RAMON SAFETY pinned «Ticket service is open. If anyone has received an inspection, feel free to send it over @ramon_usa✅ @ramon_usa✅»

Channel
RAMON SAFETY
@ramon_safety
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,821subscribers
+1,719 since we began measuring on 24 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004396504102 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ramon_safety |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 23 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 24 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ramon_safety |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 14:18 | 2,821 | +20 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 17:56 | 2,801 | +33 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 09:19 | 2,768 | +49 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 08:43 | 2,719 | +1,412 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:23 | 1,307 | +60 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 1,247 | +129 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:54 | 1,118 | +16 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 1,102 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 23 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 23.1%
- avg views ÷ 2,821 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 651
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.345%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 5
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (23 August 2026 – 24 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,605 |
| Reactions total | 9 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 56s
- Average length
- 9s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
61 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 20 | 32.8% | |
| 💯 | 14 | 23.0% | |
| 👏 | 10 | 16.4% | |
| 🤣 | 8 | 13.1% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 4.92% | |
| 🏆 | 3 | 4.92% | |
| 😐 | 2 | 3.28% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 1.64% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 61 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 August 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Ticket service is open. If anyone has received an inspection, feel free to send it over @ramon_usa✅ @ramon_usa✅
🏆1👏1💯1🔥1
#hotnews Police conduct an inspection at a truck stop. Lugoff, South Carolina
🔥2
#hotnews Hamilton Township, N'yu-Jersi ICE checking each trucks @ramon_safety
💯1🔥1
#hotnews Texas US 287 rest area da inspection @ramon_safety
🔥1
ahahah good info from lawyer 🚛 TRUCKING SAFETY TIP A traffic ticket does not always have to end up on a driver’s record. ⚖️ If the case goes to trial and the officer does not appear, the ticket may be dismissed. However, this is not guaranteed and depends on the case and the court’s rules. ✅ If the officer does appear, an attorney may still be able to negotiate the violation down to a 0-point, non-moving violation…
💯2
This is my real case‼️ 🚛 WHY DO TICKET CASES SOMETIMES TAKE LONGER? Many drivers expect a quick result after giving a ticket to an attorney. However, some traffic and commercial ticket cases can take time before a final result is reached. ⚖️ Common reasons include: • Negotiations with the prosecutor • Working to reduce or dismiss the violation • Additional court hearings being required • The attorney needing more ti…
⚡1❤1👏1🔥1
🚛 TICKET DOESN’T ALWAYS MEAN “JUST PAY IT” I had a case exactly like this. In situations like this, a driver can simply pay the listed amount and close the case. But if the violation is reported on the driver’s record, it can remain on the MVR and potentially create problems when applying for future jobs. In many cases, it can work against the driver. Many drivers may not fully understand the process because of langu…
🏆1💯1🔥1
🚨 OKLAHOMA TRAFFIC TICKET 📅 Date: June 28, 2026 📍 Location: I-40 WB, Mile Marker 328, Oklahoma 🚛 Company:***** 👤 Driver:******* ⚠️ Violation: Unsafe Lane Change 📜 Statute: 47 O.S. § 11-309.2 💰 Minimum Fine & Costs: $249 📌 Note: The citation is marked Property Damage-Only.
🔥1
Video, posted without a caption
🔥1
Wear your glasses when driving or you can try and pass the eye test without them. Then your restriction can be removed📄
💯2🔥2
🛑 BRAKE SAFETY WEEK | AUGUST 23–29, 2026 CVSA’s Brake Safety Week is taking place August 23–29. During this week, commercial vehicles may receive increased roadside inspections focused on brake systems. 🔍 Main focus: • Brake drums & rotors • Brake pads/linings • Air lines & brake chambers • Slack adjusters & brake adjustment • Cracks, damage, or missing components ⚠️ Brake-related OOS violations can place the truck …
💯2👏1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ramon_safety. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RAMON SAFETY” (@ramon_safety), 2,821 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ramon_safety.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.