Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

КАЛыбельная Раена 🔮

@ray3n27

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,387subscribers

+121 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001716565355
TypeChannel
Username@ray3n27
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ray3n27

Growth

1,2661,3871,326.56 August 2026 — 1,266 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,269 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,384 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,387 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +121. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,248–1,405 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:281,387+3
10 Aug 2026, 04:201,384+115
7 Aug 2026, 09:061,269+3
6 Aug 2026, 22:451,266first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
71.5%
avg views ÷ 1,387 subscribers
Avg views / post
992
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held19 (1 August 20266 August 2026)
Views total18,851
Reactions total221
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 22:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

221 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 547010905443088324817880.5%
💅198.60%
🔥177.69%
🍓41.81%
😢20.905%
💩10.452%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 221reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ray3n27. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 18:06 UTC285 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

фрикле

custom 547010905443088324824🔥2

6 Aug 2026, 09:17 UTC422 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 54701090544308832489

5 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC467 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://www.twitch.tv/iray3n

custom 54701090544308832484

5 Aug 2026, 17:19 UTC489 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Я даже представить не могу, что Свалка может расшириться хоть на 1/100 масштабов бэкрумс(они тоже так начинали)

custom 54701090544308832487

5 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC489 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Меня в фандом вики добавили ахахаххахаа

custom 54701090544308832486

5 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTC495 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

приватный тгк https://t.me/+1HPp6JTL2yFhNTUy

custom 54701090544308832481

5 Aug 2026, 14:56 UTC450 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Как оказалось картинка Одиссеи в ру кинотеатрах вообще не передала того, что в оригинале: где-то пересвет,а где-то наоборот слишком темно(ну кстати это было заметно, но я списал это на урезанный аймах). Ну и звук порой прям пердел(хоть крик Полифема вроде норм)

custom 54701090544308832481

4 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC556 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Посмотрел я Одиссею(по мотивам истории Раессея) Нуууу… чуть-чуть перехайп кинцо всё же(как и Оппенгеймер), но свои плюсы, как и минусы, есть. Картинка секс для глаз. Тут и аймах не нужен. Натуралистично, красиво, глубоко, но увы за этим ничего нет. Падение Трои, сцена в Аиде,превращение Церцеи и крик Полифема - круто синема. Агамемнон аура Патинсон лучшее, что есть в фильме, отыграл мразь прям хорошо. А Деймон имен

🍓4custom 54701090544308832482

3 Aug 2026, 21:49 UTC681 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026

1. Виноваты фугасы

🔥15custom 54701090544308832488

3 Aug 2026, 21:45 UTC678 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026

У меня есть мнение. личное мнение.

custom 547010905443088324815

3 Aug 2026, 15:40 UTC757 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

АХАХАХАХА 98 ПРЕФИКСОВ БОЛЬШЕ ! БОЛЬШЕЕ! https://freakrating.fun/?p=iray3n

custom 547010905443088324819

2 Aug 2026, 17:51 UTC833 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

«тгк раена ведь тоже есть в списке?»

custom 547010905443088324819

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ray3n27. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 273,401 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“КАЛыбельная Раена 🔮” (@ray3n27), 1,387 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ray3n27.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.