Posted without readable text
🔥13👍5❤3custom 52381043056045102701

Channel
@raschet7
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,148subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001584236954 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @raschet7 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/raschet7 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 1,148 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 1,149 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 1,150 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:54 | 1,151 | -8 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:54 | 1,159 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 1,160 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:11 | 1,160 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 26 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (26 March 2026 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 277 |
| Reactions total | 22 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
499 reactions across 14 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 189 | 37.9% | |
| 🔥 | 172 | 34.5% | |
| 👍 | 76 | 15.2% | |
| custom 5215561710189947188 | 10 | 2.00% | |
| custom 5850370495152655676 | 10 | 2.00% | |
| 🌚 | 10 | 2.00% | |
| custom 5238104305604510270 | 9 | 1.80% | |
| custom 5416039998904345140 | 8 | 1.60% | |
| custom 5866105837985992040 | 5 | 1.00% | |
| 🤷♂ | 5 | 1.00% | |
| custom 5854850618488786240 | 3 | 0.601% | |
| custom 5273993907028368659 | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.2% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 499reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 26 March 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @raschet7. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 March 2026 to 30 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Posted without readable text
🔥13👍5❤3custom 52381043056045102701
🔦 Если вы в Ташкенте и сидите без света В ноябре я писал пост о том, как минимизировать влияние грязного воздуха на здоровье. В этот раз продолжаю рубрику «Выживание» и рассказываю о том, что позволяет мне более-менее комфортно жить третьи сутки без электричества, когда за окном +45C. 1. Роутеры подключены к Источникам Бесперебойного Питания: Wi-Fi ест мало, на 3-5 часов хватает. Ночью не нужен, а днём можно заряд…
🔥7custom 54160399989043451405custom 58503704951526556764❤2👍2🌚1
Что я понял за 2 месяца работы в новой области • Часть 2 • Особенности текущего перехода В этой части расскажу про особенности перехода а) в конкретной ситуации б) в конкретный домен. ① Я вернулся в компанию, в которой работал прежде Лет 5 назад я бы посчитал такой сценарий невозможным и даже оскорбительным для себя, ведь это своего рода "поражение". Мне искренне казалось, что возврат в компанию равносилен призна…
🔥17❤12👍4custom 52381043056045102703custom 58503704951526556763custom 58661058379859920401
Что я понял за два месяца работы в новой области • Часть 1 Смена доменов внутри одной отрасли — далеко не то же самое, что полная смена профессии (говорю это как политолог, работавший охранником на гранитном карьере и мигрировавший в IT). За почти 10 лет в IT я сменил уже четыре домена (EdTech → Home Services → FoodTech → FinTech) и каждый раз убеждаюсь, что несмотря на меньшую радикальность, подобные переходы всё …
❤26🔥17👍12
Вам интересно почитать про то, как работают Исламские финансы?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Вчера рассказывал про неформальное влияние на Managers Conf. Сегодня - делюсь книгами по теме Вчера выступал на Managers Conf с рассказом о том, как я старательно предпочитал не замечать неформальные структуры в организациях, в которых работал. В выступлении рассказал о том, как я: а) Избегал всего, что в моей голове было связано со словами "Политика" или "Таниш-Белиш"; б) Осознал, что человеческие отношения — эт…
❤22🔥13custom 52155617101899471881custom 58548506184887862401
Если вы устали от новостей в духе "AI научился делать то" и "AI научился делать сё", а также хотите вакцину от техно-оптимизма, рекомендую ролик "Жуткие тайны ИИ". Название оригинальностью не блещет, но темы затронуты интересные. Как минимум сможете углубиться в изучение конкретной темы после просмотра. Мне наиболее жутким показался фрагмент, где ChatGPT копирует голос собеседника 🚨 Приятного просмотра! https://…
❤7👍5custom 54160399989043451403custom 58503704951526556762custom 52739939070283686591
Купил Telegram Premium за полцены, потратив 2 минуты на исследование • В macOS версии Telegram Premium стоит ~ $40/год; • В iOS ~ $30/год; • В веб-версии ~ $20/год. Сеть, VPN, и прочие штуки не менял. Функционал подписки идентичен. 😏
🔥14❤6👍4
Вчера выступил на первой в жизни панельной дискуссии. В новой роли. Сразу на английском. С распечатанной бумажкой в руке. Перед согласием я честно признался себе в том, что мой английский не будет идеальным и фиг с ним. Это решение сняло половину тревоги. Другую половину сняла поддержка близких и предварительная подготовка: • Заранее набросал ключевые тезисы по теме дискуссии (развитие экосистем); • Собрал из них…
🔥32❤24👍4🌚2
Posted without readable text
Уволился из Корзинки и понабрал кредитов... А всё потому, что с апреля я работаю в роли руководителя ФинТеха в Яндекс Узбекистан. В деталях изучаю кредитные продукты, CJM крупнейших игроков, условия и ставки. В общем, график плотный, поэтому на посты времени нет. В голове скопилась куча мыслей, которые буду по полочкам разбирать в чуть более спокойное время. А пока пара анонсов: • 30.04 приму участие в панельно…
❤60🔥39🌚6custom 52381043056045102704👍3
Dropbox в вашей жизни сегодня
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @raschet7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Вам интересно почитать про то, как работают Исламские финансы?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Dropbox в вашей жизни сегодня
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 26 March 2026 to 30 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Семён расправил плечи” (@raschet7), 1,148 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/raschet7.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.