RAKETA — проверенный сервис выгодной экспресс-доставки из Китая для байеров и личных заказов 🇨🇳
🚀Доставка от 8 дней | в 2–3 раза дешевле магазинов
Сайт: https://raketacn.ru/
Чат: @raketacn_officialchat
Отзывы: @raketaReviews
Created
Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
55 measurements spanning 89 days, net -672. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,340–25,231 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 55
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Nov 2026, 06:17
24,456
-2
3 Nov 2026, 02:56
24,458
+9
2 Nov 2026, 05:39
24,449
+1
1 Nov 2026, 08:19
24,448
+5
31 Oct 2026, 08:20
24,443
-44
30 Oct 2026, 08:18
24,487
+8
29 Oct 2026, 06:29
24,479
+1
28 Oct 2026, 05:21
24,478
+7
27 Oct 2026, 02:09
24,471
-46
26 Oct 2026, 00:50
24,517
-22
25 Oct 2026, 02:28
24,539
+3
24 Oct 2026, 04:47
24,536
+9
23 Oct 2026, 04:41
24,527
+6
20 Oct 2026, 18:31
24,521
-29
19 Oct 2026, 15:56
24,550
+14
18 Oct 2026, 13:41
24,536
-9
17 Oct 2026, 15:31
24,545
-7
16 Oct 2026, 16:00
24,552
-17
15 Oct 2026, 18:46
24,569
-226
14 Oct 2026, 16:28
24,795
first reading
Engagement
106 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 123 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.53%
avg views ÷ 24,456 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,090
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 106 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 26 of 27 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
106 (30 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
56,332
Reactions total
633
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 16:02 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,750
Videos
≈587
Links
≈1,360
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
5m 22s
Average length
32s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,497 reactions across 104 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
921
36.9%
custom 5449429091843327635
349
14.0%
🤣
247
9.89%
😍
245
9.81%
👍
197
7.89%
custom 5289880153537667137
160
6.41%
🥰
63
2.52%
👏
40
1.60%
🤔
40
1.60%
💔
38
1.52%
💘
37
1.48%
💯
34
1.36%
🙏
34
1.36%
🤩
33
1.32%
😎
27
1.08%
😢
14
0.561%
🤯
8
0.32%
🐳
6
0.24%
🎉
4
0.16%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 104 of the 106 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,497 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 106 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
145
across the posts below
Posts paid on
51
of 106 we hold a reading for · 48%
Most on one post
33
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @raketacn_official. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 106 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 27 posts held from the last 30 days (25.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Мы ждём именно ТВОЁ ВИДЕО!
…Чтобы подарить тебе 11 111₽ на шопинг🔥😍
➡️Конкурс RAKETA в самом разгаре⬅️
Хотели напомнить: чтобы выиграть, не обязательно быть блогером, делать невероятный монтаж или иметь тысячи подписчиков…
— Не знаешь, с чего начать? Подкинули идеи-примеры для видео (они не участвуют в конкурсе) Выбирай свой формат, снимай и залетай в конкурс!🚀💙
Пс…шансы выиграть очень высоки!🤫
#конкурс_RAKETA
🎬 Сними видео — получи бонус от RAKETA!
В честь распродажи 11.11 мы запускаем конкурс для наших клиентов!
▶️Расскажи о своём опыте заказов из Китая и доставку через сервис RAKETA, опубликуй видео и получи награду. А самое приятное: бонус получит КАЖДЫЙ участник, чье видео наберет больше 2000 просмотров!
🎁 Какие призы?
🏆 1-3 место — денежный приз по 11 111₽ каждому!
Победителями станут три участника, чьи ролики на…
📦 Вы уже обновили адрес склада RAKETA?
Мы уже принимаем и отправляем посылки с нового склада КАЖДЫЙ ДЕНЬ (в 3 раза быстрее, чем раньше)🔥
И мы к вам с важным напоминанием:
➡️Проверьте адрес на всех маркетплейсах — отправлять посылки нужно на НОВЫЙ АДРЕС!
