Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

раслер | f1

@ras1ler

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

886subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004312470156
TypeChannel
Username@ras1ler
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 1 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ras1ler

Growth

881886883.511 Aug 2026, 04:46 — 881 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 09:53 — 886 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 04:4611 Aug 2026, 09:53
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 880–887 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 09:53886+5
11 Aug 2026, 04:46881first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
85.9%
avg views ÷ 886 subscribers
Avg views / post
761
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held19 (1 August 202610 August 2026)
Views total14,460
Reactions total1,741
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 04:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
46s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,741 reactions across 19 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💋56632.5%
custom 531455818521695585222613.0%
custom 54471981569807757951317.52%
custom 54430740348938718371257.18%
custom 5443086206831191357985.63%
😈905.17%
custom 5281033418556081016814.65%
custom 5406888656252213235643.68%
custom 5406622587323194211603.45%
custom 5303372565664792941593.39%
custom 5416061722848961823533.04%
custom 5233637750070087360502.87%
💔402.30%
custom 5256089824753914439341.95%
custom 5346158119334484947191.09%
custom 5237815782586489087160.919%
custom 5325601830330193084150.862%
custom 525390424045102839090.517%
custom 543144588338636464550.287%

Custom emoji. 16 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,741reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 19 we hold a reading for · 37%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ras1ler. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 19:10 UTC347 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

F1 STCKS ЛУЧШИЙ СТИКЕР КАНАЛ ПО ФОРМУЛЕ 1 🏁 • Качественные стикеры • Любые стикеры по вашему запросу ВСЕ ЭТО ТОЛЬКО ТУТ - @F1STCKS @F1STCKS @F1STCKS @F1STCKS Подписывайся , пока есть возможность ❗️❗️

💋4custom 52810334185560810163custom 52336377500700873602

10 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTC434 views78 reactions3 Starsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Ч1/1| ☺️андоскары, но у них передружба вся часть в комментариях под постом жду ваши комментарии, репосты, оценки и комментарии :) #ландоскары #передружба 🥹 песня к части «секс по питерски – kloukoma»

💋42custom 523363775007008736012custom 52810334185560810169💔4custom 52560898247539144393😈2custom 54471981569807757952custom 53033725656647929411

10 Aug 2026, 17:57 UTC417 views57 reactionsread 11 August 2026

хотите еще ландоскаров на ночь??🤭

😈30custom 52336377500700873609💋8custom 52810334185560810163custom 54160617228489618232custom 53033725656647929411custom 53256018303301930841custom 54430740348938718371

10 Aug 2026, 14:15 UTC475 views139 reactions4 Starsread 11 August 2026
Photo

БОНУСНАЯ ЧАСТЬ | ☺️андоскары – соседи по общаге вся часть в комментариях под постом жду ваши комментарии, репосты, оценки и комментарии :) #ландоскары #соседи #бонус посвящена моей любимой лпшке, которая чиллит на море

💋72custom 541606172284896182330custom 528103341855608101622custom 52336377500700873605custom 53256018303301930842custom 54430740348938718372custom 54471981569807757952😈1

10 Aug 2026, 10:54 UTC513 views74 reactionsread 11 August 2026

ориентаций не существует, все любят эту аушку 🤌🏼🤌🏼

custom 530337256566479294146💋11custom 52336377500700873606custom 52810334185560810162custom 53256018303301930842custom 54430862068311913572custom 54471981569807757952😈1

10 Aug 2026, 10:52 UTC462 views72 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 544719815698077579536💔11custom 544308620683119135711custom 53033725656647929414custom 52560898247539144393custom 52336377500700873602custom 52810334185560810162💋1

10 Aug 2026, 09:43 UTC519 views68 reactionsread 11 August 2026

почему этот пост набрал реакций больше чем часть…. пипесблин

custom 544307403489387183736custom 544308620683119135716custom 541606172284896182310custom 52336377500700873605😈1

10 Aug 2026, 08:43 UTC545 views185 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026

бонус с ландосками хотите

💋110custom 544308620683119135731custom 525608982475391443921custom 52336377500700873609custom 52810334185560810163custom 54160617228489618233custom 54471981569807757953custom 54430740348938718372

9 Aug 2026, 12:37 UTC631 views94 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026
Photo

Ч3 | 🤩’obsession silencieuse вся часть в комментариях под постом жду ваши комментарии, репосты, оценки и комментарии :) #лестаппены #одержимость

custom 540688865625221323554💋14custom 544308620683119135711custom 54066225873231942113custom 54430740348938718373💔2😈2custom 53461581193344849472

7 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC744 views35 reactionsread 11 August 2026

я, кстати, создала приват, там будут всякие апдейты, мысли и прочая хуйнч: https://t.me/+VYDrVBT_nhQ3MWUy

custom 531455818521695585225💔5custom 54430740348938718375

7 Aug 2026, 14:58 UTC770 views95 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026
Photo

Ч2 | 🤩’obsession silencieuse вся часть в комментариях под постом жду ваши комментарии, репосты, оценки и комментарии :) #лестаппены #одержимость

custom 531455818521695585256custom 534615811933448494715😈10custom 54066225873231942113custom 54471981569807757953custom 53256018303301930842custom 54430740348938718372custom 54430862068311913572

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ras1ler. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,205,264 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“раслер | f1” (@ras1ler), 886 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ras1ler.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.