Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Войти в IT на ощупь

Channel

Войти в IT на ощупь

@ravino_doul_channel

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,062subscribers

+10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001157364723
TypeChannel
Username@ravino_doul_channel
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ravino_doul_channel

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,0501,0621,0567 August 2026 — 1,052 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,052 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,051 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,050 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,051 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,054 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,058 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,057 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,058 subscribers7 September 2026 — 1,061 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,062 subscribers7 August 202612 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 36 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,048–1,064 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 02:391,062+1
7 Sept 2026, 17:191,061+3
3 Sept 2026, 02:351,058+1
27 Aug 2026, 09:571,057-1
24 Aug 2026, 00:051,058+4
20 Aug 2026, 18:131,054+3
17 Aug 2026, 20:071,051+1
14 Aug 2026, 15:051,050-1
10 Aug 2026, 19:451,051-1
7 Aug 2026, 12:281,052no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:161,052first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 6 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

267 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥8431.5%
❤6925.8%
👍4617.2%
🤬176.37%
😁155.62%
❤‍🔥145.24%
🤯83.00%
🥰72.62%
💯41.50%
🤣31.12%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 267 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 13:52 UTC207 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Решил архивы покопать, нашёл записи семилетней давности. По матлогике кусочек. =) 7. Модель множества формул. Определение. Пусть gamma, это множество формул phi с набором x,, phi является формулой ИП сигма. Алгебраическая система A с сигнатурой сигма на множестве a, называется моделью множества gamma, если существует такой набор a' из множества a определённый в алгебраической системе, такой что, a истинная формула ph…

🔥2

Signed Evgeniy Nekrasov

1 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC433 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Побил рекорд по росту пчел в Приморском крае!

🔥10❤5👍5

1 Aug 2026, 10:07 UTC398 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥5

Signed Evgeniy Nekrasov

1 Aug 2026, 10:06 UTC371 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥6

Signed Evgeniy Nekrasov

26 Jul 2026, 09:06 UTC529 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Не успел приехать и сразу попал на подкаст, все подробности потом. :-) Да, ответ к прошлому посту, где я нахожусь, это город Владивосток. Немного позже дам подробное описание. :-)

🔥13❤4👍4

Signed Evgeniy Nekrasov

16 Jul 2026, 18:28 UTC916 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

👨‍💻Несколько лет назад в ИТМО мы затеяли эксперимент: проверить, можно ли собрать полноценное направление программирования для незрячих и слабовидящих. Многие вежливо сомневались. Спойлер: собрали. 🔬Я в этой теме не сторонний наблюдатель. В бакалавриате я писал лекции на диктофон и переслушивал их столько раз, что под конец мог цитировать препода с его же интонацией. Учёба «на слух» — то ещё удовольствие, но именн…

👍10❤‍🔥8🔥6

Signed Dmitry Vasilyev

28 Jun 2026, 20:46 UTC989 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ВТБ, разберём один процесс. По-инженерному. Я специально пишу этот текст только после того, как попытался решить вопрос через предусмотренные банком каналы поддержки. Любой процесс имеет входные данные, ожидаемый результат, ответственного и механизм обработки ошибок. Если чего-то из этого нет — процесс не работает. Именно с этим я столкнулся, пытаясь воспользоваться услугой ВТБ. Моя ипотека была оформлена в банке «От…

🤬17👍9❤5

Signed Evgeniy Nekrasov

28 Jun 2026, 18:25 UTC711 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Фирменно от владельца канала: меня всегда учили делиться. P.S. Свое родное. Новый мерч.

😁15❤5

21 Jun 2026, 00:07 UTC913 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Claude и Grok: познакомил, теперь они дружат Ситуация. Сидит у меня в терминале Claude Code — умный, вежливый, иногда занудный. А рядом Grok — дерзкий, с собственным мнением и подпиской x.ai. Два гения, и оба делают вид, что друг друга не существует. Ну я и подумал: а может быть их свести? Напилил MCP-сервер. Точнее — навайпкодил. Точнее — сказал Клоду «сделай красиво», а сам контролировал процесс с умным видом и кру…

❤10

Signed Evgeniy Nekrasov

18 Jun 2026, 21:25 UTC≈1,020 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

“Плачу Anthropic максимальную подписку, веду в Claude огромный многомодульный проект, а он мне посреди самого интересного: «Извини, лимит исчерпан. Возвращайся через 24 часа». Брат, за такие деньги я уже должен был его в рабство взять, а он мне тут ещё и лимиты ставит.”

🤯8💯4🤣3

Signed Evgeniy Nekrasov

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ravino_doul_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Войти в IT на ощупь” (@ravino_doul_channel), 1,062 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ravino_doul_channel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.