Channel
@ratherseefrei
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Cite this entry
20subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001244347111 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ratherseefrei |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 3 October 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ratherseefrei |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 6 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Oct 2026, 09:17 | 20 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:31 | 21 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:11 | 21 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 3 October 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 7 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 19 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
Die Zerstörung der Natur rund um den Rather See macht auch vor den umliegenden Feldern keinen Halt. Dort soll nun ein Neubaugebiet entstehen. Es gibt bereits eine Petition der Initiative BÜNDNIS FÜR DIE FELDER. Hier könnt Ihr die Petition unterzeichnen: https://buendnis-fuer-die-felder.koeln/petition/
Unsere UIG-Anfrage zu den Ereignissen rund um die Anfang März in den Rather See abgerutschte Kettenraupe war erfolgreich: https://fragdenstaat.de/a/216754
Die UIG-Anfrage an Wald und Holz NRW bezüglich der Dokumente zur Begehung am Rather See war erfolgreich.
Eine neue UIG-Anfrage ist raus: https://fragdenstaat.de/a/220074
Die Untere Umweltbehörde Köln missinterpretiert Gesetzestexte, um sich davor zu drücken, uns Dokumente auszuhändigen, die uns laut Umweltinformationsgesetz (UIG) zustehen. Müssen wir etwa wieder erst klagen? - aktuelle UIG-Anfrage - gewonnene Klage
Florian von Stein bezichtigt uns in einem Schreiben an die Bezirksvertretung Kalk, die Ratsfraktionen und die Oberbürgermeisterin der Lüge und Falschdarstellung. Dazu nehmen wir in diesem Text Stellung: https://ratherseefrei.koeln/stellungnahme/
Sind das etwa die neuen Wahlplakate von CDU und SPD?
In zwei Tagen hätte die Vogelschonzeit begonnen.
Photo, posted without a caption
Leider sind die Rodungsarbeiten für den geplanten Parkplatz der Wasserskianlage in vollem Gange
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @ratherseefrei. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“#ratherseefrei” (@ratherseefrei), 20 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ratherseefrei.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.