Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for •𝑨𝑹𝑨𝑴𝑨•

Channel

•𝑨𝑹𝑨𝑴𝑨•

@ravan_arama

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,521subscribers

-63 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003901139209
TypeChannel
Username@ravan_arama
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 26 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ravan_arama

Growth

1,5211,5841,552.59 August 2026 — 1,584 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,584 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,579 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,551 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,521 subscribers9 August 202615 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -63. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,512–1,593 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 16:071,521-30
12 Aug 2026, 03:111,551-28
9 Aug 2026, 11:521,579-5
9 Aug 2026, 01:301,584no change
9 Aug 2026, 01:171,584first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.7%
avg views ÷ 1,521 subscribers
Avg views / post
360
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (26 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total7,199
Reactions total97
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 01:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 29s
Average length
45s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

97 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3839.2%
👍2323.7%
👌1818.6%
🔥1818.6%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 97reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 14:38 UTC166 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026

عمیق ترین رشد و تحولات فردی، هنگام مطالعه یا مراقبه رخ نمیدهند بلکه در سه راهی تعارض اتفاق می‌افتند: یعنی در هنگام خشم، ترس و ناامیدی _هنر سخن گفتن با خود. ورونیکا تو گالوا #برش_کتاب @ravan_arama

🔥10

4 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC264 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

◽️اگر الان حالت خوب نیست، به این معنی نیست که زندگی‌ات هیچ وقت خوب نبوده. وقتی دچار خلق پایین میشی، مغزت فقط خاطره‌ها و تجربه‌هایی رو جلوی چشممون می‌ذاره که این حس رو تأیید می‌کنن. برای همین فکر می‌کنیم: «همیشه همین بوده... همیشه همین می‌مونه.» 📌اما این فقط یک خطای ذهنیه، نه حقیقت. قبل از اینکه برای تمام زندگیت حکم بدی، یادت باشه: حالت موقتیه، اما تصمیم‌هایی که توی اوج احساسات می‌گیری، ممکنه ماندگار باشن. به خودت زما

🔥8

4 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC245 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

📝تکنیک امروز این کار رو امتحان کن. ۱۵ دقیقه برای مغزت استراحت بساز. ❌نه خبر. نه شبکه‌های اجتماعی. نه گفت‌وگوهای سنگین. نه برای اینکه دنیا عوض شده... فقط برای اینکه سیستم عصبیت چند دقیقه از حالت آماده‌باش بیرون بیاد. مراقبت از روان، فرار از واقعیت نیست؛ کمک می‌کنه با توان بیشتری با واقعیت روبه‌رو بشیم.🪴 @ravan_arama

👍4

4 Aug 2026, 06:47 UTC324 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

•قرار نیست این روزها احساس امنیت کامل داشته باشیم. •قرار هم نیست روان‌شناسی واقعیت رو انکار کنه. 💡هدف اینه که ذهن و بدنمون آن‌قدر خسته نشن که توان ادامه دادن و تصمیم گرفتن رو از دست بدیم. @ravan_aram

5

4 Aug 2026, 06:36 UTC319 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

اشتباه بعدی اینه که فکر کنیم: «وقتی اوضاع اینه، پس هیچ کاری از دستم برنمیاد.» 📌اما پذیرش واقعیت با تسلیم شدن فرق داره. شاید نتونی شرایط بیرونی رو کنترل کنی، اما هنوز می‌تونی از خواب، تغذیه، ارتباط با عزیزانت و سلامت روانت مراقبت کنی. همین کارهای کوچک، باعث میشن کمتر فرسوده بشی. @ravan_arama

4

3 Aug 2026, 18:41 UTC376 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

❗️یکی از اشتباه‌هایی که خیلی‌ها می‌کنن اینه که خودشون رو سرزنش می‌کنن. «پس چرا با این همه تکنیک برای آروم کردن خودم، هنوز آروم نشدم؟» 📌واقعیت اینه که وقتی شرایط بیرون ناامنه، طبیعی است که سیستم عصبی هم احساس ناامنی کنه. این واکنش، نشانه ضعف نیست؛ نشانه اینه که مغزت داره وظیفه خودش رو انجام میده.🌱 @ravan_arama

9

3 Aug 2026, 11:41 UTC409 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

حتی وقتی خطر واقعیه، باز هم اگر بدون وقفه در معرضش بمونیم، فرسوده می‌شیم. پس هدف این نیست که وانمود کنیم اتفاقی نیفتاده. 💡هدف اینه که بین «آگاه بودن» و «غرق شدن» تفاوت قائل بشیم. @ravan_arama

👍6

3 Aug 2026, 07:18 UTC401 viewsread 9 August 2026

⚠️مغز ما برای تشخیص خطر ساخته شده. 📌اما یه فرق مهم وجود داره: دیدن خطر، با زندگی کردنِ دائمی داخل خطر یکی نیست. اگر ساعت‌ها بدون وقفه خبر بخونیم، ویدئو ببینیم یا مدام درباره اتفاقات تلخ حرف بزنیم، سیستم عصبی فرصت خاموش کردن حالت هشدار رو پیدا نمی‌کنه. نتیجه؟ بدن خسته‌تر میشه، اضطراب بیشتر میشه و تصمیم گرفتن سخت‌تر. @ravan_arama

2 Aug 2026, 09:14 UTC411 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

❔این چند روز خیلی‌ها می‌پرسن: «وقتی اوضاع واقعاً ناامنه، اصلاً میشه از روانمون مراقبت کنیم؟ یا این یعنی خودمون رو به ندیدن بزنیم؟» پاسخ کوتاه اینه: نه. 📌مراقبت از روان، انکار واقعیت نیست. قرار نیست خودمون رو قانع کنیم که «همه‌چیز خوبه». هدف فقط اینه که فشار روانی این روزها، ما رو از پا درنیاره.. @ravan_arama

👍7

1 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTC399 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

قاعده ای وجود ندارد که به درد همه بخورد، هرکس باید خودش راهی بیابد که او را نجات دهد. _تمدن و ملالت های آن. زیگموند فروید #برش_کتاب @ravan_arama

7

30 Jul 2026, 11:43 UTC445 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

6️⃣ علتی که باعث میشه مدام به پارتنرت شک کنی. شاید مشکل، چیزی نباشه که فکر می‌کنی... 📌شک، همیشه از بی‌اعتمادی نمیاد. گاهی از اضطرابی میاد که می‌خواد قبل از اینکه آسیب ببینی، ازت محافظت کنه. تا وقتی ریشه‌ی ترس درمان نشه، ذهنت همیشه یه دلیل جدید برای شک کردن پیدا می‌کنه.. @ravan_arama

7

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ravan_arama. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 961,388 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“•𝑨𝑹𝑨𝑴𝑨•” (@ravan_arama), 1,521 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ravan_arama.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.