Channel

𝐑𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐀𝐋 𝐄𝐃𝐆𝐄

@rationaledge

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,193subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1001598394773
Type	Channel
Username	@rationaledge
Created	24 August 2021 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded	21 August 2026
Last confirmed live	22 August 2026
Measurements held	3
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegram	t.me/rationaledge

Growth

3 measurements spanning 1 day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,193–1,194 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
22 Aug 2026, 16:04	1,193	-1
21 Aug 2026, 14:30	1,194	no change
21 Aug 2026, 14:15	1,194	first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 24 August 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

11 Mar 2026, 14:07 UTC198 viewsread 21 August 2026

Photo

https://www.tradingview.com/x/4iE8maab/ TP HIT +3% ✅ @RationalEdge

11 Mar 2026, 14:07 UTC195 viewsread 21 August 2026

Pair - NAS100 BUY STOP - 25042 SL - 400 pips TP - 1200 pips RR - 1:3 @RationalEdge

5 Mar 2026, 15:50 UTC198 viewsread 21 August 2026

Photo

https://www.tradingview.com/x/n2EoZcUQ/ TP HIT +3% ✅ @RationalEdge

5 Mar 2026, 15:50 UTC177 viewsread 21 August 2026

Pair - NAS100 BUY STOP - 25036 SL - 400 pips TP - 1200 pips RR - 1:3 @RationalEdge

5 Mar 2026, 15:50 UTC174 viewsread 21 August 2026

Photo

https://www.tradingview.com/x/n4RFakBF/ TP HIT +3% ✅ @RationalEdge

5 Mar 2026, 15:50 UTC136 viewsread 21 August 2026

Pair - XAUUSD SELL STOP - 5083.5 SL - 40 pips TP - 120 pips RR - 1:3 @RationalEdge

26 Feb 2026, 16:09 UTC138 viewsread 21 August 2026

Photo

https://www.tradingview.com/x/s8zxaz49/ TP HIT +3% ✅ @RationalEdge

26 Feb 2026, 16:09 UTC119 viewsread 21 August 2026

Pair - NAS100 SELL STOP - 25307 SL - 400 pips TP - 1200 pips RR - 1:3 @RationalEdge

26 Feb 2026, 16:09 UTC114 viewsread 21 August 2026

Photo

https://www.tradingview.com/x/YnlQkkEc/ TP HIT +3% ✅ @RationalEdge

26 Feb 2026, 16:09 UTC105 viewsread 21 August 2026

Pair - XAUUSD SELL STOP - 5157.8 SL - 40 pips TP - 120 pips RR - 1:3 @RationalEdge

24 Feb 2026, 11:30 UTC113 viewsread 21 August 2026

Photo

TP HIT 🤑🤑

24 Feb 2026, 11:30 UTC112 viewsread 21 August 2026

gold buy limit - 5176 sl - 5160 tp - 5192 @RationalEdge

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @rationaledge. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

🥇Gold Signals Academy🥇
@Gold_Signals_Academy · 2,2011 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Forex Signals Trading Crypto
@Forex_Signals_Trading_Crypto · 67,622
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐑𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐀𝐋 𝐄𝐃𝐆𝐄” (@rationaledge), 1,193 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rationaledge.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.