Channel
@rapupupunzel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,256subscribers
-31 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001035124694 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rapupupunzel |
| Created | 2 October 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rapupupunzel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 5,256 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 06:17 | 5,257 | -3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 5,260 | -4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:58 | 5,264 | -8 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:32 | 5,272 | -8 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:23 | 5,280 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:37 | 5,286 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:10 | 5,286 | -1 |
| 5 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 5,287 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 24 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
648 reactions across 9 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 240 | 37.0% | |
| 😭 | 131 | 20.2% | |
| 💔 | 101 | 15.6% | |
| 😁 | 101 | 15.6% | |
| 😢 | 37 | 5.71% | |
| 😱 | 10 | 1.54% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 1.23% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 0.772% | |
| 🤗 | 5 | 0.772% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 0.617% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 0.463% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 0.463% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 648reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 24 February 2026 to 7 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
А вот и мы, а вот и я! 😂 Врываюсь в ваше пространство, чтоб поведать о своем новом канале. Некогда я упоминала, что одним из моих увлечений уже много лет является пленочная фотография. В процессе разбора архивов захотелось завести под них канал здесь, так что со всеми интересующимися делюсь - https://t.me/rapupik Там будут кадры в основном из путешествий разной степени давности. Снимаю как на 35мм, так и на 120мм, …
❤44🥰8🔥5👍4❤🔥2
Сейчас будет важное, но грустное сообщение. Этот канал должен был отпраздновать свой 10-летний юбилей в этом году, но я приняла решение больше его не вести. Причин накопилось много, расписывать все не вижу смысла. Хочу сказать огромное СПАСИБО всем вам за поддержку, комментарии, вопросы и реакции на мои посты. Именно благодаря вам мы здесь так долго держались на плаву ❤️ СПАСИБО всем читателям, брендам и их представ…
😭131💔101😢37❤31🤯3🤗2❤🔥1😁1
Теперь главное не повестись на вторую мою шальную мысль и не бахнуть родной цвет волос. А то я даже не знаю, что сложнее - отрастить челку или тонироваться в русый поверх блонда и потом снова осветляться 🗿
❤28
Fabao при!!!
😁19
Надо было купить накладку с вб и угомониться 😂
❤41😁21🤗3
А также вчера была совершена роковая ошибка…
😁57😱10
Вы же знаете, как сильно я люблю растения. Вчера была на FloraFest в Севкабеле и с трудом ушла оттуда всего лишь с небольшим пакетиком, а хотелось забрать решительно все! Потом я вспомнила, сколько мне еще предстоит пересаживать по весне, и желание набивать сумки подугасло 😅 И где же, кроме как у блогеров, вы узнаете, что наконец наступила весна?? Кроме шуток, мне очень нравится, что каждый год ей все так рады, будт…
❤36😁3
Промежуточный вестник использования Fabao 101B. Пользуюсь тоником с декабря, о фантастических результатах пока не идет и речи. Свежих торчунов в массовом количестве пока нет, но для них и рановато. Невероятной скорости роста пока тоже не наблюдаю. Стабильно пахну хмели-сунели каждый вечер, на этом всё!
❤34
Как-то так вышло, что праздничные выходные обошлись у меня без праздников. Впрочем, смотря что ими считать. В Петербурге на небе было обнаружено яркое космическое круглое тело. Возможно, блин. Долго игнорировала концерты во дворцах, хотя, казалось бы, ведь лучше места и не придумать, но барокко в Эрмитаже нельзя было упустить. В Большом Итальянском просвете вообще регулярно устраивают концерты, акустика там замечат…
❤26
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @rapupupunzel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,598,121 of 1,605,487entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Рапупупунцель” (@rapupupunzel), 5,256 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rapupupunzel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.