Новый адрес можно скопировать в личном кабинете RAKETA
🔻Как поменять адрес?
🤫А хотите подглядеть за нашим новым складом? Собираем 50 🔥 (огней) под этим постом — …
Какую косметику выгодно покупать на Poizon 1️⃣1️⃣🔤1️⃣1️⃣?
Провели расследование: 🔍
Dior — скидки на палетку!
YSL — скидки на наборы!
Chloe — скидки на парфюм!
CT — скидки на карандаши!
NARS — скидки на ВСЁ!
Бегите закупаться: добавляйте в корзину и оформляйте заказ 🛍
🔗РАССЧИТАТЬ ДОСТАВКУ
*стоимость доставки на косметику всегда приятная за счет небольшого веса и маленьких габаритов!*
#подборки_RAKETA
🔥 Горячая находка: ботинки Timberland за 635¥
Та самая классика, которая не выходит из моды! А сейчас на Poizon — скидка 60%
Было: 1 599¥ (~21 580₽)
Стало: 635¥ (~8 570₽)
Отличный повод присмотреться к паре на осень и зиму!
🔗ССЫЛКА НА БОТИНКИ
#горячие_находки_RAKETA
💡У нас тут появилась одна идея…
Мы знаем, что многие из вас заказывают классные вещи из Китая или ещё не заказывали, но уже собрали себе классную подборку товаров!
💬Вопрос: вы бы смогли снять Reels в своём Instagram* с распаковкой из Китая или о заказе через RAKETA?
— А мы бы, конечно, не оставили это без внимания!🤫
Есть среди вас те, кто на всё отвечает «Газ!»?
🔥— да, смог(ла) бы
🤔— надо подумать!
*принадлежит…
Подборка вещей из Китая, которые раньше боялись заказывать…📦
Красивые бокалы, вазы, зеркала как из Pinterest… Всё это хочется добавить в корзину, но есть одно «но»: а вдруг разобьётся в пути? 🥲
💬У RAKETA для вас есть кое-что — дополнительная защита хрупких отправлений с помощью 3 услуг!
— Фотоотчет
— Дополнительная упаковка
— «Защита от рисков»
А если эти услуги были подключены, но ваш товар повредился при достав…
📦Как правильно указать новый адрес склада RAKETA?
Чтобы вам было проще обновить адрес на китайских маркетплейсах, мы подготовили наглядные примеры того, как должен выглядеть новый адрес на разных площадках🔼
Ориентируйтесь на изображения при заполнении данных, но важный момент:
⚠️ID пользователя (он указан красным на скриншотах) обязательно замените на свой — его можно найти в личном кабинете RAKETA
Проверьте адре…
🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾
⚡️RAKETA переезжает! Сохраните новый адрес склада в Китае
Мы переезжаем из города Цзиси в Дунин — и вам нужно обновить адрес склада RAKETA на китайских маркетплейсах!
Taobao, Poizon, 1688, JD, Tmall, Weidian, 95fen, Pinduoduo, Goofish, Suning и другие, где у вас сохранён старый адрес, — проверьте все
❓Почему важно сделать это сейчас?
— Чтобы не забыть при оформлении следующего заказа и не отправить тов…
✈️Экспресс-доставка стала дешевле для ряда регионов России!
Мы изменили схему доставки: теперь посылка летит из Уссурийска в Москву, а оттуда отправляется в ваш город через СДЭК
❔Что это даёт? Экспресс-тариф стал заметно дешевле!
📦Сколько ждать?
Доставка со склада в Китае до некоторых регионов ~10-12 дней
📍Для каких регионов действует новая схема? — Написали в комментариях!
В СДЭК городом отправления может отобр…
🔥10😍3custom 54494290918433276353
Showing the 12 most recent of 106 posts we hold for @raketacn_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@raketacn_official edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
28 September 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @raketacn_official as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
13 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
26 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
25 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RAKETA • Официальная доставка из Китая🚀” (@raketacn_official), 24,456 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/raketacn_official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.