Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

rats & rats & rats & rats & capybaras

@ratscapies

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,183subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001283197525
TypeChannel
Username@ratscapies
Descriptionadm: @utomlyaemost_admin u can always send rats to us other channels: @Chats_Cats_kocky_koty catsss @utomlyaemost picss ты крыса дааа я крыса
Created21 July 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/ratscapies

Growth

1,1836 Aug 2026, 09:51 — 1,183 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 12:00 — 1,183 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 09:516 Aug 2026, 12:00
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,182–1,184 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 12:001,183no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:511,183first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,610
Videos
282
Links
38

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

697 reactions across 20 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
36151.8%
🥰12317.6%
😍405.74%
😁355.02%
❤‍🔥243.44%
😭233.30%
😱152.15%
💘142.01%
👾121.72%
😡91.29%
👎60.861%
💔60.861%
🔥60.861%
🤬60.861%
🙈40.574%
🤔30.43%
🤩30.43%
🍓20.287%
👍20.287%
🤯20.287%
1 further kind10.143%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 697reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 January 2026 to 2 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Apr 2026, 14:52 UTC566 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

😁159🥰1😭1

27 Mar 2026, 13:09 UTC689 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @joyofexistenceVideo

Video, posted without a caption

12🥰4🙈4

9 Mar 2026, 10:03 UTC≈1,340 views49 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

29🥰12❤‍🔥6🍓2

7 Mar 2026, 16:01 UTC≈1,630 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

15❤‍🔥4😍3💘2

5 Mar 2026, 09:31 UTC≈1,220 views46 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

зато все выспались

24❤‍🔥12🥰10

27 Feb 2026, 11:27 UTC987 views33 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

ну и с пятницей тогда уж

27💔6

22 Feb 2026, 09:22 UTC≈2,560 views36 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

29🥰7

20 Feb 2026, 22:32 UTC824 views28 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @joyofexistencePhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

28

18 Feb 2026, 22:43 UTC≈1,170 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🥰173😍1

16 Feb 2026, 16:54 UTC834 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @joyofexistenceVideo

Video, posted without a caption

14👾8😁4🤔3🔥1

14 Feb 2026, 16:47 UTC950 views29 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

21🥰4😱4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ratscapies. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“rats & rats & rats & rats & capybaras” (@ratscapies), 1,183 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ratscapies.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.