Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

как они растут /

@rastut

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,058subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001125051586
TypeChannel
Username@rastut
Created28 October 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/rastut

Growth

3,0563,0603,0586 August 2026 — 3,056 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,056 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,060 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,058 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,055–3,061 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 05:423,058-2
9 Aug 2026, 10:033,060+4
6 Aug 2026, 05:003,056no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:563,056first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 1 June 2019the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2019. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2019, 18:02 UTC≈16,100 viewsread 8 August 2026

#rastbook Подборка популярных книг по истории Human Genome Project https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-most-authoritative-book-about-the-Human-Genome-Project , где скачивать книги писал здесь: https://t.me/rastut/543

Signed Kolya Katuninks

19 Aug 2019, 18:02 UTC≈14,500 viewsread 8 August 2026

У меня тут Крейг Вентер красиво лёг в яблоках, в копилку действительно хорошего научпопа #rastbook История геномики, где сюжет строится вокруг противостояния международной программы Human Genome Project с частной компанией Celera. Последнюю в 1998 создали чуваки из Perkin-Elmer (сейчас Applera) специально для секвенирования генома человека, возглавил проект скандально известный Крейг Вентер. Планировалось всё сделат

Signed Kolya Katuninks

19 Aug 2019, 18:01 UTC≈9,570 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed Kolya Katuninks

21 Jun 2019, 13:24 UTC≈11,000 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

И вот ещё жутко милая картинка из введения в операторы булевой логики на NLM https://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/disted/pubmedtutorial/020_350.html

Signed Kolya Katuninks

21 Jun 2019, 13:23 UTC≈8,490 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Чем тщательней поиск, тем криповей это представление выглядит в тексте статей, как вам примерчик? (взято из Prognostic value of stromal decorin expression in patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis http://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/5757/html )

Signed Kolya Katuninks

21 Jun 2019, 13:23 UTC≈7,300 viewsread 8 August 2026

SURROGATE NOT MOTHER$ Если вы уже смотрели видосики по метаанализу, которые я кидал в #metarastut , то знаете, что систематический обзор от несистематического отличает наличие чёткого протокола, по которому можно этот обзор воспроизвести. То есть весь процесс поиска и обработки данных при должном упорстве можно повторить и посмотреть: окажутся ли результаты такими же. То есть репликация — краеугольный камень, ага.

Signed Kolya Katuninks

20 Jun 2019, 13:22 UTC≈6,000 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

На рисунке с ладошками изображены энантиомеры кетамина как свободного основания S(-) и R(+). Можно заметить несовпадение с картинкой S(+) и R(-). Дело в том что в форме гидрохлорида у энантиомеров кетамина меняется оптическая активность в противоположную сторону https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ketamine-free-base-enantiomers%27-conformations-2D-skeletal.png

Signed Kolya Katuninks

20 Jun 2019, 13:21 UTC≈5,220 viewsread 8 August 2026

Я же во всю эту историю с энантиомерами ввязался исключительно из-за кетамина. Потому что для него это актуальный момент. Кетамин используется в анестезиологии с 1966 года. Позже был получен s-кетамин, свойства которого долго изучали и насобирали много данных, что он обладает меньшим психомиметическим действием, имеет в два раза более выраженный анальгетический эффект и даёт меньшее количество побочных эффектов, таки

Signed Kolya Katuninks

20 Jun 2019, 13:21 UTC≈4,810 viewsread 8 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

Signed Kolya Katuninks

20 Jun 2019, 13:20 UTC≈4,980 viewsread 8 August 2026

ПРО ЭНАНТИОМЕРЫ Пожалуй, тема из захватывающих в фарме. Например, вещество — одно, строение молекул одинаковое, структурная формула одна и та же, но атомы в пространстве расположены по-разному. Это то, что называется стереоизомерией. Есть разные виды стереоизомеров. Когда одна молекула в пространстве представляет собой зеркальное отражение другой молекулы — они называются энантиомерами. На Ноже есть текст об этом ht

Signed Kolya Katuninks

2 Jun 2019, 12:39 UTC≈5,540 viewsread 8 August 2026

Забыл написать, что если вы знаете ещё крутые книги/видео подобного рода (с интересными штуками про открытие и разработку лекарств) расскажите мне @katuninx Или скидывайте в комменты к посту вк https://vk.com/wall-121012486_4589 Спасибо!! 🙏🏼

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @rastut. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 938,188 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“как они растут /” (@rastut), 3,058 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rastut.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.