Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for RawDataBot

Bot

RawDataBot

@raw_data_bot

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

11,223monthly users

-333 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID1533228735
TypeBot
Username@raw_data_bot
First recorded21 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/raw_data_bot

Growth

10,86511,55611,210.57 August 2026 — 11,556 monthly users7 August 2026 — 11,548 monthly users11 August 2026 — 11,311 monthly users14 August 2026 — 11,259 monthly users15 August 2026 — 11,181 monthly users18 August 2026 — 10,865 monthly users21 August 2026 — 10,878 monthly users21 August 2026 — 10,878 monthly users24 August 2026 — 11,223 monthly users11,2237 August 202624 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 18 days, net -333. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,761–11,660 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every monthly users count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)Monthly usersChange
24 Aug 2026, 19:2811,223+345
21 Aug 2026, 21:2610,878no change
21 Aug 2026, 12:3610,878+13
18 Aug 2026, 09:4710,865-316
15 Aug 2026, 19:1311,181-78
14 Aug 2026, 08:2611,259-52
11 Aug 2026, 00:2711,311-237
7 Aug 2026, 20:2311,548-8
7 Aug 2026, 04:1511,556first reading

Engagement

No post feed to measure. Telegram publishes a readable post stream for channels, not for bots, so views, reactions and engagement rates do not exist for this entry — they are not missing, pending or withheld. The register records what this handle is and what it resolves to.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“RawDataBot” (@raw_data_bot), 11,223 monthly users as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/raw_data_bot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.