Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for все шизоидные личности Натана

Channel

все шизоидные личности Натана

@rarnatan

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,272subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001841639841
TypeChannel
Username@rarnatan
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/rarnatan

Growth

1,2721,2811,276.57 August 2026 — 1,278 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,279 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,279 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,280 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,281 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,277 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,278 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,276 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,273 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,272 subscribers7 August 20261 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 25 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,271–1,282 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 10:571,272-1
29 Aug 2026, 17:551,273-3
26 Aug 2026, 23:061,276-2
23 Aug 2026, 17:341,278+1
19 Aug 2026, 16:451,277-4
16 Aug 2026, 22:131,281+1
13 Aug 2026, 16:071,280+1
7 Aug 2026, 22:471,279no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:061,279+1
7 Aug 2026, 12:221,278first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 34s
Average length
47s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

914 reactions across 20 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 545629195136611811329532.3%
custom 546081858919806470416918.5%
14115.4%
❤‍🔥10010.9%
😢525.69%
👍374.05%
💔323.50%
272.95%
🫡242.63%
🌚90.985%
🎉80.875%
👏80.875%
😁40.438%
😍30.328%
🤔30.328%
🤨20.219%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 914 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
24
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 20 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
21
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rarnatan. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 February 2026 to 1 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 13:43 UTC441 views45 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Домашнее с разговорами

custom 5456291951366118113375👏3

1 Aug 2026, 13:42 UTC456 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 546081858919806470420❤‍🔥11custom 54562919513661181136

7 Jun 2026, 17:37 UTC≈2,390 views74 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Нам тут недавно писали, что хотели бы увидеть переозвучку хентая на бусти за деньги. Я подумал и решил, что это можно сделать и бесплатно, потому с Лиришей и поработали. Только вот из-за плохой связи тг съел немного качество, но думаю, ничего. Строго не судите, мы такое никогда не озвучивали раньше, но очень постарались 👍

34custom 546081858919806470424custom 545629195136611811312❤‍🔥2🌚1😁1

5 Jun 2026, 18:39 UTC≈1,150 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

А зачем мне стаканчики и палочки?

20👍42🤔2

22 May 2026, 18:18 UTC≈1,340 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Собираю коллекцию волшебниц благодаря подаркам от Лиришки. В этот раз Фрирен 🤤 Да, на фоне Рокси снимает юбку

31❤‍🔥8👏4custom 54608185891980647044

15 May 2026, 13:55 UTC≈1,350 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мать драконов очень мило определила меня и Лиришу в животные 😊

custom 5456291951366118113197😍3👍2🌚1

8 May 2026, 16:53 UTC≈1,350 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

176👍4🌚1custom 54562919513661181131

18 Apr 2026, 17:12 UTC≈1,560 views60 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Я что упоротый

custom 545629195136611811344custom 54608185891980647049🎉3😁3🤔1

12 Apr 2026, 13:43 UTC≈1,650 views40 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

А Иисус меня сильнее любит :)

258👍4custom 54562919513661181132👏1

12 Apr 2026, 13:29 UTC≈1,610 views51 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Христос Воскрес, космонавты

❤‍🔥31custom 546081858919806470410🫡8custom 54562919513661181132

1 Apr 2026, 13:44 UTC≈1,720 views42 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Poll

У всех тг работает? Продолжаем тут собираться, а не в Максиме.

  1. Нормально работает60%
  2. Плохо, но работает12%
  3. Как я тебе тут отвечу, если он не работает, гений?28%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🫡16custom 546081858919806470414custom 54562919513661181136🌚3🤨21

30 Mar 2026, 11:08 UTC≈1,640 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Если всякие нехорошие люди душат интернет, то нужно просто начать получать от этого удовольствие, ведь это аутоэротическая асфиксия

custom 545629195136611811332custom 54608185891980647045

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rarnatan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Apr 2026, 13:44 UTCAnonymous Poll388 voters

У всех тг работает? Продолжаем тут собираться, а не в Максиме.

  1. Нормально работает60%
  2. Плохо, но работает12%
  3. Как я тебе тут отвечу, если он не работает, гений?28%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2026 to 1 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 105,971 of 1,629,497 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“все шизоидные личности Натана” (@rarnatan), 1,272 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rarnatan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.