 UTCFinal Results18 voters

?

  1. Дзл39%
  2. Тр61%
  3. Пустые56%

The shares total 156%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

31 Jul 2026, 05:40 UTCFinal Results29 voters

?

  1. Мини фф52%
  2. Фоны55%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 31 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Аполлинария” (@raytmansun), 385 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/raytmansun.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.