Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for raynlluwi

Channel

raynlluwi

@raynlluwi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

210subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002242097010
TypeChannel
Username@raynlluwi
Descriptionwhere pencil meets paper, the magic begins
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/raynlluwi

Growth

21010 Aug 2026, 10:31 — 210 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 10:45 — 210 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 10:3110 Aug 2026, 10:45
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 209–211 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 10:45210no change
10 Aug 2026, 10:31210first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 7 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
57.5%
avg views ÷ 210 subscribers
Avg views / post
121
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held13 (7 December 20253 August 2026)
Views total362
Reactions total47
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 10:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
122
Videos
10
Links
6

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
9s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

313 reactions across 12 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54452677238000284376019.2%
custom 51906800154564613503410.9%
custom 5357098504843966356309.58%
custom 5328098202761579230278.63%
🦄278.63%
custom 5327780662944485195268.31%
custom 5316815186236048668237.35%
custom 5255861796350224063216.71%
💘206.39%
😈175.43%
custom 5334756578891423965165.11%
👾92.88%
custom 526034321676647898630.958%

Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 313reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 7 December 2025 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC195 views22 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️мини коллаб с @mrtteli !!🌟

custom 53168151862360486689custom 53280982027615792306custom 53570985048439663563🦄1custom 51906800154564613501custom 52558617963502240631custom 53277806629444851951

31 Jul 2026, 21:45 UTC105 views25 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

моя птичка

custom 535709850484396635611custom 52558617963502240635custom 53277806629444851954custom 53280982027615792302🦄1custom 51906800154564613501custom 54452677238000284371

16 Jul 2026, 09:45 UTC237 views28 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

😀😀😀😀𝒲𝒽𝒶𝓉 𝓌𝑜𝓊𝓁𝒹 𝓎𝑜𝓊 😀 😀 𝓁𝒾𝓀𝑒 𝓉𝑜 𝓀𝓃𝑜𝓌 𝓉𝒽𝒾𝓈 😀 𝓉𝒾𝓂𝑒?🔤💎💜 😀😀 😀 #hsr #art @raynlluwi

custom 531681518623604866812custom 53347565788914239654custom 53277806629444851953custom 54452677238000284373custom 51906800154564613502🦄1custom 52558617963502240631custom 53280982027615792301

14 Feb 2026, 18:22 UTC291 views31 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🎀Happy Valentine’s Day !! 🎀 🤩🤩 ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 🤩🤩 @raynlluwi #fullmetalalchemist #art

custom 532809820276157923012custom 52558617963502240636💘5custom 53277806629444851952custom 53347565788914239652🦄1custom 51906800154564613501custom 53570985048439663561

12 Feb 2026, 17:46 UTC252 views31 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

коллаб с любимой

😈8💘5custom 51906800154564613505custom 53277806629444851954custom 52558617963502240632custom 53347565788914239652custom 53570985048439663562🦄1

16 Jan 2026, 19:02 UTC281 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

я не шучу, товарищи 👇 https://youtu.be/4iBdTaQ_QxY?si=t01DUgR_9Yd9Gu3r

custom 54452677238000284377

16 Jan 2026, 19:01 UTC256 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026

кем я хочу быть? чуваком, который выложил 3-х часовое видео, где он просто флексит под все саундтреки из дельтаруна

🦄9custom 51906800154564613501custom 53168151862360486681custom 54452677238000284371

26 Dec 2025, 08:50 UTC351 views34 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

я снова повелась на красивую тетю и что 🙂

custom 544526772380002843713custom 51906800154564613506custom 52558617963502240636custom 52603432167664789863custom 53277806629444851952🦄1custom 53168151862360486681custom 53280982027615792301

18 Dec 2025, 15:34 UTC411 views23 reactionsread 10 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

💘8custom 51906800154564613505custom 53570985048439663564😈3👾1custom 53347565788914239651custom 54452677238000284371

18 Dec 2025, 15:34 UTC518 views40 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

⭐️⭐️✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ ⭐️⭐️"why tell me, father, should i have all these chains?…" ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ #fnaf #art @raynlluwi

custom 544526772380002843712custom 53277806629444851958😈6custom 53347565788914239655🦄3💘2custom 53570985048439663562👾1

10 Dec 2025, 11:03 UTC285 views29 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

нет ничего более вдохновляющего на рисование, чем мой плейлист с песнями по фнафу, которые я коллекционирую всю свою осознанную жизнь

custom 544526772380002843711custom 51906800154564613508custom 53570985048439663565custom 53280982027615792303custom 53277806629444851951custom 53347565788914239651

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @raynlluwi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 615,226 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“raynlluwi” (@raynlluwi), 210 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/raynlluwi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.