Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 40 days, net -42. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,131–4,185 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 05:58
4,137
-7
11 Sept 2026, 20:59
4,144
-6
7 Sept 2026, 10:56
4,150
-4
2 Sept 2026, 13:18
4,154
-5
30 Aug 2026, 15:44
4,159
-9
27 Aug 2026, 20:55
4,168
+3
24 Aug 2026, 18:16
4,165
+3
21 Aug 2026, 12:38
4,162
+1
18 Aug 2026, 21:45
4,161
-5
16 Aug 2026, 01:45
4,166
-3
12 Aug 2026, 10:33
4,169
-3
9 Aug 2026, 09:53
4,172
-3
6 Aug 2026, 17:12
4,175
-4
6 Aug 2026, 04:16
4,179
no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:25
4,179
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 4 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
384 reactions across 12 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
211
54.9%
🙏
115
29.9%
🔥
27
7.03%
👏
10
2.60%
🕊
7
1.82%
👍
6
1.56%
❤🔥
2
0.521%
💯
2
0.521%
🤯
2
0.521%
😁
1
0.26%
🥰
1
0.26%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 384 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 4 January 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 12 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ramanamaharishi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 January 2026 to 29 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
☀️🌿SHUBH GURU-PURNIMA🌿☀️
✨Guru and Grace✨
🪔As Explained by Sri Ramana🪔
I have not said that the Guru is not necessary. But a Guru need not always be in human form. First a person thinks that he is inferior and that there is a superior, all-knowing, all powerful God who controls his own and the world’s destiny and worships him or does bhakti (devotion).When he reaches a certain stage and becomes fit for enlightenmen…
☀️PRACTICE OF SELF-ENQUIRY☀️
🌿If one attends to the centre of oneself with a keen mind to know “Who am I?”, the identification ‘I am the body’ will die and the Reality will shine forth as ‘I-I’. Then all the illusory differences, which are like the blueness seen in the sky, will disappear.
🌿Restraining the mind from going outside [through the senses], and fixing it always in its Source, Self, which is known as the …
🍂The Master is within. But as long as you think you are separate or that you are the body, so long is the Master from 'without' necessary. When the wrong identification of oneself with the body ceases, the Master will be found as none other than the Self.
Does the Guru hold you by the hand and whisper in [your] ear? Because you think you are a body, you think he also has a body, to do something tangible with you. Bu…
🍂By coming near to the Sadhguru and by depending completely upon His Grace, with great Guru-bhakti, one will have no misery in this world and will live like Indra [the king of Deities, having all the heavenly enjoyments at his feet].
~Sri Ramana Maharshi
•Guru Vachaka Kovai, Verse 324
🎞@HinduismAsItIs🎞
🎞@AwakeninWithRamanaMaharshi🎞
✈@ramanamaharishi || @ramana_maharishi✈️
🍂SAMADHI IS DEEP SLEEP DURING THE WAKING STATE🍂
Question: What is deep sleep?
Maharshi: Just as on a dark, cloudy night, no individual identification is possible, and there is only darkness, even though the seer has his eyes wide open, similarly, in deep slumber, the seer is only aware of simple nescience.
Question: Why can't we stay in deep sleep forever or enter it at will?
Maharshi: Deep sleep also exists in t…
🍂 The thought of God is Divine Favour! He is by nature, Grace [prasad or arul]. It is by God’s Grace that you think of God.
~Sri Ramana Maharshi
•Excerpt From: Talk 29
🎞@HinduismAsItIs🎞
🎞@AwakeninWithRamanaMaharshi🎞
✈@ramanamaharishi || @ramana_maharishi✈️
K.M. Jivrajan: Has one necessarily to pass through the stage of seeing occult visions before attaining Self-realization?
Bhagavan: Why do you bother about visions and whether they come or not?
K.M. Jivrajani: I don’t. I only want to know so that I shan’t be disappointed if I don’t have them.
Bhagavan: Visions are not a necessary stage. To some they come and to others they don’t, but whether they come or not, "you"…
While I was engaged in this search, I heard about the extraordinary greatness of Bhagavan Sri Ramana through a holy person whom I happened to meet at Sri Perumbuthur. On 2nd May 1918, I saw Sri Ramana for the first time at Skandashram on Arunachala.
I beseeched him fervently in the following words: 'It is my great desire that I should actually experience your gracious wisdom. Kindly fulfill my desire.'
In those day…
Disciple.: I am a sinner. I do not perform religious sacrifices (homas), etc. Shall I have painful rebirths for that reason? Pray save me!
Maharshi.: Why do you say that you are a sinner? Your trust in God is sufficient to save you from rebirths. Cast all burden on Him.
~Sri Ramana Maharshi
•Excerpt From: Talk 30
🎞@HinduismAsItIs🎞
🎞@AwakeninWithRamanaMaharshi🎞
✈@ramanamaharishi || @ramana_maharishi✈️
☀️THE EXISTENCE OF THE HIGHER POWER MUST BE ADMITTED AND RECOGNIZED☀️
We think that the world can be conquered by our efforts. When frustrated externally and driven internally, we feel, “Oh! oh! There is a power higher than man.” The existence of the higher power must be admitted and recognised. The ego is a very powerful elephant and cannot be brought under control by anyone less than a lion, who is no other than t…
🍂 'Who am I?' is not a mantra. It means that you must find out where in you arises the 'I-thought', which is the source of all other thoughts. But if you find this vichara marga too hard for you, you can go on repeating "I, I" and that will lead you to the same goal. There is no harm in using 'I' as a mantra. It is the first name of God.
~Sri Ramana Maharshi
•From: Day By Day, 8-5-46
🎞@HinduismAsItIs🎞
🎞@AwakeninWit…
🍂SHUBH ARUDRA DARSHANAM AND 146TH RAMANA JAYANTI🍂
On this sacred day, where the Margazhi Arudra star aligns with the radiance of the Full Moon, the ceremonial Abishekam and Aradhana for Lord Nataraja, enshrined with Sri Sivakama Sundari at Sri Ramanasramam, were performed with great spiritual fervor.
It is a profound divine blessing that the auspicious Punarvasu star—following this very Arudra—marks the advent of B…
🙏16❤14🕊2🥰1
Signed ᦔιꪜιꪀє ꪑyʂтιᥴ
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @ramanamaharishi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@ramanamaharishi named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@awakeninwithramanamaharshi named in 20 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Brahmakumaris BK Shivani @brahmakumaris_bkshivani · 27,033 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 September 2026
Sadhguru @Sadhguru · 22,918 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ramana Maharshi | रमण महर्षि | ரமண மகரிஷி” (@ramanamaharishi), 4,137 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ramanamaharishi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.